For the Morons that were in favor of starting Thigpen just because he's young...... - Page 3

CoMoChief · 09-28-2008, 03:15 PM

Please kindly

I'm fine with putting Croyle back in once he's healthy because thats why we drafted him......but the Thigpen experiment was probably the dumbest thing anyone has done in the NFL so far this season.

Had Huard started in ATL.....we could be 2-2.

chiefs1111 · 09-28-2008, 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

He and Croyle are like twins....

True,though at least Losman can run some

triple · 09-28-2008, 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can

true fans want to "win now!"

understand, this is all they care about

the long term strategy and risk of building a championship team mean nothing to them, because they don't want risk...they want to "win now!"

this is the fundamental true fan psychology that must be understood...they would gladly trade next year's #1 QB in the draft for 6 wins this year with Huard...

the fact that Huard will never take us anywhere is irrelevant to them....they don't think long term, and they like the safety of familiar mediocrity - Huard - versus the risk of the unknown - next year's #1 QB in the draft...

I'm not joking. This is real. This explains Carl Peterson's security, and our consistently mediocre franchise afraid to risk grooming, or even sucking enough to acquire, a first round QBOTF.

I hate True Fans. These MORONS are why our franchise sucks ass.l

i dont see what the 'risk' is, as a fan.

sometimes the chiefs win. sometimes they lose. when it's over, either way i end up outside mowing the lawn.

KC_Connection · 09-28-2008, 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can

true fans want to "win now!"

understand, this is all they care about

the long term strategy and risk of building a championship team mean nothing to them, because they don't want risk...they want to "win now!"

this is the fundamental true fan psychology that must be understood...they would gladly trade next year's #1 QB in the draft for 6 wins this year with Huard...

the fact that Huard will never take us anywhere is irrelevant to them....they don't think long term, and they like the safety of familiar mediocrity - Huard - versus the risk of the unknown - next year's #1 QB in the draft...

I'm not joking. This is real. This explains Carl Peterson's security, and our consistently mediocre franchise afraid to risk grooming, or even sucking enough to acquire, a first round QBOTF.

I hate True Fans. These MORONS are why our franchise sucks ass.l

Wow, I seriously have to ask. Are you completely ****ed in the head? Nobody is saing any of that.

**Rain Man** · 09-28-2008, 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can

see post #27

In that case, you should advocate for kneeling down on every offensive play. The lineman could practice their blocking and the receivers could run their routes, and you'd get more training time for the defense.

Do you not think it's better for Bowe to be catching passes, as opposed to watching passes hit the ground four yards away? I'd rather develop Bowe than develop Thigpen.

And I should stress that I have nothing against Thigpen. If he's our best option, we should let him play and I'll root for him. But I don't think we should sacrifice the development of Bowe specifically to give him playing time.

**Rain Man** · 09-28-2008, 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by triple

i dont think anyone says Thigpen should be starting now. I don't either. The depth chart should be croyle, huard, thigpen.

but it was not wrong to give him 1 game to see what he could do.

If he earned it by outperforming Huard in practice, I completely agree. But only if that happened.

ClevelandBronco · 09-28-2008, 04:31 PM

Why would Mormons want to start Thigpen just because he's young?

I mean, sure. Steve Young was a talented quarterback who went to BYU, but that doesn't mean that being just young is the same as being Steve Young. Young had an incredibly productive career, but it seems to me that this is a wild reach that...

Yes?

Oh. Morons, not Mormons?

Never mind.

BigRock · 09-28-2008, 04:33 PM

PUKE. I'll give Huard a big pat on the back for the win and everything, and he made a few good throws. But I can go the rest of my life without seeing the "deep pass 3 yards out of bounds" and the "-2 yard dumpoff into the flat" that are the trademarks of the Huard arsenal.

TEX · 09-28-2008, 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection

Don't start that pussy Croyle, either. He has just as much of a future here as Thigpen does.

Huard, in addition to providing this team with their best chance to win, also gives everybody else a chance to actually improve. It's always been that way, you ****tards.

Yep.

tk13 · 09-28-2008, 04:38 PM

Well, we already turned the roster over. It's not like last year... we have young guys all over the field. At some point some of these guys have to learn how to actually win football games. Or what's the point of even rebuilding. We should just kneel on the ball everytime so we can get 10-11 more rookies next year apparently. And just keep rebuilding until we find a QB, screw the rest of the roster.

We've turned the corner on putting young guys on this roster... now we need to develop some of them, and then start filling in the holes... QB, MLB, RT... and bring them onto a team that's making progress. You don't just start throwing donkey feces up against a wall until you get a QB then say "Oh well, now we can start adding other players." That makes less sense than the "true fans" who want to win 9 games.

KC_Connection · 09-28-2008, 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man

In that case, you should advocate for kneeling down on every offensive play. The lineman could practice their blocking and the receivers could run their routes, and you'd get more training time for the defense.

Do you not think it's better for Bowe to be catching passes, as opposed to watching passes hit the ground four yards away? I'd rather develop Bowe than develop Thigpen.

And I should stress that I have nothing against Thigpen. If he's our best option, we should let him play and I'll root for him. But I don't think we should sacrifice the development of Bowe specifically to give him playing time.

Finally some logic. Not a surprise that it comes from one of the best posters on this board.

damaticous · 09-28-2008, 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz

Thigpen has no business playing again in this league

I'm sorry, I probably shouldn't be speaking up...but come the **** on!!!!

The coaches failed the kid. He was setup for failure from the beginning.

How many running backs (short passes) did Huard complete today???

grow the F up and

.

Thigpen has a future in the NFL just not with a shitty coaching staff that the Chiefs have. They set him up to fail.

Pablo · 09-28-2008, 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by damaticous

I'm sorry, I probably shouldn't be speaking up...but come the **** on!!!!

The coaches failed the kid. He was setup for failure from the beginning.

How many running backs (short passes) did Huard complete today???

grow the F up and

.

Thigpen has a future in the NFL just not with a shitty coaching staff that the Chiefs have. They set him up to fail.

No he doesn't.

He's a 7th round practice squad scrub and he's the 3rd worst QB on the team with the worst QB situation in the NFL. He has no future, and he was lucky to get one entire game to showcase his lack of talent, poise in the pocket, and intelligence.

You don't have to give a guy time to develop and mature if you didn't draft him, and you didn't pay big money to acquire him off of a practice squad.

Thigpen was a week long band-aid that failed miserably.

CoMoChief · 09-28-2008, 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by damaticous

I'm sorry, I probably shouldn't be speaking up...but come the **** on!!!!

The coaches failed the kid. He was setup for failure from the beginning.

How many running backs (short passes) did Huard complete today???

grow the F up and

.

Thigpen has a future in the NFL just not with a shitty coaching staff that the Chiefs have. They set him up to fail.

Is that why we picked him up off of waivers or..............?

**Rain Man** · 09-28-2008, 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection

Finally some logic. Not a surprise that it comes from one of the best posters on this board.

I like you.

**the Talking Can** · 10-05-2008, 12:57 PM

Great thread

Huard
4-11
33 yards
2 turnovers

Chiefs ass pounded 24-0

True Fans win again.

09-28-2008, 03:15 PM
CoMoChief Mahomes Dynasty Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Parts Unknown Casino cash: $8022254	For the Morons that were in favor of starting Thigpen just because he's young...... Please kindly I'm fine with putting Croyle back in once he's healthy because thats why we drafted him......but the Thigpen experiment was probably the dumbest thing anyone has done in the NFL so far this season. Had Huard started in ATL.....we could be 2-2.
Posts: 39,165

09-28-2008, 04:31 PM	#36
ClevelandBronco I'm with the banned. Join Date: Sep 2006 Casino cash: $5658955	Why would Mormons want to start Thigpen just because he's young? I mean, sure. Steve Young was a talented quarterback who went to BYU, but that doesn't mean that being just young is the same as being Steve Young. Young had an incredibly productive career, but it seems to me that this is a wild reach that... Yes? Oh. Morons, not Mormons? Never mind.
Posts: 28,113

09-28-2008, 04:33 PM	#37
BigRock Pritay Pritay Pritay Good Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: The State of Euphoria Casino cash: $3145412	PUKE. I'll give Huard a big pat on the back for the win and everything, and he made a few good throws. But I can go the rest of my life without seeing the "deep pass 3 yards out of bounds" and the "-2 yard dumpoff into the flat" that are the trademarks of the Huard arsenal.
Posts: 6,841

09-28-2008, 04:38 PM	#39
tk13 ... Join Date: Nov 2001 Casino cash: $1682500	Well, we already turned the roster over. It's not like last year... we have young guys all over the field. At some point some of these guys have to learn how to actually win football games. Or what's the point of even rebuilding. We should just kneel on the ball everytime so we can get 10-11 more rookies next year apparently. And just keep rebuilding until we find a QB, screw the rest of the roster. We've turned the corner on putting young guys on this roster... now we need to develop some of them, and then start filling in the holes... QB, MLB, RT... and bring them onto a team that's making progress. You don't just start throwing donkey feces up against a wall until you get a QB then say "Oh well, now we can start adding other players." That makes less sense than the "true fans" who want to win 9 games.
Posts: 55,003

10-05-2008, 12:57 PM	#45
the Talking Can Supporter Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: street Casino cash: $10022208	Great thread Huard 4-11 33 yards 2 turnovers Chiefs ass pounded 24-0 True Fans win again. __________________ Clark Hunt: "Thank god for the Dominican pool boy"
Posts: 51,585