Chiefs If not #1, where? - Page 11

OrtonsPiercedTaint · 01-16-2013, 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup

Just curious. Is there a reputable draftnik that is considering any of the QB's worth the #1 overall pick?

Ones not employed by ESPN or NFLNetwork. Whos purpose is to get repeat business/viewers by constantly changing up thier boards

**ptlyon** · 01-16-2013, 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrtonsPiercedTaint

Ones not employed by ESPN or NFLNetwork. Whos purpose is to get repeat business/viewers by constantly changing up thier boards

Wow - now thats a moniker!

Chief Roundup · 01-16-2013, 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ptlyon

Wow - now thats a moniker!

Yeah another mult probably.

Chief Roundup · 01-16-2013, 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrtonsPiercedTaint

Ones not employed by ESPN or NFLNetwork. Whos purpose is to get repeat business/viewers by constantly changing up thier boards

Got any real names? Other than showing that you don't like what they have to say because you want to disagree doesn't qualify.
So far I have heard 1.

Rambozo · 01-16-2013, 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChefBoyRDEE
Andy is a master of trading down and accumulating picks

Andy is a known for trading up and getting the guy he wants. He did it several drafts in a row. I think you have it backwards.

Pasta Little Brioni · 01-16-2013, 12:52 PM

Number 1

NightHawk · 01-16-2013, 01:12 PM

If they keep Palmer, then I don't see them drafting a quarterback all in this draft and instead will go with him that year. However, if they decided to cut Palmer, then I can see them drafting a quarterback sometime in the draft. It just may not be in the first round, in which I fear they well.

Chiefs Pantalones · 01-16-2013, 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones

The draftniks keep saying that Geno Smith isn't worth the #1 pick.
None of them say he isn't the top QB in the class though.
If we don't take him at #1 how far is he realistically going to fall?

I see no scenario where he falls out of the Top 10.

So if he's the top QB in a weak class...
QB is our biggest need...
And he's gonna go Top 10 anyway...

Why not at #1?

Am I wrong to say he won't fall out of the Top 10?

Discuss...

We don't have a choice but to take a QB #1 overall. They'll all be gone by the next time we pick.

Chris Meck · 01-16-2013, 01:29 PM

There's no way he'd make it past the Bills.

RunKC · 01-16-2013, 01:38 PM

Everyone on this board wants to draft a QB 1st overall just because we haven't done it in forever.
Geno is a huge risk and isn't a sure thing and so is anyone in everyone in this mediocre QB class. Are all QB's a risk? Yes. But when when several NFL scouts question this entire class and say that they feel they aren't very good prospects, you don't draft for NEED and take one 1st overall because you NEED it. I'll take the scouts opinion over anyone on this board. The desperate mindset is amazing on here yikes.

Maybe that's why they want to trade down. Because they know they can get more picks and get a good QB prospect they like in the 6-10 range.

O.city · 01-16-2013, 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC

Everyone on this board wants to draft a QB 1st overall just because we haven't done it in forever.
Geno is a huge risk and isn't a sure thing and so is anyone in everyone in this mediocre QB class. Are all QB's a risk? Yes. But when when several NFL scouts question this entire class and say that they feel they aren't very good prospects, you don't draft for NEED and take one 1st overall because you NEED it.

I'll take the scouts opinion over anyone on this board. Maybe that's why they want to trade down. Because they know they can get more picks and get a good QB prospect they like in the 6-10 range.

Well, if that works out, fine.

But then you run the risk of not getting the guy you like.

**DaneMcCloud** · 01-16-2013, 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city

Well, if that works out, fine.

But then you run the risk of not getting the guy you like.

What if you don't like any of them?

See, that's the REASON for the The Combines: It puts every single player invited on an EQUAL PLAYING FIELD.

From medical to psyche to physical to intelligence to personality to ability, these guys are administered the same exact tests for their respective positions so that they can be scrutinized evenly.

O.city · 01-16-2013, 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

What if you don't like any of them?

See, that's the REASON for the The Combines: It puts every single player invited on an EQUAL PLAYING FIELD.

From medical to psyche to physical to intelligence to personality to ability, these guys are administered the same exact tests for their respective positions so that they can be scrutinized evenly.

True.

Although I'm not sure the top QB's will throw at the combine.

RunKC · 01-16-2013, 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city

Well, if that works out, fine.

But then you run the risk of not getting the guy you like.

I would not be surprised if we traded for a QB and drafted one, or even two in different rounds of the draft.

People keep thinking that Geno is KC's pick because he's the top pick. I think it's more of "well no other positions make sense for the Chiefs so QB is the only one to project".

NFL scouts don't view Geno as a top 10 pick. I've heard that twice already on NFL Network and ESPN. That's why I'm so confused as to why this guy isn't going to the Senior Bowl? I think he's more scared of his stock dropping than rising.

There probably will be 2, possibly 3 QB's taken in the first 10 picks of the draft.
According to scouts, it's a NEED pick and we already established we are not doing that NEED bullshit anymore.

O.city · 01-16-2013, 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC

I would not be surprised if we traded for a QB and drafted one, or even two in different rounds of the draft.

People keep thinking that Geno is at KC because he's the top pick. I think it's more of "well no other positions make sense for the Chiefs so QB is the only one to project".

NFL scouts don't view Geno as a top 10 pick. I've heard that twice already on NFL Network and ESPN. That's why I'm so confused as to why this guy isn't going to the Senior Bowl? I think he's more scared of his stock dropping than rising.

There probably will be 2, possibly 3 QB's taken in the first 10 picks of the draft.
According to scouts, it's a NEED pick and we already established we are doing that NEED bullshit anymore.

You need to figure out that need is incorporated into BPA. Position of the player as well.

And people seem to be projecting him there because, yes he is a QB which the Chiefs need, QB's tend to get overdrafted, and he fits Reids offensive philosophy pretty well.

01-16-2013, 12:52 PM	#6
Pasta Little Brioni Consuming CP souls Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: U.S.A. Casino cash: $3708880	Number 1 __________________ **Official TFWdemB Trivia Commisioner**
Posts: 68,857

01-16-2013, 01:12 PM	#7
NightHawk Starter Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Independence, MO Casino cash: $10004925	If they keep Palmer, then I don't see them drafting a quarterback all in this draft and instead will go with him that year. However, if they decided to cut Palmer, then I can see them drafting a quarterback sometime in the draft. It just may not be in the first round, in which I fear they well.
Posts: 69

01-16-2013, 01:29 PM	#9
Chris Meck MVP Join Date: May 2001 Location: midtown KC Casino cash: $1704910	There's no way he'd make it past the Bills.
Posts: 17,569

01-16-2013, 01:38 PM	#10
RunKC Andy Reid Supporter Join Date: Apr 2012 Casino cash: $1979611	Everyone on this board wants to draft a QB 1st overall just because we haven't done it in forever. Geno is a huge risk and isn't a sure thing and so is anyone in everyone in this mediocre QB class. Are all QB's a risk? Yes. But when when several NFL scouts question this entire class and say that they feel they aren't very good prospects, you don't draft for NEED and take one 1st overall because you NEED it. I'll take the scouts opinion over anyone on this board. The desperate mindset is amazing on here yikes. Maybe that's why they want to trade down. Because they know they can get more picks and get a good QB prospect they like in the 6-10 range.
Posts: 46,299