Chiefs So We're Picking Somewhere Between 2 and 4 Correct? - Page 2

RINGLEADER · 12-21-2008, 04:14 PM

It's between us, the Rams, and Seahawks, correct?

If we lose next week and:

Rams win we pick 2
Rams lose we pick 3

If we win next week and:

Seahawks lose we pick 4

Is that correct?

King_Chief_Fan · 12-21-2008, 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox

I just checked and it is mathematically impossible for us to have a weaker SOS than Seattle. If we are both a 3-13, they will draft first.

whoa! IF we are 3-13

2-14 gets us #3 and Herm and Gun fired.

**cdcox** · 12-21-2008, 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King_Chief_Fan

whoa! IF we are 3-13

2-14 gets us #3 and Herm and Gun fired.

Well, we are playing the Bengals, so who knows.

I think all signs point to Herm being gone next year regardless of the outcome of that game.

**dirk digler** · 12-21-2008, 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox

I just checked and it is mathematically impossible for us to have a weaker SOS than Seattle. If we are both a 3-13, they will draft first.

Great info thanks. So basically we can't do worse than 4th and no better than 2.

MatriculatingHank · 12-21-2008, 04:42 PM

Here's my view (for what it's worth).. I don't think it will really matter if we pick 2nd or 3rd. The Lions will pick Stafford if he comes out. The Rams are going to go for an offensive lineman. Any comments???

kcpasco · 12-21-2008, 04:48 PM

What is Seattle in need of?

RINGLEADER · 12-21-2008, 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief77

As young as the defense already is, I would like to see us add a few vets with leadership qualities, a real DC, and maybe a young LB or two in the draft. I hope we focus on QB, OT, and LB in the first 3 rounds. Lets sell out and get a veteran DE in free agency.

I'd be okay with that -- even though I think Thigpen is showing enough to get a shot at being the starter next season I also don't mind grabbing a QB in the first round...

That's if there is a QB worth picking with the second or third pick of course...

RINGLEADER · 12-21-2008, 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla

so the rams are looking at QB?

If I was them I would be. At the very least I'd pretend I was to see if you could get something in trade.

ClevelandBronco · 12-21-2008, 04:58 PM

Bad news. You guys have a pretty darned good chance of winning next week.

Halfcan · 12-21-2008, 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan

It really doesn't matter where we pick. We need to make a major play to move up for Stafford.

What about this Defense-that should be the priority imo.

Halfcan · 12-21-2008, 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ClevelandBronco

Bad news. You guys have a pretty darned good chance of winning next week.

We will probably be up by 5 tds with 3 minutes to play and miss 5 straight onside kicks that lead to TD's.

Herm will have that same bewildered look he always does-and say something after the game like-we just need to work harder-blah blah blah

ping2000 · 12-21-2008, 05:08 PM

Chiefs will surrender first round pick in return for permanent rights to Herm and Dick Curl. Then the earth will explode.

FD · 12-21-2008, 05:45 PM

I think the Rams take an OT for sure, so don't worry too much about them.

**Baby Lee** · 12-21-2008, 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan

We will probably be up by 5 tds with 3 minutes to play and miss 5 straight onside kicks that lead to TD's.

Herm will have that same bewildered look he always does-and say something after the game like-we just need to work harder-blah blah blah

Did anyone catch the replay of that TX HS FB game, they replayed it because it was played on Cowboys' field and their stadium is closing.

Down around 24 with 3 minutes left, score and recover 3 [three!!] onside kicks to go up four. So they kick off regular, and the other team returns the kick for a TD.

**morphius** · 12-21-2008, 06:20 PM

I don't think we can pick lower than 3rd with the Raiders and Seahawks both winning today with 4 wins, and even a win next week keeps Cincy above us with their 1.5 game lead.

StcChief · 12-21-2008, 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan

It really doesn't matter where we pick. We need to make a major play to move up for Stafford.

take the Stafford idea and stick it. We aren't drafting him period.

12-21-2008, 04:14 PM
RINGLEADER In Search of a Life Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Confusion, USA Casino cash: $8070503	So We're Picking Somewhere Between 2 and 4 Correct? It's between us, the Rams, and Seahawks, correct? If we lose next week and: Rams win we pick 2 Rams lose we pick 3 If we win next week and: Seahawks lose we pick 4 Is that correct?
Posts: 48,491

12-21-2008, 04:42 PM	#19
MatriculatingHank Veteran Join Date: Nov 2008 Casino cash: $-1205142	Here's my view (for what it's worth).. I don't think it will really matter if we pick 2nd or 3rd. The Lions will pick Stafford if he comes out. The Rams are going to go for an offensive lineman. Any comments???
Posts: 1,241

12-21-2008, 04:48 PM	#20
kcpasco MVP Join Date: Sep 2007 Casino cash: $6143463	What is Seattle in need of?
Posts: 15,945

12-21-2008, 04:58 PM	#23
ClevelandBronco I'm with the banned. Join Date: Sep 2006 Casino cash: $5658955	Bad news. You guys have a pretty darned good chance of winning next week.
Posts: 28,113

12-21-2008, 05:08 PM	#26
ping2000 Changes pants while driving Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Washington D.C. Casino cash: $2240495	Chiefs will surrender first round pick in return for permanent rights to Herm and Dick Curl. Then the earth will explode.
Posts: 17,794

12-21-2008, 05:45 PM	#27
FD Veteran Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Indiana Casino cash: $9372813	I think the Rams take an OT for sure, so don't worry too much about them.
Posts: 4,440

12-21-2008, 06:20 PM	#29
morphius World's finest morphius Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $5795027	I don't think we can pick lower than 3rd with the Raiders and Seahawks both winning today with 4 wins, and even a win next week keeps Cincy above us with their 1.5 game lead.
Posts: 26,022