Someone help!

[Iowanian]

It depends on the job.

High End Female Prostitutes probably make ALOT more than the He-hookers.

[marsaray]

Originally Posted by Iowanian

It depends on the job.

High End Female Prostitutes probably make ALOT more than the He-hookers.

And crack whores lose all their money. But the point is Im doing this for school and im sure my teacher wouldnt appreciate that response.

[Iowanian]

Originally Posted by marsaray

And crack whores lose all their money. But the point is Im doing this for school and im sure my teacher wouldnt appreciate that response.

You obviously know how to use the Internet Mr Potter..........Conjure up a google search spell.

[marsaray]

Originally Posted by Iowanian

You obviously know how to use the Internet Mr Potter..........Conjure up a google search spell.

Or I could make a statistics potion. I need hard poll stuff so this shall work.

[Iowanian]

Originally Posted by marsaray

I need hard poll .

Russ.................I think its time to talk to the son about watching less BRAVO TV.

[Rain Man]

http://www.census.gov/apsd/cqc/cqc20.pdf


Here you go. It's missing the latest data from the 2000 Census, but it'll give you a good answer to the workforce participation question.

Men are more likely to hold jobs, but primarily because there are still a lot of older women who were career homemakers. The workforce participation rates for younger men and women is probably very close, but men will still be more likely to hold jobs.

On the pay issue, you'll see a lot of statistics that show that men make more money than women. That's kind of true and kind of false. A typical man makes more than a typical woman, but there are two things that really skew that: remember those older women who aren't in the workforce? A lot of them have husbands with 30 or 35 years of experience and they're high-paid senior managers now, and there are fewer women with that experience and that seniority. That tends to push up men's average salaries and push down women's average salaries.

The second reason, which is diminishing over time but still strong, is that women are much more likely to work in sectors that pay lower wages, like retail stores and service jobs. While they're working there for $8.00 an hour, the men are working more in construction and information technology for $15.00 an hour.

If you look at a man and woman who are the same age and work in the same field, you'll tend to see very similar salary levels (though men are still a slight bit higher, to be honest). The difference is real, but it's nowhere near this 30 or 40 percent figure that women's lobbies like to trumpet.

[PastorMikH]

Originally Posted by Rain Man

http://www.census.gov/apsd/cqc/cqc20.pdf


Here you go. It's missing the latest data from the 2000 Census, but it'll give you a good answer to the workforce participation question.

Men are more likely to hold jobs, but primarily because there are still a lot of older women who were career homemakers. The workforce participation rates for younger men and women is probably very close, but men will still be more likely to hold jobs.

On the pay issue, you'll see a lot of statistics that show that men make more money than women. That's kind of true and kind of false. A typical man makes more than a typical woman, but there are two things that really skew that: remember those older women who aren't in the workforce? A lot of them have husbands with 30 or 35 years of experience and they're high-paid senior managers now, and there are fewer women with that experience and that seniority. That tends to push up men's average salaries and push down women's average salaries.

The second reason, which is diminishing over time but still strong, is that women are much more likely to work in sectors that pay lower wages, like retail stores and service jobs. While they're working there for $8.00 an hour, the men are working more in construction and information technology for $15.00 an hour.

If you look at a man and woman who are the same age and work in the same field, you'll tend to see very similar salary levels (though men are still a slight bit higher, to be honest). The difference is real, but it's nowhere near this 30 or 40 percent figure that women's lobbies like to trumpet.

He should rep you daily for a week for an answer like this.

[PastorMikH]

I can't even believe this punk kid neg repped me!


Positive Rep to all that Neg rep him!

[marsaray]

Originally Posted by PastorMikH

I can't even believe this punk kid neg repped me!


Positive Rep to all that Neg rep him!

I could have Darth Russ "Neg Rep" you and we all know what his rep abilitys are.

[Skip Towne]

Originally Posted by PastorMikH

I can't even believe this punk kid neg repped me!


Positive Rep to all that Neg rep him!

Done. I can cost him around 300 points.

[Rain Man]

Originally Posted by PastorMikH

I can't even believe this punk kid neg repped me!


Positive Rep to all that Neg rep him!

I feel responsible for this, and I'm going to carry that with me for the rest of my life.

[redbrian]

Originally Posted by Rain Man

http://www.census.gov/apsd/cqc/cqc20.pdf


Here you go. It's missing the latest data from the 2000 Census, but it'll give you a good answer to the workforce participation question.

Men are more likely to hold jobs, but primarily because there are still a lot of older women who were career homemakers. The workforce participation rates for younger men and women is probably very close, but men will still be more likely to hold jobs.

On the pay issue, you'll see a lot of statistics that show that men make more money than women. That's kind of true and kind of false. A typical man makes more than a typical woman, but there are two things that really skew that: remember those older women who aren't in the workforce? A lot of them have husbands with 30 or 35 years of experience and they're high-paid senior managers now, and there are fewer women with that experience and that seniority. That tends to push up men's average salaries and push down women's average salaries.

The second reason, which is diminishing over time but still strong, is that women are much more likely to work in sectors that pay lower wages, like retail stores and service jobs. While they're working there for $8.00 an hour, the men are working more in construction and information technology for $15.00 an hour.

If you look at a man and woman who are the same age and work in the same field, you'll tend to see very similar salary levels (though men are still a slight bit higher, to be honest). The difference is real, but it's nowhere near this 30 or 40 percent figure that women's lobbies like to trumpet.

Another factor that you need to look at is that women tend to be lousy negotiators when it comes to salary (I’m talking mid to upper management level here), this was reported in a recent research project (sorry I have no links, heard it discussed on NPR the other day).

Add in the fact that men also tend to have higher levels of education and professional training.

All of which contributes to higher wages for the male.

However when you truly look at a level playing field

Equal Job
Equal Education
Equal Experience
Equal Time in the work force
Equal negotiating skills

Men and women compare equally in the pay and benefit sector.

[Iowanian]

Oh no.....No he didn't.

[marsaray]

Originally Posted by Iowanian

Oh no.....No he didn't.

He'll friggen use his force choke on you.

[Iowanian]

Your daddy wouldn't want to draw the Wrath of Darth Iowanian.

The only choking of which you know is your chicken, yoda.