What about the O? - Page 3

Gaz · 03-25-2005, 01:56 PM

We all know our Defense stunk in 2004, but it should not overshadow the fact that our Offense stalled at critical moments in several games.

So, it is Defense, Defense, Defense or do the Offense Homers get a seat at the banquet, too?

xoxo~
Gaz
Thowing the OHo’s a bone.

Coogs · 03-25-2005, 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj

I wouldn't be shocked if the Chiefs drafted Barron, Williams or Clayton in the first if any of them fell to 15.

Just for the heck of it, let's throw another scenario in here as well. IF, the 49ers make the trade situation listed in another thread with the Bolts, and IF the Browns as rumored decide to wait until the 2nd round to draft Auburns QB, and one of the top two QB's slide down the draft board to #15....

could get interesting. I would love it if Rogers name was added to the 3 guys you have listed as winding up potential Chiefs.

DenverChief · 03-25-2005, 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gochiefs

I think he's going to be a big factor in play-action and short-yardage situations. I think what we saw the Chiefs doing with Jason Dunn last year (i.e. Baltimore game) will be Wilson's role.

IIRC he was injured running a 10 yd route over the middle?

Coogs · 03-25-2005, 03:09 PM

And to answer Gaz's original question, If CB is adressed by the time of the draft, or if it looks like Law is going to be added after the draft, then the drat should be wide open.

Remember, we still have draft picks from last year who could/should factor into the improvement of the defense as well.

Hammock Parties · 03-25-2005, 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DenverChief

IIRC he was injured running a 10 yd route over the middle?

Yes, so?

DenverChief · 03-25-2005, 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gochiefs

Yes, so?

Those were the plays he was running last preseason...freeing up TG to strech the outside and force 1 on 1 coverage for the WR on that side (or actually force 1 on 1 coverage of TG)...to bad we don't have the diagram a play anymore

View Poll Results: Should we focus on the O as well?
Yes. Those stalls are worrisome.	18	62.07%
No. The D stunk so badly they need all the attention.	9	31.03%
Bite me, Gaz...my Ho is none of yo' business.	2	6.90%
Voters: 29. You may not vote on this poll

03-25-2005, 01:56 PM
Gaz Defense Homer Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Rancho Gaz Casino cash: $10010793	What about the O? We all know our Defense stunk in 2004, but it should not overshadow the fact that our Offense stalled at critical moments in several games. So, it is Defense, Defense, Defense or do the Offense Homers get a seat at the banquet, too? xoxo~ Gaz Thowing the OHo’s a bone.
Posts: 5,911

03-25-2005, 03:09 PM	#33
Coogs In Search of a Life Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Northern Kansas Casino cash: $1044349	And to answer Gaz's original question, If CB is adressed by the time of the draft, or if it looks like Law is going to be added after the draft, then the drat should be wide open. Remember, we still have draft picks from last year who could/should factor into the improvement of the defense as well.
Posts: 21,674