Chiefs What's the least you'd settle for in order to trade down? - Page 2

Direckshun · 03-19-2013, 11:10 AM

I don't think the #1 pick can be traded. A lot of you disagree with me.

Let's test out what you'd even be willing to accept.

Poll forthcoming.

**Easy 6** · 03-19-2013, 11:25 AM

A second this year and a first next year... we're talking about a left tackle who only gave up one sack in 2012 iirc, if someone wants him they better pony up.

KC_Lee · 03-19-2013, 11:25 AM

Voted 2nd this year, and their 1st next year.

Toss in a 5th or 6th this year too just for kicks and giggles.

**The Franchise** · 03-19-2013, 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott free

A second this year and a first next year... we're talking about a left tackle who only gave up one sack in 2012 iirc, if someone wants him they better pony up.

You didn't read the thread....did you?

**Bowser** · 03-19-2013, 11:28 AM

I went the first two choices. You simply cannot throw away the first overall pick because the talking head on TV say there isn't any quality at the top of the draft this year. If someone wants the top spot, you make them pay for it, period.

And I also went with the D's whore mom and baseball bats option. Eight Major League quality Louisville Sluggers are nothing to sneeze at, even if the whore mom may be.

B14ckmon · 03-19-2013, 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott free

A second this year and a first next year... we're talking about a left tackle who only gave up one sack in 2012 iirc, if someone wants him they better pony up.

...This thread isn't about Albert.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser

I went the first two choices. You simply cannot throw away the first overall pick because the talking head on TV say there isn't any quality at the top of the draft this year. If someone wants the top spot, you make them pay for it, period.

And I also went with the D's whore mom and baseball bats option. Eight Major League quality Louisville Sluggers are nothing to sneeze at, even if the whore mom may be.

That's stupid. What if they have a guy they WANT but don't think will drop to 8-15? That would mean they could trade down one or two spots and still get their guy. That is the reason why the cost to trade up depends on your position. Expecting the Jaguars to pony up that much is stupid.

OrtonsPiercedTaint · 03-19-2013, 11:32 AM

A top 3 QBotF this or next year(might have to trade back up).

**Easy 6** · 03-19-2013, 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence

You didn't read the thread....did you?

Errr, maybe not

philfree · 03-19-2013, 11:34 AM

If we're trading down one spot with Jax I'd swap our #1, #63, #99 for their #2, #33 and #64. We don't gain a pick we just greatly improve our position. They don't lose a pick they get Geno and then give up position. We'd have a pick in every round again except the 4th but we have that comp 3rd to make up for that.

CHENZ A! · 03-19-2013, 11:36 AM

I would settle for Geno Smith, and a 2013 2nd round pick.

Reerun_KC · 03-19-2013, 11:36 AM

wouldn't trade a ****ing thing...

You get a QB and stop beating off to the dreams of 9-7...

Pasta Little Brioni · 03-19-2013, 11:36 AM

A 2nd and a bag of chicken chips and a bag of ja lap a noes

Deberg_1990 · 03-19-2013, 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Except it's bogus.

There's a big difference between a team that's wanting to jump from the 20's to the #1 spot and a team in the Top Five that wants to jump to the #1 spot.

in 95 , the Niners gave up a 1st, 3rd and 4th in 95 and a 1st in 96 to move up 20 spots (30th to 10th) to draft JJ Stokes.

Yes, the price is high if you want to jump from a low to a high spot.

Fritz88 · 03-19-2013, 11:38 AM

So far, Dorsey has been getting raped in FA. Yes, he did make some nice moves, but..

He could have probably used Glenn Dorsey in the Alex trade.

He could have used Cassel earlier in a trade instead of holding on to him for so long.

I wouldn't be surprised to see him get blown in a trade down, if it happens..

**The Franchise** · 03-19-2013, 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fritz88

So far, Dorsey has been getting raped in FA. Yes, he did make some nice moves, but..

He could have probably used Glenn Dorsey in the Alex trade.

He could have used Cassel earlier in a trade instead of holding on to him for so long.

I wouldn't be surprised to see him get blown in a trade down, if it happens..

Glenn Dorsey was not under contract. Therefore....we couldn't trade him.

saphojunkie · 03-19-2013, 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fritz88

So far, Dorsey has been getting raped in FA. Yes, he did make some nice moves, but..

He could have probably used Glenn Dorsey in the Alex trade.

He could have used Cassel earlier in a trade instead of holding on to him for so long.

I wouldn't be surprised to see him get blown in a trade down, if it happens..

A) No, he hasn't.
B) No, he couldn't have. Dorsey was a free agent and they would have had to re-sign him in order to trade him, and then San Francisco would have just offered Dorsey more money. This is reeruned.
3) WTF are you even talking about now.
4) ANYTHING WE GET FOR TRADING DOWN IS GOOD. THE ONLY UNACCEPTABLE EVENT IS STAYING AT 1.1 AND TAKING A NON-QB.

View Poll Results: Chiefs give up #1 pick. In addition to the other team's 1st, the Chiefs get:
a 2nd this year, and their 1st and 2nd next year, plus extra picks.	9	10.98%
a 2nd this year, and their 1st and 2nd next year.	17	20.73%
a 2nd this year, and their 1st next year.	30	36.59%
a 2nd this year, and their 2nd next year.	10	12.20%
a 2nd and a third this year.	4	4.88%
a 2nd this year, and their 3rd next year.	4	4.88%
a 2nd and a midrounder this year.	1	1.22%
a 2nd this year, and a midrounder next year.	2	2.44%
a 2nd this year.	6	7.32%
a 1st next year.	5	6.10%
a 3rd this year, and a 1st next year.	3	3.66%
a 3rd this year, and a 2nd next year.	1	1.22%
a 3rd this year, and a 2nd next year.	0	0%
a 3rd this year, and a 3rd next year.	0	0%
a 3rd and a midrounder this year.	0	0%
a 3rd this year.	0	0%
even less than a 3rd this year.	0	0%
Other (please explain).	4	4.88%
Direckshun's whore of a mother and eight baseball bats.	11	13.41%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 82. You may not vote on this poll

03-19-2013, 11:10 AM
Direckshun __ Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Springpatch Casino cash: $4183447	What's the least you'd settle for in order to trade down? I don't think the #1 pick can be traded. A lot of you disagree with me. Let's test out what you'd even be willing to accept. Poll forthcoming.
Posts: 59,314

03-19-2013, 11:25 AM	#16
Easy 6 pie is never free Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: the drivers seat Casino cash: $3467775	A second this year and a first next year... we're talking about a left tackle who only gave up one sack in 2012 iirc, if someone wants him they better pony up.
Posts: 91,950

03-19-2013, 11:25 AM	#17
KC_Lee You're CARICATURES, ALL of you Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Kansas City, MO Casino cash: $1710960	Voted 2nd this year, and their 1st next year. Toss in a 5th or 6th this year too just for kicks and giggles. __________________ “There is no absolute knowledge. And those who claim it, whether they are scientists or dogmatists, open the door to tragedy.” - Jacob Bronowski, The Ascent of Man
Posts: 9,445

03-19-2013, 11:28 AM	#19
Bowser sorta mod-ish Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: KC North Casino cash: $3211616	I went the first two choices. You simply cannot throw away the first overall pick because the talking head on TV say there isn't any quality at the top of the draft this year. If someone wants the top spot, you make them pay for it, period. And I also went with the D's whore mom and baseball bats option. Eight Major League quality Louisville Sluggers are nothing to sneeze at, even if the whore mom may be.
Posts: 101,031

03-19-2013, 11:32 AM	#21
OrtonsPiercedTaint MVP Join Date: Dec 2012 Casino cash: $10004980	A top 3 QBotF this or next year(might have to trade back up).
Posts: 5,994

03-19-2013, 11:34 AM	#23
philfree Indian Twitter Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Free Agency Casino cash: $1386198	If we're trading down one spot with Jax I'd swap our #1, #63, #99 for their #2, #33 and #64. We don't gain a pick we just greatly improve our position. They don't lose a pick they get Geno and then give up position. We'd have a pick in every round again except the 4th but we have that comp 3rd to make up for that. __________________ [/SIGPIC]
Posts: 15,021

03-19-2013, 11:36 AM	#24
CHENZ A! pimping hoes + clocking a grip Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: KCMO Casino cash: $9977569	I would settle for Geno Smith, and a 2013 2nd round pick.
Posts: 6,302

03-19-2013, 11:36 AM	#25
Reerun_KC Rock Chalk Jayhawks! KU!!! Join Date: Aug 2005 Casino cash: $8301160	wouldn't trade a ****ing thing... You get a QB and stop beating off to the dreams of 9-7...
Posts: 934

03-19-2013, 11:36 AM	#26
Pasta Little Brioni Consuming CP souls Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: U.S.A. Casino cash: $3728880	A 2nd and a bag of chicken chips and a bag of ja lap a noes __________________ **Official TFWdemB Trivia Commisioner**
Posts: 68,848

03-19-2013, 11:38 AM	#28
Fritz88 Custom User Title Join Date: Nov 2008 Casino cash: $8835943	So far, Dorsey has been getting raped in FA. Yes, he did make some nice moves, but.. He could have probably used Glenn Dorsey in the Alex trade. He could have used Cassel earlier in a trade instead of holding on to him for so long. I wouldn't be surprised to see him get blown in a trade down, if it happens..
Posts: 12,706