Under what circumstances would you accept a WR being drafted in the 1st round? - Page 3

Chiefs Pantalones · 04-09-2005, 09:11 PM

Would you be fine if we drafted one as it is right now?

Would we have to get another OLB in FA first, as well as Surtain?

**Bowser** · 04-10-2005, 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz

FA:
Surtain
Sharper

Draft:
1st-Rogers
2nd - Roth

would be pretty the way i hope it goes

I'll do a drunken craazy-happy dance if that happens! And I have less rhythm than your average white boy.....

whoman69 · 04-10-2005, 10:32 AM

I can think of no scenario where we should draft WR. At some point DV has to trust that his younger players can get the job done. If he didn't think they could, why did he draft them in the first place? Why not just trade all your draft picks like George Allen used to do?

Mr. Laz · 04-10-2005, 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser

I'll do a drunken craazy-happy dance if that happens! And I have less rhythm than your average white boy.....

then i can expect your support when i announce my candidacy for Chiefs' GM in 2009, when the king retires?

htismaqe · 04-10-2005, 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz

FA:
Surtain
Sharper

Draft:
1st-Rogers
2nd - Roth

would be pretty the way i hope it goes

Oh fuck, if that happened, I'd probably die of a heart-attack.

That would definitely make this the best offseason ever...

04-10-2005, 12:01 PM

I don't know if we take a corner in the first if we sign one from free agency.

I bet LB or D - end.

Hydrae · 04-10-2005, 12:04 PM

Only if his name is Mike Williams (there is no way Edwards will still be on the board at 15). Even then, I would hesitate if we haven't gotten either Law or Surtain. I think Williams will be a stud WR for many years in this league.

CoMoChief · 04-10-2005, 12:06 PM

We would need to sign an OLB and trade for Surtain and then we sign Matt Jones (Arkansas) with our first round pick.

CoMoChief · 04-10-2005, 12:06 PM

im sorry, I meant DRAFT Matt Jones

Eleazar · 04-10-2005, 12:08 PM

It all depends on the situation when we come on the clock, who's there and who's gone. If we have Surtain, if Rolle/Jones/Rogers/Johnson are all gone, there really aren't any other defenders tnat would piss me off to miss if Mike Williams was still on the board, or something crazy like that.

CoMoChief · 04-10-2005, 12:16 PM

Ty Law is not a good decision. If we sign him I will actually be pissed. I dont know why people are FOR signing him. Hes good dont get me wrong, but he wont recover from injury 100%, history will tell you that. Surtain has better numbers and is a work horse. We need to sign a OLB, Surtain, and then if we dont trade up for DJ we need to draft Matt Jones.

Archie Bunker · 04-10-2005, 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BSPimpDude

Ty Law is not a good decision. If we sign him I will actually be pissed. I dont know why people are FOR signing him. Hes good dont get me wrong, but he wont recover from injury 100%, history will tell you that. Surtain has better numbers and is a work horse. We need to sign a OLB, Surtain, and then if we dont trade up for DJ we need to draft Matt Jones.

I think Law will recover and if he does he is the best CB in the league. I want Surtain right now since the Chiefs can't afford to gamble but if Law was healthy it would be a no brainer to get him IMO.

Matt Jones is the last thing the Chiefs need. He is one of the players that will cause me to throw a shit fit if the Chiefs draft him.

Not a true receiver
Not a QB
Not a H-Back

He could be a fun toy for Saunders but little else.

TRR · 04-10-2005, 12:30 PM

If we get Surtain, I woudn't mind a WR in the first round. However, I would rather have Kevin Johnson, and draft an OLB or DE in the first. Mike Williams is the only possible WR that interests me in the 1st round.

Gaz · 04-10-2005, 12:33 PM

I agree on Law. Avoid him.

I have to disagree on Jones. While I think Defense should be the #1 priority of every Chiefs fan, I can sympathize with the OffHo’s who want a WR. Under a specific set of circumstances, I could even accept that. But under those specific circumstances, I want a real WR. Not another jack of all trades who put up impressive numbers at a workout.

xoxo~
Gaz
Willing to compromise, but only up to a point.

Mr. Laz · 04-10-2005, 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BSPimpDude

We would need to sign an OLB and trade for Surtain and then we sign Matt Jones (Arkansas) with our first round pick.

hell no ... we will NOT use are first round draft pick on Matt Jones!!!

**HemiEd** · 04-10-2005, 01:03 PM

I actually do hope we draft one first because I think that is the only position that we can expect a Rookie to come in and help the 2005 push.
We will have Surtain, the rest of the draft can be used on Defense.

04-09-2005, 09:11 PM
Chiefs Pantalones GO CHIEFS!!!!!! Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Kansas City Casino cash: $7888717	Under what circumstances would you accept a WR being drafted in the 1st round? Would you be fine if we drafted one as it is right now? Would we have to get another OLB in FA first, as well as Surtain?
Posts: 26,630

04-10-2005, 12:01 PM	#35
Ninjaman Guest Casino cash: $	I don't know if we take a corner in the first if we sign one from free agency. I bet LB or D - end.
Posts: n/a

04-10-2005, 12:04 PM	#36
Hydrae Sandbox: Leander Lasercats Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Austin, Tx Casino cash: $1867000	Only if his name is Mike Williams (there is no way Edwards will still be on the board at 15). Even then, I would hesitate if we haven't gotten either Law or Surtain. I think Williams will be a stud WR for many years in this league.
Posts: 14,706

04-10-2005, 12:06 PM	#37
CoMoChief Mahomes Dynasty Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Parts Unknown Casino cash: $7972254	We would need to sign an OLB and trade for Surtain and then we sign Matt Jones (Arkansas) with our first round pick. __________________
Posts: 39,174

04-10-2005, 12:06 PM	#38
CoMoChief Mahomes Dynasty Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Parts Unknown Casino cash: $7972254	im sorry, I meant DRAFT Matt Jones __________________
Posts: 39,174

04-10-2005, 12:08 PM	#39
Eleazar Beyond the Rapids Join Date: May 2003 Location: Langley, VA Casino cash: $-370000	It all depends on the situation when we come on the clock, who's there and who's gone. If we have Surtain, if Rolle/Jones/Rogers/Johnson are all gone, there really aren't any other defenders tnat would piss me off to miss if Mike Williams was still on the board, or something crazy like that.
Posts: 80,659

04-10-2005, 12:16 PM	#40
CoMoChief Mahomes Dynasty Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Parts Unknown Casino cash: $7972254	Ty Law is not a good decision. If we sign him I will actually be pissed. I dont know why people are FOR signing him. Hes good dont get me wrong, but he wont recover from injury 100%, history will tell you that. Surtain has better numbers and is a work horse. We need to sign a OLB, Surtain, and then if we dont trade up for DJ we need to draft Matt Jones. __________________
Posts: 39,174

04-10-2005, 12:30 PM	#42
TRR The Priest and I Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: CO Casino cash: $9870185	If we get Surtain, I woudn't mind a WR in the first round. However, I would rather have Kevin Johnson, and draft an OLB or DE in the first. Mike Williams is the only possible WR that interests me in the 1st round.
Posts: 7,262

04-10-2005, 12:33 PM	#43
Gaz Defense Homer Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Rancho Gaz Casino cash: $10010793	I think not... I agree on Law. Avoid him. I have to disagree on Jones. While I think Defense should be the #1 priority of every Chiefs fan, I can sympathize with the OffHo’s who want a WR. Under a specific set of circumstances, I could even accept that. But under those specific circumstances, I want a real WR. Not another jack of all trades who put up impressive numbers at a workout. xoxo~ Gaz Willing to compromise, but only up to a point.
Posts: 5,911

04-10-2005, 01:03 PM	#45
HemiEd Supporter Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Ozarks Casino cash: $2720564	I actually do hope we draft one first because I think that is the only position that we can expect a Rookie to come in and help the 2005 push. We will have Surtain, the rest of the draft can be used on Defense.
Posts: 33,662