|
|
View Poll Results: who do you prefer Albert or Long? | |||
stick with Branden Albert | 70 | 88.61% | |
switch to Jake Long | 9 | 11.39% | |
Voters: 79. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-22-2013, 05:40 PM | #31 |
'Tis my eye!
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Chiefsplanet
Casino cash: $10209900
|
|
Posts: 100,057
|
02-22-2013, 05:42 PM | #32 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dallas, Texas
Casino cash: $10004900
|
is Jordan Black still available?
|
Posts: 56,356
|
02-22-2013, 05:43 PM | #33 |
Indian Twitter
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Free Agency
Casino cash: $156198
|
__________________
[/SIGPIC] |
Posts: 15,348
|
02-22-2013, 05:43 PM | #34 |
Stroking to the SB Champs!
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Flatlands of Kansas
Casino cash: $1768962
|
If you have a choice, better the Devil you know, than the one you don't.
__________________
|
Posts: 39,805
|
02-22-2013, 05:47 PM | #35 | |
Custom User Title
Join Date: Nov 2008
Casino cash: $8795943
|
Quote:
If it's going to cost the same for both, I'd take Long in a heart beat. After he starts a few games for KC, you will be like |
|
Posts: 12,706
|
02-22-2013, 05:54 PM | #36 |
GBM 8-12-15
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Dayton, Oh.
Casino cash: $10052154
|
|
Posts: 59,997
|
02-22-2013, 05:55 PM | #37 |
Administrator
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Austin
Casino cash: $1395002
|
Assuming they sign for exactly the same amount(ridiculous) It comes down to health. Period. If both are completely healthy then it's Jake Long by a mile. You have to have some serious blind stupidity to think otherwise. There isn't anyone outside of KC who wouldn't laugh their ass off at the rampant homerism in this thread. That being saying... it looks more and more like Long won't ever be back to full health for a full season AND it's likely he will demand much more money than Albert... two solid reasons to keep Albert.
|
Posts: 19,788
|
02-22-2013, 05:57 PM | #38 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dallas, Texas
Casino cash: $10004900
|
we may be a bunch of rampant homers
but you're a Michigan fan so maybe there is a bit of rampant homerism for your undying love of Jake Long? |
Posts: 56,356
|
02-22-2013, 05:57 PM | #39 |
I'll be back.
Join Date: Nov 2002
Casino cash: $3210478
|
The ****? No, asshole.
Albert only had one bad game last season and it wasn't NEARLY as bad as Long was in either of those two contests.
__________________
Chiefs game films |
Posts: 285,914
|
02-22-2013, 05:59 PM | #40 | |
'Tis my eye!
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Chiefsplanet
Casino cash: $10209900
|
Quote:
1) It's not likely that Long will be fully healthy. He's showing signs of "breaking down". 2) Just based on their current salaries and what their cap number would be if tagged, Long could command money that's a good 150% of what Albert could get. |
|
Posts: 100,057
|
02-22-2013, 06:00 PM | #41 | |
GBM 8-12-15
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Dayton, Oh.
Casino cash: $10052154
|
Quote:
They've both been protecting shitty QBs their entire careers. Someone dig up sacks allowed. |
|
Posts: 59,997
|
02-22-2013, 06:01 PM | #42 |
Administrator
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Austin
Casino cash: $1395002
|
Of course I admit to that... but let's be realistic. This thread would be laughed at by EVERY other fan of every other team out there. Due to injuries, Jake Long has fallen off quite a bit the last couple of years but IF HEALTHY he is still a long ways above Albert. Of course Albert should be cheaper, healthier and still has potential to grow so the smart move is to resign him unless he demands a crazy contract.
|
Posts: 19,788
|
02-22-2013, 06:01 PM | #43 |
Say hello to my little friend
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Larryville
Casino cash: $9598422
|
|
Posts: 47,314
|
02-22-2013, 06:05 PM | #44 | |
Consuming CP souls
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Casino cash: $2518880
|
Quote:
__________________
****Official TFWdemB Trivia Commisioner**** |
|
Posts: 70,721
|
02-22-2013, 06:08 PM | #45 | |
▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓
Join Date: Jan 2009
Casino cash: $985743
|
Quote:
Fun fact: In 2012, Branden Albert allowed 1 sack in 12 games.... in 12 games, Jake Long allowed 7 sacks.
__________________
🏁 |
|
Posts: 64,206
|
|
|