The Fatal Flaw In Romeo Crennel’s Defense

[T-post Tom]

by Andrew Crocker (ArrowheadAddict.com)

Having been in this business for something approaching two decades, Kansas City Chiefs head coach Romeo Crennel has a signature defensive scheme that has been called many things. It is called reactive. It’s called bend-but-don’t-break. It’s called technique-oriented. It’s been praised by supporters to be the ultimate team-approach to successful defense, utiliting the ability of all eleven defenders to elevate the play of all their teammates. It’s been criticized by detractors as being unaggressive, more concerned with preventing big plays than promoting big stops, playing on your heels instead of pinning your ears back.

The Two-Gap

However you term it, it truly is a unique defensive style that stands in stark contrast to almost the entirety of other NFL defensive schemes, and fewer have promoted it more successfully than Crennel.

His style is termed the “two-gap 3-4″ defense. At its base, that means you have three lineman with their hands in the dirt, typically two defensive ends that are big and strong enough to take on offensive tackles and tall enough to deter passes by the quarterback in the pocket (think of Tyson Jackson’s prototypical 6’4″, 296 lbs frame), and a humongous, bulky nose tackle that is built for getting low, absorbing punishment and administering immediate push against a hopelessly outsized center (think of Jerrell Powe’s prototypical 6’2″, 331 lbs frame). Then you have four linebackers: two passrushers on the edge (one who is a more one-dimensional pocket assaulter, and the other who is a swiss army knife of abilities), and two in the middle (one who is more of a line of scrimmage attacker, and the other who is more coverage-oriented). This earns Crennel’s defense the “3-4″ moniker, for those who didn’t already know.

But roughly half the teams in the NFL play with a 3-4 arrangment. It’s Crennel’s two-gap approach is what truly sets this defense apart from every other style in the NFL.

From the Bears’ cover 2, to the Eagle’s wide 9, to the Texans’ one-gap, to the Patriots’ hybrid, to countless other 4-3 and 3-4 teams, the name of the game is very simple for the defensive line: get upfield. The players might line-up at different points along the defensive line. They might be bigger (3-4 nose tackles), smaller (cover 2 passrushers), ends, tackles, or rushbackers. But they all want to disrupt the pocket and get upfield.

Not so with the two-gap.

Think of this as your typical offensive line:

(C Gap) RT (B Gap) RG (A Gap) C (A Gap) LG (B Gap) LT (C Gap)

This is a comprehensive listing of the “gaps” in an offensive line. The “A” gap is between the center and guard, the “B” gap is between the guard and tackle. Most defenses in the NFL tell their defensive lineman to shoot a gap, which would either penetrate the pocket or at least disrupt the offensive line’s blocking assignments. Some defenses give a defensive tackle the job of occupying blockers, or “two-gapping,” meaning they focus less on getting upfield, and focus more with minding two gaps and clogging the lanes, offensive lineman be damned.

This two-gap strategy asks every single one of its defensive lineman to do exactly that. It turns the traditional role of the defensive lineman from pocket invader to space occupying, gap eater. There’s a reason young bucks like Tyson Jackson and Dontari Poe take a long time to adjust to it, the techniques involved in this are completely different than the simple “get up and go” of more attack-oriented defensive lines. (By my count, only four other teams in the NFL share this defensive style: Ravens, Jets, Dolphins, and now the Colts.)

The complexity of all of this aside, there is one thing needed to make this work. One thing needed to turn this defensive style, unique as it is, into an offense-wrecking machine:

The defensive linemen must occupy offensive linemen.

It’s that simple. It’s the first domino for the entire scheme to make sense. If these defensive linemen can force offensive lineman to double-team them, it frees up the linebackers behind them and to their flanks to make plays. If Glenn Dorsey and Jackson play their roles properly, Tamba Hali and Justin Houston are battling tight ends and fullbacks en route to the QB, rather than massive, athletic offensive tackles. If Poe can demand maximum attention in the interior of the line, it allows Derrick Johnson to flow to the ball freely. It therefore cuts down on the amount of time secondaries have to cover receivers. It allows the safeties to clamp down open spaces faster. The key to it all is that the defensive linemen must absorb multiple offensive linemen every play.

The 2012 Preseason Chiefs Defensive Line

But it’s a delicate ecosystem. If the defensive linemen do not regularly command double- and triple-teams, then the defensive line is getting no penetration and the linebackers are battling far too much on every play. Passing lanes will be bigger, and running the ball gets easier. In other words, if the defensive line can’t work, nothing works.

That’s what the 2012 preseason is teaching us. And if the problems we’re experiencing here carry over to the regular season, it may spell either the failure of this defense in Kansas City, or even worse, it may suggest that this defense is officially too antiquated to exist anymore in the modern NFL.

But during the first preseason game hosting the Arizona Cardinals, this was not a problem. The Cardinals bought the just-now-gaining-traction notion that Dorsey and Jackson are formidable talents worthy of maximum attention, and saw our nose tackle lineup of Anthony Toribio (fairly big), Dontari Poe (huge), and Jerrell Powe (very large) and convinced themselves that double-teaming would be a necessity.

We slaughtered them. First-team, second-team, third-team. Our rushbackers racked up sacks by the quarter, the Cards couldn’t run the ball, it was glorious. It was the true example of (a.) how talented our defense is, and (b.) how this scheme can maximize teamwork to create as hostile an environment for offenses as there can be in this league.

The Rams, too, tried taking on our defensive linemen two-at-a-time for much of the first half of the Chiefs second preseason game in St. Louis. The result was a pretty fair degree of success; despite the box score, the Rams had to convert two fourth downs to score their two touchdowns. The few runs broken off by Steven Jackson were anomolies of unusually missed assignments. The base lineup of Jackson, Toribio, and Dorsey were again a bit too much for the Rams’ offensive front to handle.

The second half of the Rams game, however, is where everything took a turn.

With a second-team defensive line setup of Ropati Pitoitua, Poe, and Amon Gordon, the Rams offense decided to try an experiment: what if we just didn’t double team them at all, ever?

The results were disasterous and frustrating to watch. The Rams single-teamed all three defensive lineman for their time on the field, and constantly launched both of their guards into the Chiefs linebackers (who were already struggling to begin with). Disasterously, none of the three players, with the rare exception of Gordon, were able to free themselves from their blockers, rarely ever being able to clog anything, and runners were frequently breaking into the second level as linebackers struggled to come off their blocks.

The Rams didn’t even make a pretense of it. They understood our depth and speed on the outside, so they ran right down our throats for the first few drives, to the visible frustration of players like Poe.

In the passing game, again, none of the linemen were double-teamed. All rushbackers were snagged by tackles before they could ever get into a serious move, and blitzers were easily absorbed by whomever the Rams kept in the backfield. By stymying our linemen with one blocker, the Rams opened everything up — and shut us down.

The Seahawks, perhaps noticing this on tape, decided that they’d repeat the same formula, this time against our starters, with consistently positive results. The Seahawks simply took the risk, figuring they had no shot if they had to double-team our 1′s. They figured it would be better to gamble on the chance the defensive line would disrupt them in one-on-one’s, while banking on the fact that they probably wouldn’t.

There were a few instances in short yardage where the offensive line felt the need to double players like Dontari Poe, and virtually every time the Chiefs made them pay. But for the vast majority of the first half, the Seahawks simply ignored double-teaming, which freed up LT Russell Okung to snag Hali on the edge, and allowed the guards to assault our linebackers and safeties in the run game.

There lies a fundamental flaw here: teams are starting to simply refuse doubling our defensive linemen. If that happens, neither of our starting ends (Dorsey and Jackson) have proven able to disengage and punish offenses for their lack of respect. Toribio’s ability to demand double teams has weakened considerably in light of his injury, and Dontari Poe still has miles to go before he can harness that ability.

Only third string NT Jerrell Powe has really shown the power and burst necessary to command double teams, but if teams think their best shot is just going one-on-one with everybody, it almost doesn’t matter who you put out there. Teams will continue to gamble that your linemen won’t adjust, and the entire defense will risk exposure as a result.

Is the problem with our players? Is it with the scheme? That answer is not yet clear.

What is clear is that this has been a Jekyll and Hyde defense all preseason, and it’s likely to stay that way if Romeo Crennel can’t force offenses to respect his defensive line.

http://arrowheadaddict.com/2012/08/2...nnels-defense/

[WhiteWhale]

Originally Posted by BlackBob

The rule to remember is that the object is to get the OLBs one on one in passing downs.

If we aren't rushing the anyone else and it is 5 vs. 5 (3 d-linemen and 2 OLBs), 90% of the time the d-line's job is to rush the QB.

We're not in our base 34 on 'passing downs'.

[Black Bob]

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale

We're not in our base 34 on 'passing downs'.

Sometimes we are. Again, you can't define what Romeo is doing. Against Atlanta, you will probably hardly see the 3-4 at all. Also, passing downs aren't only on 3rd down. If they were, they wouldn't call them passing downs. For example, 2nd and 11is a passing down more often than not

[keg in kc]

The only "fatal flaw" I see is basing the entire article on something that happened in the second half of a preseason game, as if that's somehow an indication of anything.

[BoneKrusher]

wouldn't it be easier to send everyone after the QB and be alert to stop the RB on their way?
just sayin'.

[Deberg_1990]

They fatal flaw of this defense is we need more talented defensive linemen and its shame we spent such high picks and money on ones who underperform.

[BoneKrusher]

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990

They fatal flaw of this defense is we need more talented defensive linemen and its shame we spent such high picks and money on ones who underperform.

maybe it's the LSU connection?

[jspchief]

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale

You guys realize that KC doesn't often 2 gap on passing downs right?

The problem is every down is a passing down in today's NFL. If you're waiting until 3rd and long to put in your sub package that's effective against the pass, you're going to see your D get torched by 1st and 2nd down passes.

It happened to us a lot last year. I'm not going to pretend to know what Crennel is asking his guys to do on individual plays. What I do know is the effectiveness of our edge rushers is greatly diminished because the interior line rarely collapses the pocket. How often do we see Hali getting around his guy only to have the QB step up into a nice pocket to complete his pass? And not only does it make Hali's job tougher, it makes the QB's job easier. When the opposing QB doesn't have to worry about what's directly in front of him, it makes it easier to focus downfield.

Whether it's by design, or the front 3 aren't getting it done, the current incarnation of our defense isn't working very well. Something has to change to make that pocket a less comfortable place for the QB, and we can't just rely on changing it in obvious passing downs.

[King_Chief_Fan]

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990

They fatal flaw of this defense is we need more talented defensive linemen and its shame we spent such high picks and money on ones who underperform.

yup...pre-season look at the D says uh oh.

[Chiefnj2]

Right now the fatal flaw is injuries, lack of depth and a small amount of ganja.

There's actually a chance that a guy who hasn't played football in 3 years will be starting at CB week 1 against the Falcons.

[thabear04]

Originally Posted by B_Ambuehl

That article was written by someone that really doesn't understand the defensive scheme or offensive blocking assignments, but the basic premise is roughly accurate. Moreso that style of 3-4 could be considered somewhat outdated, and not so much because we have bad talent. It's a conservative defense that doesn't beat itself, but but its design really isn't set up to wreck opposing offenses either.

It was by Andrew Crocker from Arrowhead Addict

[Mr. Laz]

didn't read that whole dam thing, but i assume ....


that i agree with disliking the fact that a 2-gap 3-4 scheme basically sacrifices 3 guys to make the other 8 guys better. It's like playing 11 vrs 8 and it seems to put the defense at a disadvantage.

from the snap of the ball on each play, you know you aren't getting a pass rush from 3 or the 4 guys on the DLine. Big sacrifice.

[xztop12]

interesting post it highlights why its so imperative that we get good front 3... which im not sure we have now.

[Frosty]

Originally Posted by T-post Tom

The Seahawks, perhaps noticing this on tape, decided that they’d repeat the same formula, this time against our starters, with consistently positive results.

Just wanted to point out that Seattle really didn't face the Chiefs' starting d-line. Jackson barely played (first series only, iirc), Toribio went out early with an ankle injury and Dorsey went out later with a knee.

It does show that either the backups don't know the scheme completely yet or just aren't very talented.

[Ace Gunner]

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale

You guys realize that KC doesn't often 2 gap on passing downs right?

If you are referring to the 2 DL alignments -- yes, those guys are two gapping at the snap. If the QB is in his gap with no blocker then ya, the DL is expected to shoot and tackle. But not leaving his gaps.

Also, Romeo only cooks up these 2 DL schemes when he needs to. Meaning, when he doesn't have the players he needs to just run base 3 DL, he will replace a DL player with a LB or DB etc.

But that is not how this defense normally lines up.

[Buckweath]

??? This Chiefs defense was the 4th best defense (without Berry) for the second half of last season and you come here and say the defense has a fatal flaw.. I expect great things from this defense. I really hope it's a top 5 unit and at worst it is a top 10 unit IMO.