Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinChief
Oh dear. You don;t even know what we are arguing do you? We are not arguing wether he was RIGHT, we are arguing wether he knew what the word means and used it correctly to convey how he felt. He did.
Read his post about workers in the restaurant industry... it is CLEAR he knows the word and used it to convey the meaning he wanted. You can argue til your blue in the face that he is wrong... but you will continue to play the fool if you argue that he used the wrong word.
If I say the sky is black and it is daytime and it is blue... I may be wrong but I didn't misuse the word black.. I didn't pick the wrong word I was just wrong.
You claimed he misused (or didn't understand) the word... that clearly isn't the case. You SHOULD have argued that American workers are not (falsely) entitled vis a vis "Mexican" workers. Instead you attacked his word choice... and in a "real" debate you'd get your ass handed to you for doing so.
|
I'm not reading the entirety of your post, because you made a fatal error from the beginning.
We are not, actually, debating whether or not he knew the meaning of the word.
We are debating its usage as applied to the argument at hand, nothing more.
His usage of entitled, when discussing mexicans being cheaper beacuse they don't carry insurance or offer warranties, has nothing to do with entitlement, and everything to do with liability and responsibility.
If you believe the argument between you and I is about anything different, then you misunderstood or misinterpreted my contention that he misused the word, and would would do you well to go re-read the entirety of this thread, of which you did not participate in.
Quote:
Originally Posted by J Diddy
End of God damned debate, brought to you by a silky smooth liberal mother****er.
|
