Jackson? - Page 2

Mr. Arrowhead · 04-26-2009, 07:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccogoo

Super.

So let's under utilize these guys next season and lose any potential trade value that they might have had.

I hope all you "Jesus" Curry people are happy now.

Third defensive end in three years in the top two rounds. Plus a DT in the top five last year who is going to have to be converted to a DE.

Just ****ing super.

go find a new team

htismaqe · 04-26-2009, 07:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Arrowhead

go find a new team

Haven't you heard? We need Curry to make it to the Super Bowl this year.

KCrockaholic · 04-26-2009, 12:19 AM

After reading Jackson's interview, I like the guy a lot more now. Im beginning to like the thought of Jackson as our pick.

**DaneMcCloud** · 04-28-2009, 11:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcrockaholic4life

After reading Jackson's interview, I like the guy a lot more now. Im beginning to like the thought of Jackson as our pick.

You're ****ing stupid.

Who gives a rat's ass what the guy has to say?

He's a 5 tech taken at #3 overall.

He better be the baddest mother****er on the planet on the field or he's a complete bust.

Saccopoo · 04-26-2009, 12:34 AM

And Baltimore gets Oher and Kruger with their first two picks...

**** me.

And we pick a 3-4 DE with the third pick?

And Green Bay pisses away a second and two thirds to move up to get a special teams standout?

And we pick a 3-4 DE, a guy that is meant to be a speed bump, a pile of flotsam, at the #3 spot?

**** me running.

bdeg · 04-26-2009, 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccogoo

And Baltimore gets Oher and Kruger with their first two picks...

**** me.

And we pick a 3-4 DE with the third pick?

And Green Bay pisses away a second and two thirds to move up to get a special teams standout?

And we pick a 3-4 DE, a guy that is meant to be a speed bump, a pile of flotsam, at the #3 spot?

**** me running.

Baltimore lucked out and damn that team is stacked for the next 10 years. Wow.

thing is, our linebackers are servicable, something you can't say about the DL. if we'd gone into the season with them we would've gotten run the f over all over again. When I think about it, there were a TON of quality olb's in this draft, maybe we were hoping one would slide later. You can't say that about 3-4 de's. Got some real physical guys, must be depending on scheme to get sacks next season, I can only hope we get some good 3-4 lb's next year.

MoreLemonPledge · 04-26-2009, 06:53 PM

I'm pissed. We should have drafted somebody that we can shoehorn onto our team regardless of how he fit. I mean, seriously. Mel Kiper, Jr. and Todd McShay both had Jackson lower on their big board than 3. It just makes no sense.

Now we're stuck with a player that fits perfectly into what we're transitioning to. That sucks. I would have much rather had another OLB or another QB or another WR.

/sarcasm (obviously?)

kcxiv · 04-28-2009, 11:20 PM

Saccago got owned by Htismaqe. lol. Always nice to watch such awesome ownage, that they have nothing for a comeback.

**DaneMcCloud** · 04-28-2009, 11:35 PM

I can't ****ing believe it but I agree with Saccogoo.

This was a ****ing horrific draft. Pioli and Haley decided to turn their back on the existing young roster. They decided to **** the Chiefs and do it their way.

Personally, I'm ****ing pissed. The Chiefs could have had Sanchez, Unger, Urbick, Murphy, Ingram, Ellison and Louis to shore up their offense for YEARS.

Instead, they have some questionable guys at DE, a questionable CB (**** ME; like Flowers, Carr and Leggett are somehow inadequate?) and a ****ing right tackle that was on NO ONE'S radar.

Pioli better know something. Otherwise, he's going to look more foolish than Carl Peterson.

At least Peterson drafted a Hall of Famer in his first draft.

htismaqe · 04-29-2009, 07:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

I can't ****ing believe it but I agree with Saccogoo.

This was a ****ing horrific draft. Pioli and Haley decided to turn their back on the existing young roster. They decided to **** the Chiefs and do it their way.

Personally, I'm ****ing pissed. The Chiefs could have had Sanchez, Unger, Urbick, Murphy, Ingram, Ellison and Louis to shore up their offense for YEARS.

Instead, they have some questionable guys at DE, a questionable CB (**** ME; like Flowers, Carr and Leggett are somehow inadequate?) and a ****ing right tackle that was on NO ONE'S radar.

Pioli better know something. Otherwise, he's going to look more foolish than Carl Peterson.

At least Peterson drafted a Hall of Famer in his first draft.

You agree with him?

You HONESTLY think we'd be better off with Curry?

Get ahold of yourself Dane.

kcxiv · 04-29-2009, 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe

You agree with him?

You HONESTLY think we'd be better off with Curry?

Get ahold of yourself Dane.

You know dane's grumpy ass over reacts to everything.

Like it or not we are basically starting from square 1. Herm tried to build and failed ****ing miserably, thats why he's not around.

If it takes a few years, then so be it, we are going on 40 ****ing years anyways. So what if its a few more.

Reerun_KC · 05-02-2009, 05:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

I can't ****ing believe it but I agree with Saccogoo.

This was a ****ing horrific draft. Pioli and Haley decided to turn their back on the existing young roster. They decided to **** the Chiefs and do it their way.

Personally, I'm ****ing pissed. The Chiefs could have had Sanchez, Unger, Urbick, Murphy, Ingram, Ellison and Louis to shore up their offense for YEARS.

Instead, they have some questionable guys at DE, a questionable CB (**** ME; like Flowers, Carr and Leggett are somehow inadequate?) and a ****ing right tackle that was on NO ONE'S radar.

Pioli better know something. Otherwise, he's going to look more foolish than Carl Peterson.

At least Peterson drafted a Hall of Famer in his first draft.

WOW what a rant Dane....

Yes I am still pissed we still dont have a QBoTF on the roster...

htismaqe · 05-02-2009, 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC

WOW what a rant Dane....

Yes I am still pissed we still dont have a QBoTF on the roster...

We have a POTENTIAL QBotF on the roster, whether you want to admit it or not.

Reerun_KC · 05-02-2009, 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe

We have a POTENTIAL QBotF on the roster, whether you want to admit it or not.

Um Huard was released...

Archie Bunker · 04-29-2009, 08:35 AM

Anyone know what happened after his Soph. year to cause such a drop in sacks? Going from 10 one year to 8.5 combined over the next 2 is quite a drop.

Scheme change? Fluke?

04-26-2009, 12:34 AM	#5
Saccopoo Kindness in words... Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Zion Casino cash: $10025483	And Baltimore gets Oher and Kruger with their first two picks... ** me. And we pick a 3-4 DE with the third pick? And Green Bay pisses away a second and two thirds to move up to get a special teams standout? And we pick a 3-4 DE, a guy that is meant to be a speed bump, a pile of flotsam, at the #3 spot? ** me running.
Posts: 15,450

04-26-2009, 06:53 PM	#7
MoreLemonPledge M-I-Z S-E-C Join Date: Apr 2009 Casino cash: $10004927	I'm pissed. We should have drafted somebody that we can shoehorn onto our team regardless of how he fit. I mean, seriously. Mel Kiper, Jr. and Todd McShay both had Jackson lower on their big board than 3. It just makes no sense. Now we're stuck with a player that fits perfectly into what we're transitioning to. That sucks. I would have much rather had another OLB or another QB or another WR. /sarcasm (obviously?)
Posts: 6,039

04-28-2009, 11:20 PM	#8
kcxiv In Search of a Life Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Central Valley, Cali Casino cash: $8697996	Saccago got owned by Htismaqe. lol. Always nice to watch such awesome ownage, that they have nothing for a comeback.
Posts: 29,111

04-28-2009, 11:35 PM	#9
DaneMcCloud Supporter Join Date: Sep 2000 Location: Hollywood, CA Casino cash: $10053648	I can't **ing believe it but I agree with Saccogoo. This was a ing horrific draft. Pioli and Haley decided to turn their back on the existing young roster. They decided to the Chiefs and do it their way. Personally, I'm ing pissed. The Chiefs could have had Sanchez, Unger, Urbick, Murphy, Ingram, Ellison and Louis to shore up their offense for YEARS. Instead, they have some questionable guys at DE, a questionable CB ( ME; like Flowers, Carr and Leggett are somehow inadequate?) and a **ing right tackle that was on NO ONE'S radar. Pioli better know something. Otherwise, he's going to look more foolish than Carl Peterson. At least Peterson drafted a Hall of Famer in his first draft.
Posts: 88,960

04-29-2009, 08:35 AM	#15
Archie Bunker The Wait Is Over Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Random Small Town Casino cash: $-701022	Anyone know what happened after his Soph. year to cause such a drop in sacks? Going from 10 one year to 8.5 combined over the next 2 is quite a drop. Scheme change? Fluke?
Posts: 6,219

04-26-2009, 12:19 AM	#3
KCrockaholic Sarcasm Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Olathe Casino cash: $3362900	After reading Jackson's interview, I like the guy a lot more now. Im beginning to like the thought of Jackson as our pick.
Posts: 21,179