Ty Law - Page 2

Wallcrawler · 09-12-2005, 04:06 PM

Well, whats the general opinion of Ty Law now that we have seen him in action?

I wasnt really impressed, he did have the one pick in the endzone, but overall Law had very little impact on the game.

I dont know if it was Law not being 100% yet, or Trent Green's evisceration of David Barrett all day long that just didnt give Law too many chances at making any plays. Either way, I didnt see too many instances where #24 was in on a play.

In the Quarter that I saw of Surtain, and of Law, who played the whole game...

Surtain > Law

Carl dropped the big money on the right guy.

carlos3652 · 09-12-2005, 04:55 PM

Surtain in 1 1/2 quarters gave me more excitement than Mcleon + Bartee gave me in 16 games last year.

But Surtain 5 min motionless on the field also had me worried more than Mcleon + Bartee had me worried in 2004...

Im glad he is ok... I cant wait until he gives us a full 4 qtrs...

Sure-Oz · 09-12-2005, 05:38 PM

did derrick blaylock ever get in

**ShortRoundChief** · 09-12-2005, 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz

did derrick blaylock ever get in

At the end when the game was over.

jspchief · 09-12-2005, 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 4th and Long

Local sports talk radio said when they asked Green about that play he said he was baited into throwing that pass by Law. Said Law played off the receiver and Green thought he was open. As soon as the ball left his hand Law was all over the receiver.

Law didn't have to "bait" Green. By sticking to his assignment, he was in position to intercept that pass already.

It was a horrible play design for that spot on the field. We ran two WRs to the same sideline, one at the front of the endzone and the other at the back. Since we were already on the 5, it made it so the DBs only had 15 yards worth of field to cover. By Law sticking with his man on the shorter pattern, he was automatically in position to pick off Green's throw. A lob would have given the deep DB a chance to pick it. I just don't see how that pattern could possibly be effective. Any pro CB on the short route would have had a decent shot at that pass. Dumb.

We should have been running the damn ball anyway.

Eleazar · 09-12-2005, 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990

You guys are crazy if you think Ty Law would not be a HUGE asset to have on this team come January when we might have to face Brady/Manning/Roethlisberger

Roethlisberger kind of took care of himself in the playoffs, as far as his opponents were concerned.

Herzig · 09-12-2005, 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990

You guys are crazy if you think Ty Law would not be a HUGE asset to have on this team come January when we might have to face Brady/Manning/Roethlisberger

I'm ready to see Surtain and Warfield + our new defense play together. I think Law and Surtain would have been better, but those two plus Knight should bring a pretty stout, aggressive, defense.

Deberg_1990 · 09-12-2005, 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Herzig

I'm ready to see Surtain and Warfield + our new defense play together. I think Law and Surtain would have been better, but those two plus Knight should bring a pretty stout, agressive, defense.

Agreed....i cant wait to see them all at 100%. I wish we had Law, but at this point, its the best we got and that aint bad at all.

CoMoChief · 09-12-2005, 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia

That pick in the endzone is on Green's shoulders. Bartee would have intercepted that one, too.

I don't know how much we really challenged Law. I saw him fall down on one out route. That is all I can remember off the top of my head.

Woah.......Woah........Woah............Woah............Woah............Woah.................Woah.... ........Bartee?!?!? Are you serious? Bartee has yet to recieve his first REAL INT. That's saying alot man.

I dont really know what Trent Green was thinkin on that throw though so I kinda get what you mean, but saying that BARTEE would INT the ball is a bit over the top IMO.

Gaz · 09-13-2005, 06:04 AM

The INT belongs equally to Saunders & Green.

Stupid, stupid play call. Reminiscent of the Seattle game. Run the f-bombing ball, Al.

Stupid, stupid throw. Green should know better. That corner was way too crowded and the ball should have gone into the seats.

Credit Law for catching the ball. Coles was not able to do the same.

xoxo~
Gaz
Hoped that Al learned his lesson in Seattle.

cadmonkey · 09-13-2005, 06:27 AM

Me and Amnorix were telling you all this all offseason.

Gaz · 09-13-2005, 06:29 AM

Move along, folks.

Nothing to see here.

xoxo~
Gaz
Waving the baton in an authoritative manner.

Brock · 09-13-2005, 06:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990

You guys are crazy if you think Ty Law would not be a HUGE asset to have on this team come January when we might have to face Brady/Manning/Roethlisberger

Then I'm crazy. I'd rather have Surtain.

Gaz · 09-13-2005, 06:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock

Then I'm crazy. I'd rather have Surtain.

Ditto.

xoxo~
Gaz
Certifiable.

Chiefnj · 09-13-2005, 06:44 AM

With Law on the field the Chiefs picked on Barrett. Law didn't give up any passing TD's and got an INT in the endzone.

Seems like a good day for a corner who has been injured for the last year and has only been able to run since August.

Gaz · 09-13-2005, 06:51 AM

Law got an INT handed to him [full credit for catching the ball, though] and the Chiefs picked on a rookie [which is the generally-accepted tactic in football].

xoxo~
Gaz
Would not call that a particularly good day.

09-12-2005, 04:06 PM
Wallcrawler How tall is this thing? Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Ground 0 for enema of US. Casino cash: $2092912	Ty Law Well, whats the general opinion of Ty Law now that we have seen him in action? I wasnt really impressed, he did have the one pick in the endzone, but overall Law had very little impact on the game. I dont know if it was Law not being 100% yet, or Trent Green's evisceration of David Barrett all day long that just didnt give Law too many chances at making any plays. Either way, I didnt see too many instances where #24 was in on a play. In the Quarter that I saw of Surtain, and of Law, who played the whole game... Surtain > Law Carl dropped the big money on the right guy.
Posts: 7,909

09-12-2005, 04:55 PM	#16
carlos3652 El Diablo Join Date: Dec 2004 Casino cash: $1686679	Surtain in 1 1/2 quarters gave me more excitement than Mcleon + Bartee gave me in 16 games last year. But Surtain 5 min motionless on the field also had me worried more than Mcleon + Bartee had me worried in 2004... Im glad he is ok... I cant wait until he gives us a full 4 qtrs... __________________
Posts: 6,108

09-13-2005, 06:04 AM	#24
Gaz Defense Homer Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Rancho Gaz Casino cash: $10010793	A couple of boneheads... The INT belongs equally to Saunders & Green. Stupid, stupid play call. Reminiscent of the Seattle game. Run the f-bombing ball, Al. Stupid, stupid throw. Green should know better. That corner was way too crowded and the ball should have gone into the seats. Credit Law for catching the ball. Coles was not able to do the same. xoxo~ Gaz Hoped that Al learned his lesson in Seattle.
Posts: 5,911

09-13-2005, 06:27 AM	#25
cadmonkey Please no Vick!!!!!! Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Boston, Ma Casino cash: $10004900	Me and Amnorix were telling you all this all offseason. __________________
Posts: 13,115

09-13-2005, 06:29 AM	#26
Gaz Defense Homer Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Rancho Gaz Casino cash: $10010793	Sure, fix your post and make me look silly... Move along, folks. Nothing to see here. xoxo~ Gaz Waving the baton in an authoritative manner.
Posts: 5,911

09-13-2005, 06:44 AM	#29
Chiefnj MVP Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Willis, Harris and Davis. Casino cash: $10004900	With Law on the field the Chiefs picked on Barrett. Law didn't give up any passing TD's and got an INT in the endzone. Seems like a good day for a corner who has been injured for the last year and has only been able to run since August. __________________ "I always tell (the assistant coaches), 'Make it simple, 'cause I'm stupid,'" Edwards said. "This ain't computer football." Herm Edwards, 3-20-07 Q: Herm, back on December 25th you were asked if Trent Green was your starter going into next season and you said, ‘yeah, why wouldn’t he be?’ Have you changed your mind on that? EDWARDS: No, I have not.” (1-11-07)
Posts: 6,811

09-13-2005, 06:51 AM	#30
Gaz Defense Homer Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Rancho Gaz Casino cash: $10010793	Enh... Law got an INT handed to him [full credit for catching the ball, though] and the Chiefs picked on a rookie [which is the generally-accepted tactic in football]. xoxo~ Gaz Would not call that a particularly good day.
Posts: 5,911