Chiefs Would the Chiefs have won this game with Haley? - Page 2

**Buck** · 12-18-2011, 03:07 PM

Just want your opinion.

Marcellus · 12-18-2011, 03:13 PM

I voted yes under the assumption Haley starts Orton. That was really the only difference in the team.

memyselfI · 12-18-2011, 03:15 PM

Two crack smokers here.

Okie_Apparition · 12-18-2011, 03:15 PM

He would've gone for an onsides kick

**DaFace** · 12-18-2011, 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach|

I understand why people would disagree with this but...I don't think this is an indictment of Haley. I think *change* was the catalyst for success for sure.

Yup.

King_Chief_Fan · 12-18-2011, 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus

I voted yes under the assumption Haley starts Orton. That was really the only difference in the team.

same here.......

I voted yes for that reason.

However, he would have started Palko and then no.

Marcellus · 12-18-2011, 03:18 PM

Its funny how people will point at this game as use it as an absolute as Haley was the only issue.

Orton kept the offense moving. The defense was just like they have been with less time on the field to wear them out.

Orton was the only difference in the team.

**DaFace** · 12-18-2011, 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by King_Chief_Fan

same here.......

I voted yes for that reason.

However, he would have started Palko and then no.

I don't understand this assumption. What evidence do we have that that would have been the case?

jd1020 · 12-18-2011, 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace

I don't understand this assumption. What evidence do we have that that would have been the case?

Maybe the evidence of Palko starting every game Haley was here after Cassel was injured?

King_Chief_Fan · 12-18-2011, 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace

I don't understand this assumption. What evidence do we have that that would have been the case?

assumption only, no evidence....I learned a long time ago, that evidence has no place on Chiefs Planet....you new here?

okcchief · 12-18-2011, 03:23 PM

I say no. Play calling was better and the team was behind Romeo. Haley's stubborn as may have not started Orton.

Papi · 12-18-2011, 03:25 PM

Haley who? In my mind I've erased the abortion that occurred before this game.

Lonewolf Ed · 12-18-2011, 03:26 PM

No. Haley would not have run the plays where the tight ends caught deep passes, nor would he have run screens to the fullback. More changes need to be made, but it is clear that Haley was a problem in and of himself.

**DaFace** · 12-18-2011, 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020

Maybe the evidence of Palko starting every game Haley was here after Cassel was injured?

Orton is a better QB than Palko or Stanzi. I know that's hard to understand.

JonesCrusher · 12-18-2011, 03:27 PM

You know, I'm curious that if that were the dolts entering the 4th qtr with a lead what would have happened. Just curious..................rivers..............vagina.....................norv........................ choke....................troll

memyselfI · 12-18-2011, 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Papi

Haley who? In my mind I've erased the abortion that occurred before this game.

Good plan. I probably should of but I rather enjoy the fact that his team did the UNTHINKABLE the first game after his ass was sent packing.

View Poll Results: ?
Yes	14	10.69%
No	117	89.31%
Voters: 131. You may not vote on this poll

12-18-2011, 03:07 PM
Buck Take a Chill Pill Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: South Carolina Casino cash: $8199900	Would the Chiefs have won this game with Haley? Just want your opinion.
Posts: 44,564

12-18-2011, 03:13 PM	#16
Marcellus Diablo Negro Join Date: Sep 2003 Casino cash: $2582662	I voted yes under the assumption Haley starts Orton. That was really the only difference in the team.
Posts: 69,791

12-18-2011, 03:15 PM	#17
memyselfI CHANGEd your mind yet???? Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Lunatics Anonymous Casino cash: $10005234	Two crack smokers here. __________________ Meet the new boss same as the old boss. BigChiefDave:"Anyone who thought we would only be in Iraq for a few years is either stoned or just stoopid." "It is unknowable how long that conflict will last. It could last 6 days, 6 wks. I doubt 6 mths." Rummy 2/7/03
Posts: 32,000

12-18-2011, 03:15 PM	#18
Okie_Apparition Banned Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: floatin cobwebs n the sky Casino cash: $10004900	He would've gone for an onsides kick
Posts: 7,012

12-18-2011, 03:18 PM	#21
Marcellus Diablo Negro Join Date: Sep 2003 Casino cash: $2582662	Its funny how people will point at this game as use it as an absolute as Haley was the only issue. Orton kept the offense moving. The defense was just like they have been with less time on the field to wear them out. Orton was the only difference in the team.
Posts: 69,791

12-18-2011, 03:23 PM	#25
okcchief MVP Join Date: Jul 2008 Casino cash: $9849890	I say no. Play calling was better and the team was behind Romeo. Haley's stubborn as may have not started Orton.
Posts: 6,703

12-18-2011, 03:25 PM	#26
Papi Veteran Join Date: Feb 2006 Casino cash: $5045522	Haley who? In my mind I've erased the abortion that occurred before this game.
Posts: 1,625

12-18-2011, 03:26 PM	#27
Lonewolf Ed Veteran Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Olathe, KS Casino cash: $10606233	No. Haley would not have run the plays where the tight ends caught deep passes, nor would he have run screens to the fullback. More changes need to be made, but it is clear that Haley was a problem in and of himself.
Posts: 3,774

12-18-2011, 03:27 PM	#29
JonesCrusher Knock Knock Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Southeast Wisconsin Casino cash: $10006550	You know, I'm curious that if that were the dolts entering the 4th qtr with a lead what would have happened. Just curious..................rivers..............vagina.....................norv........................ choke....................troll
Posts: 771