Leonard Davis Available - Page 3

Chiefaholic · 10-15-2006, 11:50 AM

Cardinals | L. Davis on the trade block
Sun, 15 Oct 2006 10:17:42 -0700

Jay Glazer, of FOXSports.com, reports Arizona Cardinals OT Leonard Davis is available at the trade deadline. Davis has fallen out of favor with head coach Dennis Green and the team is reportedly asking for "a pick or a player," according to an NFC general manager. The general manager added it appears the team would like to trade him "for pretty much anything, they seemed like they were just trying to unload him."

**The Bad Guy** · 10-15-2006, 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie

NO!!.... We should KEEP Fox.

Let me understand this for a minute.

If we could get a decent, young WR and a LT, we should do it so we can keep a backup LB?

Coach · 10-15-2006, 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy

Let me understand this for a minute.

If we could get a decent, young WR and a LT, we should do it so we can keep a backup LB?

Well, Fox is better than Bell, yet for some reason, the coaches keep Bell in the game.

I feel that Fox is suited for the Cover 2 scheme than Bell. And Fox is one of our consistent special team player as well.

I'd like to see if the Chiefs can get the young WR and LT w/o losing our young LB.

**DaneMcCloud** · 10-15-2006, 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach

Well, Fox is better than Bell, yet for some reason, the coaches keep Bell in the game.

I feel that Fox is suited for the Cover 2 scheme than Bell. And Fox is one of our consistent special team player as well.

So you're which coach on the Chiefs staff? Could it be that the reason that Fox hasn't been on the field is because Bell is better? Why don't you take it up with Herm, genius?

TrickyNicky · 10-15-2006, 01:20 PM

Solid logic. Join the Chiefs staff and argue with the head coach before you give an opinion...

PastorMikH · 10-15-2006, 01:28 PM

I'd be for trading a second day pick or a 3rd string player for him.

Not sure I want to give up much. The guy has huge upside potential that isn't being tapped into. (Sounds a lot like Sims IMO).

CupidStunt · 10-15-2006, 01:32 PM

Bryant Johnson?

Don't we have enough mediocre, #3 type receivers?

**Tribal Warfare** · 10-15-2006, 01:41 PM

I'd definitely would take a flyer on Davis. KC needs a replacement for Shields when he's gone. That's if they want to keep Welbourne at RT

RINGLEADER · 10-15-2006, 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie

"The second-overall pick in the 2001 draft behind Michael Vick."

Wow!! I'd say make an offer. Come on Carl.

Why does his draft position have anything to do with anything? I mean Sims was the sixth overall pick and he can't crack the starting lineup when two journeymen were the only ones standing in his way.

That said, he has to be an upgrade and it's a position where we need some depth. Wouldn't count on much from him this year though.

milkman · 10-15-2006, 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie

We don't have a 4th this year either? Who did we piss it away on?

Michael Bennett.

**Easy 6** · 10-15-2006, 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

Michael Bennett.

Aaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrggggggggghhhhhhhh......binnitt

milkman · 10-15-2006, 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

So you're which coach on the Chiefs staff? Could it be that the reason that Fox hasn't been on the field is because Bell is better? Why don't you take it up with Herm, genius?

Bell is on the field because of Gunt's stubborn pride.

That is the only reason.

Bell has made ONE ****ing play in 20 games.

He's ****ing useless.

I would love to tell Gunt what a useless ****ing piece of shit Bell is.

Edit:I'd also love to tell Gunt that he's a dumbass muther****er that needs his ass kicked for allowing his stubborn pride to get in the way of making decisions that benefit the team.

**DaneMcCloud** · 10-15-2006, 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrickyNicky

Solid logic. Join the Chiefs staff and argue with the head coach before you give an opinion...

What has Fox EVER shown? Why would someone automatically think that Fox is better, given his injury history and his lack of playing time? That makes no sense.

**DaneMcCloud** · 10-15-2006, 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

Bell is on the field because of Gunt's stubborn pride.

That is the only reason.

Bell has made ONE ****ing play in 20 games.

He's ****ing useless.

I would love to tell Gunt what a useless ****ing piece of shit Bell is.

Edit:I'd also love to tell Gunt that he's a dumbass muther****er that needs his ass kicked for allowing his stubborn pride to get in the way of making decisions that benefit the team.

Why don't you? Why don't you call into Edward's radio show and tell them how stupid they are for not playing Fox over Bell. I'm sure they'd appreciate your insight.

This Chiefs defense is playing better right now than in any season since 1997. How fans can think they know what's best for the defense compared to THIS particular defensive coaching staff is beyone me.

**Fire Me Boy!** · 10-17-2006, 08:59 AM

Jack Harry reported last night the Chiefs are trying to work out a trade for Davis. FWIW

PastorMikH · 10-17-2006, 09:05 AM

At 6-6 360 pounds, he will at least put a mass out there to run around and he WON'T get bull-rushed like Turley.

I'm interested.

10-15-2006, 11:50 AM
Chiefaholic Veteran Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $2841169	Leonard Davis Available Cardinals \| L. Davis on the trade block Sun, 15 Oct 2006 10:17:42 -0700 Jay Glazer, of FOXSports.com, reports Arizona Cardinals OT Leonard Davis is available at the trade deadline. Davis has fallen out of favor with head coach Dennis Green and the team is reportedly asking for "a pick or a player," according to an NFC general manager. The general manager added it appears the team would like to trade him "for pretty much anything, they seemed like they were just trying to unload him."
Posts: 4,646

10-15-2006, 01:20 PM	#34
TrickyNicky My Black Friend, Alan Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Manhattan Casino cash: $10007047	Solid logic. Join the Chiefs staff and argue with the head coach before you give an opinion...
Posts: 3,648

10-15-2006, 01:28 PM	#35
PastorMikH Will KC ever be better? Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Land of Red Dirt & Necks Casino cash: $9925087	I'd be for trading a second day pick or a 3rd string player for him. Not sure I want to give up much. The guy has huge upside potential that isn't being tapped into. (Sounds a lot like Sims IMO). __________________
Posts: 20,454

10-15-2006, 01:32 PM	#36
CupidStunt offense > defense Join Date: Jul 2005 Casino cash: $2083332	Bryant Johnson? Don't we have enough mediocre, #3 type receivers?
Posts: 8,924

10-15-2006, 01:41 PM	#37
Tribal Warfare The Boom Boom Room Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Far Beyond Comprehension Casino cash: $392813	I'd definitely would take a flyer on Davis. KC needs a replacement for Shields when he's gone. That's if they want to keep Welbourne at RT __________________
Posts: 42,204

10-17-2006, 08:59 AM	#44
Fire Me Boy! Cast Iron Jedi Join Date: Nov 2004 Casino cash: $9999900 VARSITY	Jack Harry reported last night the Chiefs are trying to work out a trade for Davis. FWIW
Posts: 35,253

10-17-2006, 09:05 AM	#45
PastorMikH Will KC ever be better? Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Land of Red Dirt & Necks Casino cash: $9925087	At 6-6 360 pounds, he will at least put a mass out there to run around and he WON'T get bull-rushed like Turley. I'm interested. __________________
Posts: 20,454