Which Loss Would You Like Another Shot At? - Page 2

Direckshun · 11-06-2006, 07:10 PM

Let's face it, folks. We were true to Herm's word.

We were certainly better on Week 4 than we were on Week 1. And we were certainly better on Week 8 than we were on Week 4.

Knowing that we are the team that we are now, and the Bengals, Bronks, and Steelers are the teams they are now... which one do you want a second shot at?

We're 5-3 -- but if you could play over one of those losses, which would you choose?

Would you go back to Cincy and make the Chiefs perfect at home?

Would you want to go right into the heart of Denver and retake the rare chance of beating an elite team on their home field?

Would you want to officially erase that Pittsburg game from your mind, and waste Worthlessberger, exposing that game for the fluke it surely was?

Frazod · 11-06-2006, 09:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater

Pittsburgh. That was a complete embarrassment, plus they're by far the worst team we've lost too.

Obviously I voted Denver, but I'd just like to voice my complete and utter contempt for those goatfucking douchebag $tealer$. Like gaffling our playoff spot last year wasn't bad enough, now they have to beat us and then LOSE TO EVERY OTHER TEAM IN OUR DIVISION, including the friggin Raiders.

It's like they're on a personal mission to screw us. Bastards. I hope they next time they fly somewhere their fucking plane crashes into the side of mountain.

Direckshun · 11-06-2006, 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by siberian khatru

I think the only poll that would be more lopsided would be:

Who would you rather have sex with?

A) Catherine Zeta-Jones
B) Nancy Kulp

I do have a knack for creating incredibly lopsided polls that completely surprise me for their lack of competitiveness.

This is something I'll have to work on.

*goes back to lab*

boogblaster · 11-06-2006, 09:34 PM

As bad as the Donk loss was, the shit-kickin at Steelers, we should have been ready for the bungholes..plus that cheap-shot on Green...........

PastorMikH · 11-06-2006, 10:34 PM

Without a doubt Cinncy. A chance to repeat that game with a different outcome - a W AND Trent surviving without getting hammered would be my first choice.

KCGridironBeast · 11-06-2006, 10:57 PM

I think if we played Cincy right now, we would not have much of a problem beating them. Unfortunately, Huard was probably unprepared and the team didn't quite have the flow that it has right now. If we went back into Denver, I don't know if we would have as good of a chance at getting the victory as we would if we played Cincy again.

GoodDaySir! · 11-06-2006, 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod

I hope they next time they fly somewhere their fucking plane crashes into the side of mountain.

Frazod · 11-06-2006, 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoodDaySir!

FWIW, I hope you're on the flight too, queerbait.

**007** · 11-06-2006, 11:08 PM

Easy. DENVER!

View Poll Results: With these four teams as they are now, which game would you like another shot at?
Week 1: Cincy 24, Chiefs 10	8	15.69%
Week 2: Denver 9, Chiefs 6	39	76.47%
Week 5: Pittsburg 45, Chiefs 7	4	7.84%
Gaz's paranoia is a self-fulfilling prophecy.	0	0%
Voters: 51. You may not vote on this poll

11-06-2006, 07:10 PM
Direckshun __ Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Springpatch Casino cash: $4133447	Which Loss Would You Like Another Shot At? Let's face it, folks. We were true to Herm's word. We were certainly better on Week 4 than we were on Week 1. And we were certainly better on Week 8 than we were on Week 4. Knowing that we are the team that we are now, and the Bengals, Bronks, and Steelers are the teams they are now... which one do you want a second shot at? We're 5-3 -- but if you could play over one of those losses, which would you choose? Would you go back to Cincy and make the Chiefs perfect at home? Would you want to go right into the heart of Denver and retake the rare chance of beating an elite team on their home field? Would you want to officially erase that Pittsburg game from your mind, and waste Worthlessberger, exposing that game for the fluke it surely was?
Posts: 59,321

11-06-2006, 09:34 PM	#18
boogblaster MVP Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Verdigris Valley Campsite Casino cash: $10004900	As bad as the Donk loss was, the shit-kickin at Steelers, we should have been ready for the bungholes..plus that cheap-shot on Green...........
Posts: 10,305

11-06-2006, 10:34 PM	#19
PastorMikH Will KC ever be better? Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Land of Red Dirt & Necks Casino cash: $9925087	Without a doubt Cinncy. A chance to repeat that game with a different outcome - a W AND Trent surviving without getting hammered would be my first choice. __________________
Posts: 20,454

11-06-2006, 10:57 PM	#20
KCGridironBeast Stick a fork in 'em... Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: In the black Casino cash: $10004900	I think if we played Cincy right now, we would not have much of a problem beating them. Unfortunately, Huard was probably unprepared and the team didn't quite have the flow that it has right now. If we went back into Denver, I don't know if we would have as good of a chance at getting the victory as we would if we played Cincy again.
Posts: 201

11-06-2006, 11:08 PM	#23
007 Shaken. Not stirred. Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: London Casino cash: $13850126 VARSITY	Easy. DENVER! __________________ My dear girl, there are some things that just aren’t done. Such as, drinking Dom Perignon ’53 above the temperature of 38 degrees Fahrenheit. That’s just as bad as listening to the Beatles without earmuffs.
Posts: 65,559