Chiefs Come on Bradford! Get in the draft! - Page 3

Red Dawg · 01-07-2009, 05:17 PM

Lions take Bradford and we can get Stafford.

Mecca · 01-07-2009, 06:33 PM

Just telling you what he said, according to him he thinks Sanchez should be ahead of Bradford but Stafford is so far ahead of them it's not funny, that's how he put it.

milkman · 01-07-2009, 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gravedigger

Werd, if someone rates Sanchez higher than Stafford they are an idiot and enamored with USC football talent. I would take an Olineman or Maluaga over Sanchez if Stafford didnt fall to us, BUT LUCKILY Stafford will be ours!

Sanchez has a strong arm, albeit not as strong as Stafford's, but plenty strong enough, is extremely accurate, both standing in the pocket and on the run, and is more mature and more NFL ready than either Stafford or Bradford.

**OnTheWarpath15** · 01-07-2009, 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

Just telling you what he said, according to him he thinks Sanchez should be ahead of Bradford but Stafford is so far ahead of them it's not funny, that's how he put it.

Between us, do you agree?

I know you'll catch heat if you say you don't, just because of the USC connection - but be honest.

beach tribe · 01-07-2009, 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

Or, it could just be that Sanchez doesn't have the warts that Stafford does.

When people speak of Sanchez, you don't hear words/phrases like "inconsistent", "accuracy", "footwork" or "questionable decision making."

If Sanchez had started the past 3 seasons at USC, it wouldn't be close, IMO. It's his one huge knock.

I also think that if he had started those years he would have more of a body of work for scouts to tear down.

Mecca · 01-07-2009, 06:38 PM

I'll list off some of his quotes if you want to comment on those..

Question:You don't think he could challenge Stafford as of being a Top 3 pick, Scott?

No, he is firmly behind Stafford.

Like I said though, if I included everyone in my rankings Sanchez would be ahead of Bradford.

He has fewer question marks and just as much upside, if not more.

I really don't understand why people are so down on Stafford...

I guess he has a case of senior-itis, even though he isn't a senior. He's been such a highly rated prospect for so long that people are picking him apart and looking for negatives.

As much as I like Stafford I concede that in time Sanchez has the talent to be as good or better. Still, one year of starting experience is scary.

eazyb81 · 01-07-2009, 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

Sanchez has a strong arm, albeit not as strong as Stafford's, but plenty strong enough, is extremely accurate, both standing in the pocket and on the run, and is more mature and more NFL ready than either Stafford or Bradford.

What makes you think this in comparison to Stafford?

beach tribe · 01-07-2009, 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

Sanchez has a strong arm, albeit not as strong as Stafford's, but plenty strong enough, is extremely accurate, both standing in the pocket and on the run, and is more mature and more NFL ready than either Stafford or Bradford.

He doesn't have the starting exp., but he has been practicing against USCs D, and is 2 years older than Stafford.

EDit: That's why I think he will be better his first year in the pros, but Stafford ends up being the best QB of this class.

Sure-Oz · 01-07-2009, 06:40 PM

Well i hope Sanchez comes out...werent we supposed to hear any day now?

Sanchez or Stafford please

**OnTheWarpath15** · 01-07-2009, 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

I'll list off some of his quotes if you want to comment on those..

Question:You don't think he could challenge Stafford as of being a Top 3 pick, Scott?

No, he is firmly behind Stafford.

Like I said though, if I included everyone in my rankings Sanchez would be ahead of Bradford.

He has fewer question marks and just as much upside, if not more.

I really don't understand why people are so down on Stafford...

I guess he has a case of senior-itis, even though he isn't a senior. He's been such a highly rated prospect for so long that people are picking him apart and looking for negatives.

As much as I like Stafford I concede that in time Sanchez has the talent to be as good or better. Still, one year of starting experience is scary.

No, I'd like to know if you agree with Scott Wright.

milkman · 01-07-2009, 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eazyb81

What makes you think this in comparison to Stafford?

It's just an opinion based on the kind of composure he has in the pocket, and the respect and confidence he seems to garner from his teammates.

I also believe that Stafford's inconsistent decision making are due to a lack of maturity, that he'll grow out of.

People just seem to forget that he is still only 20 years old.

eazyb81 · 01-07-2009, 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe

He doesn't have the starting exp., but he has been practicing against USCs D, and is 2 years older than Stafford.

EDit: That's why I think he will be better his first year in the pros, but Stafford ends up being the best QB of this class.

He's only 1 year older than Stafford, and Stafford has 2 more years of starting experience.

Mecca · 01-07-2009, 06:43 PM

Eh I think it's close, if we're drafting right now I think Stafford deserves to be the higher rated player, he's the one with much much more game tape to study.

He did what people said he needed to do this year to improve himself he's gotten better every year, I think Stafford at this stage is a better prospect not by a huge degree though.

Sure-Oz · 01-07-2009, 06:44 PM

i thought sanchez was 22 and stafford 20

Mecca · 01-07-2009, 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eazyb81

He's only 1 year older than Stafford, and Stafford has 2 more years of starting experience.

Isn't it closer to a year and a half? If you just glanced you'd think 2 since one is 86 and the other is 88.

Mecca · 01-07-2009, 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz

i thought sanchez was 22 and stafford 20

Yea it's because Stafford was born in I believe February and Sanchez was born in November I think...Stafford just hasn't gotten to his birthday yet.

01-07-2009, 05:17 PM
Red Dawg Going home eventually Join Date: Dec 2002 Casino cash: $3662858	Come on Bradford! Get in the draft! Lions take Bradford and we can get Stafford.
Posts: 31,126

01-07-2009, 06:33 PM	#31
Mecca Hockey Town Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Kansas City, Missouri Casino cash: $1257050	Just telling you what he said, according to him he thinks Sanchez should be ahead of Bradford but Stafford is so far ahead of them it's not funny, that's how he put it.
Posts: 112,387

01-07-2009, 06:38 PM	#35
Mecca Hockey Town Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Kansas City, Missouri Casino cash: $1257050	I'll list off some of his quotes if you want to comment on those.. Question:You don't think he could challenge Stafford as of being a Top 3 pick, Scott? No, he is firmly behind Stafford. Like I said though, if I included everyone in my rankings Sanchez would be ahead of Bradford. He has fewer question marks and just as much upside, if not more. I really don't understand why people are so down on Stafford... I guess he has a case of senior-itis, even though he isn't a senior. He's been such a highly rated prospect for so long that people are picking him apart and looking for negatives. As much as I like Stafford I concede that in time Sanchez has the talent to be as good or better. Still, one year of starting experience is scary.
Posts: 112,387

01-07-2009, 06:43 PM	#42
Mecca Hockey Town Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Kansas City, Missouri Casino cash: $1257050	Eh I think it's close, if we're drafting right now I think Stafford deserves to be the higher rated player, he's the one with much much more game tape to study. He did what people said he needed to do this year to improve himself he's gotten better every year, I think Stafford at this stage is a better prospect not by a huge degree though.
Posts: 112,387