Movies and TV Terminator Salvation teaser - Page 2

Deberg_1990 · 07-16-2008, 02:45 PM

http://movies.yahoo.com/premieres/88...tandardformat/

I wonder how the TV series will fit in with this??

**Tribal Warfare** · 07-16-2008, 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stryker

That is so they can come out with the UNRATED versions on DVD - Hell look at Die Hard 4!

Which sucked not as much as "Die Harder", but had a very stale storyline with the PG-13 rating.

CoMoChief · 07-16-2008, 06:52 PM

This doesn't look good at all

But at least it's better than the 3rd one, my god.

irishjayhawk · 07-26-2008, 09:15 PM

From ComicCon, apparently the footage they showed there was incredibile. And I'm beginning to jump on the bandwagon after learning a couple things:

First, he isn't under any pressure to deliver a PG-13 movie. So, let's hope it's R.
Second, he's taking visual cues from Children of Men! Hell yeah!
Third, everyone on the production seems to think McG isn't using the same formula that has made his past movies mediocre. Instead, he's taking it to a new level.

Sounds awesome and expect a trailer on Quantum of Solace.

Deberg_1990 · 07-26-2008, 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by irishjayhawk

From ComicCon, apparently the footage they showed there was incredibile. And I'm beginning to jump on the bandwagon after learning a couple things:

First, he isn't under any pressure to deliver a PG-13 movie. So, let's hope it's R.
Second, he's taking visual cues from Children of Men! Hell yeah!
Third, everyone on the production seems to think McG isn't using the same formula that has made his past movies mediocre. Instead, he's taking it to a new level.

Sounds awesome and expect a trailer on Quantum of Solace.

At least McG dumped the visual tricks for his last movie " We are Marshall" But the results were still mediocre.

I have zero faith this guy can deliver a quality product.

irishjayhawk · 07-26-2008, 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990

At least McG dumped the visual tricks for his last movie " We are Marshall" But the results were still mediocre.

I have zero faith this guy can deliver a quality product.

I do too. But I'm hoping that the current buzz is correct: he's going about this one differently.

I'd much rather have a director who makes a good movie after making crap than one who is a top tier director who makes a pile of crap. At least then if the movie is crap, you can go, well he still makes the same quality films.

cardken · 07-27-2008, 06:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Valiant

That shit pisses me off.. PG-13 is better now then what it used to be.. But the violence is still cut back a lot as with the blood..

Make more movies R rated..

Understand the goal of studios. They are'nt interested in making good adult themed films, only interested in getting you in the theatres with your kids and sell them Happy Meals and Action figures. Sad but true folks. The new RoboCop will guarenteed be PG 13. Too much youth marketability.Sad because the first 2 in the franchise were balls out violent, not by todays standards, but alot of buzz about it back in the day. Also a watered down franchise (RoboCop), by the third one could'nt tell in was of the same theme.

irishjayhawk · 07-27-2008, 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cardken

Understand the goal of studios. They are'nt interested in making good adult themed films, only interested in getting you in the theatres with your kids and sell them Happy Meals and Action figures. Sad but true folks. The new RoboCop will guarenteed be PG 13. Too much youth marketability.Sad because the first 2 in the franchise were balls out violent, not by todays standards, but alot of buzz about it back in the day. Also a watered down franchise (RoboCop), by the third one could'nt tell in was of the same theme.

Actually, that's not quite true. They have pretty much stated that Robocop will retain its aura. And I really don't think Arronofsky can make a PG-13 movie.

Deberg_1990 · 07-27-2008, 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by irishjayhawk

Actually, that's not quite true. They have pretty much stated that Robocop will retain its aura. And I really don't think Arronofsky can make a PG-13 movie.

Its still pretty much a 'Paycheck" job for Aronofsky. But we have seen where indie directors can elevate and transcend the genre. Heck, the original Robocop flick itself was a fine example of that. Its still a great flick.

irishjayhawk · 07-27-2008, 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990

Its still pretty much a 'Paycheck" job for Aronofsky. But we have seen where indie directors can elevate and transcend the genre. Heck, the original Robocop flick itself was a fine example of that. Its still a great flick.

Well, Aronofsky was the first person Warners approached about Batman. His take was too dark for them.

Think about that. Too Dark. Then think Dark Knight.

shammus · 07-27-2008, 11:26 AM

If my understanding of the chronology is correct, the new Terminator Salvation movie(s) won't really have too much to do with the TV show. The TV series is based on events that occur between t2 and t3. Salvation is going to be kicking off a new trilogy that occurs after t3 in the timeline and deals with John Connor leading the humans against the machines post-judgement day.

I've read on a couple websites that Arnold might be involved with the film but in a small, cameo-esque role. Anyone else have any other information on his level of involvement with the film?

R&GHomer · 07-27-2008, 01:46 PM

I'll go see it. Christian Bale as John Conner is actually a pretty good casting. Who knows? I really didn't like the last one all that much. "shrug" I'm thinking this is a wait to DVD movie for me. Hell, I haven't even seen Batman yet and I really want to see that one IMAX.

Red Dawg · 07-27-2008, 02:19 PM

are fugging crazy. That movie will kick ass! What Terminator movie sucked? It's a cool story line with good special effects. No way this movie sucks.

**Tribal Warfare** · 07-27-2008, 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tuckdaddy

are fugging crazy. That movie will kick ass! What Terminator movie sucked? It's a cool story line with good special effects. No way this movie sucks.

No Arnold or James Cameron, I'll reiterate I'm skeptical if this will be a good movie

Deberg_1990 · 07-27-2008, 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R&GHomer

I'll go see it. Christian Bale as John Conner is actually a pretty good casting.

What is he now, the 4th or 5th guy who has played Conner?

Huffman83 · 07-27-2008, 04:20 PM

To me it looks like it will be a Road Warrior type movie w/ terminators.

Could be worse....I don't know how...but yeah!

07-16-2008, 02:45 PM
Deberg_1990 In Search of a Life Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: San Antonio Tx. Casino cash: $3444454	Terminator Salvation teaser http://movies.yahoo.com/premieres/88...tandardformat/ I wonder how the TV series will fit in with this??
Posts: 66,914

07-16-2008, 06:52 PM	#17
CoMoChief Mahomes Dynasty Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Parts Unknown Casino cash: $7972254	This doesn't look good at all But at least it's better than the 3rd one, my god. __________________
Posts: 39,174

07-26-2008, 09:15 PM	#18
irishjayhawk Feelin' Alright Join Date: Aug 2004 Casino cash: $10004900	From ComicCon, apparently the footage they showed there was incredibile. And I'm beginning to jump on the bandwagon after learning a couple things: First, he isn't under any pressure to deliver a PG-13 movie. So, let's hope it's R. Second, he's taking visual cues from Children of Men! Hell yeah! Third, everyone on the production seems to think McG isn't using the same formula that has made his past movies mediocre. Instead, he's taking it to a new level. Sounds awesome and expect a trailer on Quantum of Solace.
Posts: 16,887

07-27-2008, 11:26 AM	#25
shammus Starter Join Date: Sep 2006 Casino cash: $8224957	Movies and TV Terminator Salvation teaser If my understanding of the chronology is correct, the new Terminator Salvation movie(s) won't really have too much to do with the TV show. The TV series is based on events that occur between t2 and t3. Salvation is going to be kicking off a new trilogy that occurs after t3 in the timeline and deals with John Connor leading the humans against the machines post-judgement day. I've read on a couple websites that Arnold might be involved with the film but in a small, cameo-esque role. Anyone else have any other information on his level of involvement with the film?
Posts: 171

07-27-2008, 01:46 PM	#26
R&GHomer Veteran Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Olathe Casino cash: $10004900	I'll go see it. Christian Bale as John Conner is actually a pretty good casting. Who knows? I really didn't like the last one all that much. "shrug" I'm thinking this is a wait to DVD movie for me. Hell, I haven't even seen Batman yet and I really want to see that one IMAX. __________________ Tod Haley: "I just want to coach well, have our team play well and make this city proud of us again."
Posts: 3,900

07-27-2008, 02:19 PM	#27
Red Dawg Going home eventually Join Date: Dec 2002 Casino cash: $4432858	All of you are fugging crazy. That movie will kick ass! What Terminator movie sucked? It's a cool story line with good special effects. No way this movie sucks. __________________ If you're not first you're last!
Posts: 30,489

07-27-2008, 04:20 PM	#30
Huffman83 Veteran Join Date: Mar 2007 Casino cash: $10008077	To me it looks like it will be a Road Warrior type movie w/ terminators. Could be worse....I don't know how...but yeah!
Posts: 2,240