Mizzou Basketball - Page 311

**Saul Good** · 09:06 PM

MIZ-ZOU

DJ's left nut · 03-11-2012, 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection

It's either some KU-led national conspiracy to keep MU out of a #1 seed (despite their lesser schedule, lack of big wins, and two-game loss in the conference) or it's what I'm saying. I guess you guys will believe what you want, but which is more likely?

What's more likely is that the same stodgy old voters that keep putting overrated B1G teams in positions to embarrass themselves annually will do so again.

It's not a conspiracy against Mizzou; it's just the same ol' B1G ball-licking that we always see.

KC_Connection · 03-11-2012, 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zoccer|

I don't care what seed they get. I am just concerned that you don't understand the basic words you type and what they mean.

You might want to try to grasp the concept of a weak schedule before saying shit like this.

|Zach| · 03-11-2012, 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection

You might want to try to grasp the concept of a weak schedule before saying shit like this.

You might want to learn what the word "no" means. Before you try to qualify something that just before you said didn't exist.

If you need help understanding basic language concepts maybe kcnut can have a sit down with you or something?

I have no Jawhawk clothes.

o rly?

None that I wear outside at least.

lol

KC_Connection · 03-11-2012, 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zoccer|

You might want to learn what the word "no" means. Before you try to qualify something that just before you said didn't exist.

If you need help understanding basic language concepts maybe kcnut can have a sit down with you or something?

I have no Jawhawk clothes.

o rly?

None that I wear outside at least.

lol

Amazing to see the level of butthurt with you, it truly is.

|Zach| · 03-11-2012, 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection

Amazing to see the level of butthurt with you, it truly is.

Is there? I am just ready for basketball. I don't think there is a conspiracy. I say match up us up with another team and put the ball on the court.

I am just reading your posts...surely you realize how reeruned you are coming off?

If you want to explain yourself differently though feel free to use words that express that.

KC_Connection · 03-11-2012, 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zoccer|

Is there? I am just ready for basketball. I don't think there is a conspiracy. I say match up us up with another team and put the ball on the court.

I am just reading your posts...surely you realize how reeruned you are coming off?

If you want to explain yourself differently though feel free to use words that express that.

There's only so many ways that I can say that MU didn't have the elite wins or strong schedule to get a #1 over the B10 teams, ACC teams, or KU. If you can't see that, it's simply because you don't want to.

|Zach| · 03-11-2012, 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection

There's only so many ways that I can say that MU didn't have the elite wins or strong schedule to get a #1 over the B10 teams, ACC teams, or KU. If you can't see that, it's simply because you don't want to.

You said we didn't have any big wins.

Those were your words. If you meant something else that is fine. Use those words instead.

But what do I know...you are the guy with well over 200 posts in a Mizzou thread so I guess I am the one who is butthurt.

I don't feel the need to prove anything to rival fans in their thread but you just can't quit us can you.

DJ's left nut · 03-11-2012, 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection

There's only so many ways that I can say that MU didn't have the elite wins or strong schedule to get a #1 over the B10 teams, ACC teams, or KU. If you can't see that, it's simply because you don't want to.

Remember guys - losing to good teams means you had a better year.

Where's KU's big win, hotshot? You're not really going to try to bark up that OSU tree are you? Beating OSU without Sullinger is no more impressive than beating Cal.

Keep on crowin', beaker. You really are talking out your ass.

|Zach| · 03-11-2012, 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut

Remember guys - losing to good teams means you had a better year.

Where's KU's big win, hotshot? You're not really going to try to bark up that OSU tree are you? Beating OSU without Sullinger is no more impressive than beating Cal.

Keep on crowin', beaker. You really are talking out your ass.

Missouri doesn't have big wins. - KCC

KC_Connection · 03-11-2012, 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut

Remember guys - losing to good teams means you had a better year.

Where's KU's big win, hotshot? You're not really going to try to bark up that OSU tree are you? Beating OSU without Sullinger is no more impressive than beating Cal.

Keep on crowin', beaker. You really are talking out your ass.

KU's wins over OSU and Georgetown elevate them over MU in the eyes of the committee, yes.

|Zach| · 03-11-2012, 11:25 AM

Probably time for 100 more posts in a Missouri thread telling us how butthurt we are.

lol

Braincase · 03-11-2012, 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PostRockPablo

Can't agree with that. They have big wins, just not in non-con.

I think the point (valid or otherwise) was that in the non-con, Mizzou didn't play a large number of teams headed for the dance.

Is it true that Mizzou only had one game against a team headed for the NCAA tournament in the non-con? If that is the case, like it or not, it's going to hurt.

KC_Connection · 03-11-2012, 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zoccer|

You said we didn't have any big wins.

Those were your words. If you meant something else that is fine. Use those words instead.

But what do I know...you are the guy with well over 200 posts in a Mizzou thread so I guess I am the one who is butthurt.

I don't feel the need to prove anything to rival fans in their thread but you just can't quit us can you.

It's called hyperbole for effect. I've said many times now that it's because MU didn't have enough big wins in comparison with the others, not that they had absolutely none.

stonedstooge · 03-11-2012, 11:27 AM

Is the Kansas loss to Baylor a good loss or a bad one?

DJ's left nut · 03-11-2012, 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection

KU's wins over OSU and Georgetown elevate them over MU in the eyes of the committee, yes.

So yeah - you're going with the OSU win. Got it. Maybe you're right and the committee voters will be as blind to names (i.e. 'B1G' and 'Ohio State') as you hope they are. If so, maybe you have a chance at that #1 afterall. BUt if they actually pay attention to the fact that KU beat an OSU squad that isn't a top 25 squad without Sullinger and lost to every other 'premier' team it played - you're probably out of luck.

And for the record, Mizzou's win over a healthy ND squad is every bit as impressive as KU's win over Georgetown, especially since we beat them by about 87 points, but that doesn't fit your horseshit narrative nearly as well.

Beakers, man...

02-02-2012, 07:18 PM
Saul Good Quit your bullshit Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Bored of winning Casino cash: $10052799	Mizzou Basketball MIZ-ZOU Last edited by Saul Good; 03-11-2012 at 09:06 PM..
Posts: 41,870

03-11-2012, 11:25 AM	#4661
\|Zach\| For The Glory Of The City Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Kansas City Casino cash: $3186768	Probably time for 100 more posts in a Missouri thread telling us how butthurt we are. lol
Posts: 54,688

03-11-2012, 11:27 AM	#4664
stonedstooge Arf! Arf! Arf! Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: North Casino cash: $3894173	Is the Kansas loss to Baylor a good loss or a bad one? __________________ 2013 ADOPT A CHIEF Eric Kush "Often is a word I seldom use"--JP
Posts: 25,289