|
01-13-2013, 12:50 AM | |
Rabbi Goldmann
Join Date: Nov 2012
Casino cash: $5450159
|
Broncos traded Kaepernick
Sorta:
On April 29, 2011, The San Francisco 49ers traded up with the Denver Broncos from the thirteenth pick in the second round (#45 overall) to select Colin Kaepernick as the fourth pick in the second round (#36 overall) at the 2011 NFL Draft. The Denver Broncos received picks 45, 108 and 141 overall in exchange for the 36th overall pick. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colin_Kaepernick |
Posts: 87,025
|
01-13-2013, 12:19 PM | #31 |
SuperBowl or bust
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: BF Iowa
Casino cash: $464088
|
He'd probably never see the field with the staff we had in place.
|
Posts: 47,400
|
01-13-2013, 12:21 PM | #32 |
Going home eventually
Join Date: Dec 2002
Casino cash: $3632858
|
That is just perfect.
__________________
If you're not first you're last! |
Posts: 31,167
|
01-13-2013, 01:35 PM | #33 |
Permitted
Join Date: Jul 2011
Casino cash: $10004900
|
|
Posts: 4,095
|
01-13-2013, 01:36 PM | #34 |
Shit
Join Date: Jun 2008
Casino cash: $10039067
|
|
Posts: 55,715
|
01-13-2013, 01:41 PM | #35 |
Starter
Join Date: Feb 2010
Casino cash: $10005142
|
How bout that Kaeper-keeper?!
Alright I need to go walk that one off |
Posts: 718
|
01-13-2013, 01:45 PM | #36 | |
Permitted
Join Date: Jul 2011
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Quote:
This is a case where it's technically true, but the Broncos didn't trade the pick with the intention of giving up the player. That's why I think it was a poor thread. Like my earlier example showed, did the panthers trade darelle revis, or did they trade the pick with the intention of getting more picks? |
|
Posts: 4,095
|
01-13-2013, 01:50 PM | #37 |
Permitted
Join Date: Jul 2011
Casino cash: $10004900
|
By that logic, you're effectively trading away any single player you don't choose while acquiring the one you do with your given pick.
Eh, **** it. Agree to disagree |
Posts: 4,095
|
01-13-2013, 01:52 PM | #38 |
He's Mahomie!
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Jax, FL
Casino cash: $10023443
|
Interesting. I just posted in another thread laughing about how Denver overspent for a 2 year old man when they could have had Russell Wilson too. So glad Pioli pissed off Peyton...
__________________
99.9% |
Posts: 17,387
|
01-13-2013, 01:58 PM | #39 |
NFL's #1 Ermines Fan
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: My house
Casino cash: $1808491
VARSITY
|
When you see him on interviews, Kaepernick reminds of me one of those little kids with that aging disease. He always wears a hat that's too big, and then he has kind of a big nose and close-set eyes. I think he's really five years old and everyone just assumes that he's NFL-eligible.
__________________
Active fan of the greatest team in NFL history. |
Posts: 142,657
|
01-13-2013, 02:12 PM | #40 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2001
Casino cash: $10004900
|
|
Posts: 26,959
|
01-13-2013, 02:18 PM | #41 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Chandler AZ
Casino cash: $1751004
|
Using a pick that high (no. 36) for a quarterback is risky and reckless, especially when you trade for that pick. It's much safer to use high picks for offensive line depth.
Regards, Scott DickHeadedPrickBalls |
Posts: 13,579
|
01-13-2013, 04:13 PM | #42 | |
Rabbi Goldmann
Join Date: Nov 2012
Casino cash: $5450159
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 87,025
|
01-13-2013, 05:12 PM | #43 |
Permitted
Join Date: Jul 2011
Casino cash: $10004900
|
You completely missed my point, which has nothing to do with Peyton Manning.
|
Posts: 4,095
|
01-13-2013, 05:18 PM | #44 |
Permitted
Join Date: Jul 2011
Casino cash: $10004900
|
"End result" has nothing to do with PM. The "end result" is passing on Kaep for Baldwin (in our case), and trading the pick where Kaep was taken(in denver's case). Thus, not having Kaepernick is the end result.
Do I really have to spoon feed you the point in order for you to understand it? |
Posts: 4,095
|
01-13-2013, 05:20 PM | #45 |
MVP
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sydney, Australia
Casino cash: $6108501
|
Nice
|
Posts: 13,753
|
|
|