Would you consider the offseason FA period a success for the Chiefs?

[Mr_Tomahawk]

With the additions of Routt, Hillis, Boss, and now Winston; do you consider this a successful offseason thus far?


If no...who else would we need to sign (realistically) in order for you to consider it a success?

[gold_and_red]

Originally Posted by wazu

It makes me angry.

it makes me angrier that he is inexplicably interested in Dungver.

[chiefzilla1501]

Originally Posted by milkman

We saved 4 mil a year.

That's not chump change.

And the miniscule chance that Ortan could lead this team to a playoff win isn't worth the crying that you're doing.

Add in head coach and offensive coordinator.

So we've decided that we can win in spite of our head coach, offensive coordinator, quarterback, nose tackle. But we sure are good at geting premiere support players. Again yes we got great values and upgraded key positions. Buy this front office has yet to demonstrate that they have any ****ing clue how to get premiere players at core positions.

What we've seen this offseason is the same old shtick. Lets hire coaches based on the tree, lets build players who will make our qbbetter, lets build around support players while doing nothing to build the core. These players are good but we upgrades only in positions we could have easily upgraded in the second or third round of the draft.

[TheGuardian]

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

Add in head coach and offensive coordinator.

So we've decided that we can win in spite of our head coach, offensive coordinator, quarterback, nose tackle. But we sure are good at geting premiere support players. Again yes we got great values and upgraded key positions. Buy this front office has yet to demonstrate that they have any ****ing clue how to get premiere players at core positions.

What we've seen this offseason is the same old shtick. Lets hire coaches based on the tree, lets build players who will make our qbbetter, lets low

JFC

How many drives were totally ****ed last year from Richardson?

If signing "premiere" free agents were the key to winning then the Redskins would have won multiple super bowls by now.

Please remove your head from your ass.

[milkman]

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

Add in head coach and offensive coordinator.

So we've decided that we can win in spite of our head coach, offensive coordinator, quarterback, nose tackle. But we sure are good at geting premiere support players. Again yes we got great values and upgraded key positions. Buy this front office has yet to demonstrate that they have any ****ing clue how to get premiere players at core positions.

What we've seen this offseason is the same old shtick. Lets hire coaches based on the tree, lets build players who will make our qbbetter, lets low

Bottom line in your thought process.

Let's replace shit with shit.

How is that a winning formula?

[L.A. Chieffan]

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

Add in head coach and offensive coordinator.

So we've decided that we can win in spite of our head coach, offensive coordinator, quarterback, nose tackle. But we sure are good at geting premiere support players. Again yes we got great values and upgraded key positions. Buy this front office has yet to demonstrate that they have any ****ing clue how to get premiere players at core positions.

What we've seen this offseason is the same old shtick. Lets hire coaches based on the tree, lets build players who will make our qbbetter, lets build around support players while doing nothing to build the core. These players are good but we upgrades only in positions we could have easily upgraded in the second or third round of the draft.

i see youre avoiding my question about carr vs routt

[Chiefnj2]

I liked the hiring of Romeo. The players played hard for him and it was evident after the Green Bay win that they were happy for HIM to get the win.

I really dislike the hiring of Daboll. He hasn't done anything to earn another OC gig.

[milkman]

Bottom line here.

The Chiefs with Matt Cassel, and without Jamaal Charles, have avreraged 13 points a game.

The Chiefs with Kyle Ortan averaged 13 points a game.

[007]

Originally Posted by chief103182

I'm holding out hope that Crennel truly does not like Cassel, and will hold that bias through training camp when he's up against his "competition."

don't get me wrong. I plan to wait and see what happens in the draft and training camp before final judgement. But if we see no real competition at the QB position then this offseason is a fail in my book.

Unfortunately, I don't see Quinn as anything more than Cassel 2.0 and we still know nothing about Stanzi other than we want to see what he can do. At this point, I really hope we do draft Tennehill even though I don't like him either. In this situation it will at least show they know Cassel is no longer worth a shit.

[L.A. Chieffan]

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2

I liked the hiring of Romeo. The players played hard for him and it was evident after the Green Bay win that they were happy for HIM to get the win.

I really dislike the hiring of Daboll. He hasn't done anything to earn another OC gig.

he got us hillis. which in turn got us winston. we's gonna be runnin ovah fools!

[chiefzilla1501]

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan

i see youre avoiding my question about carr vs routt

Carr is younger and better than routt. You are naive if you think otherwise.

[L.A. Chieffan]

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

Carr is younger and better than fourth. You are naive if you think otherwise.

i said other than age. thanks for proving me right.

[gold_and_red]

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk

With the additions of Routt, Hillis, Boss, and now Winston; do you consider this a successful offseason thus far?


If no...who else would we need to sign (realistically) in order for you to consider it a success?

Pioli's moves are to provide as much ammunition as possible for shithead Cassell to succeed. It is worrisome because a QB is supposed to carry the offense and make clutch plays when needed, but here Pioli is protecting Cassell already.

I personally think this is a do or die year for MC. The caveat is that we might win this worthless division and get bounced out in the first round. But Pioli will give MC another year because he showed"progress".

[whoman69]

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan

They WERE interested and Manning told them to **** OFF. You, he told YOU to **** off. How does that make you feel man? To know that Manning thinks you suck.

He thinks the Chiefs suck, more specifically, their front office. Should be a wake up call. Four years of Cassel is a fail. Saying you will bring in competition for Cassel and then saying Brady Quinn is that competition is an outright lie.

[chiefzilla1501]

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan

i said other than age. thanks for proving me right.

Carr is better. Don't be a Homer.

[L.A. Chieffan]

Originally Posted by whoman69

He thinks the Chiefs suck, more specifically, their front office. Should be a wake up call. Four years of Cassel is a fail. Saying you will bring in competition for Cassel and then saying Brady Quinn is that competition is an outright lie.

No, you had it correct right there. Hes a dumbass. Obviously winning one more SB before he rides off into the sunset just isnt that important to him