Chiefs Chiefs are looking for a 2nd and a pick in 2014 for Albert - Page 37

ShowtimeSBMVP · 03-22-2013, 09:26 AM

Chiefs are seeking a second-round pick in this year's draft as well as another pick in 2014 in a trade for franchise OT Branden Albert.
— Adam Schefter (@AdamSchefter) March 22, 2013

O.city · 03-22-2013, 06:32 PM

All the teams that want the trade up have skull ****ed is on the field recently so I'm not sure who's the loser franchise

B14ckmon · 03-22-2013, 06:33 PM

Jaguars should trade for him and force his dumb backwoods ass to play RT until he quits because the suns too hot.

Beeker · 03-22-2013, 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence

****ing bullshit speculation.

How is it any different than the speculation about Geno Smith??

ShowtimeSBMVP · 03-22-2013, 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YayMike

Without reading through all these pages of bullshit, have we heard anything about Albert's thoughts on a contract? or any team being interested? or of this being a smoke screen? or is this just another thread of bitching, whining and complaining?

I think it's all a smoke screen.

jd1020 · 03-22-2013, 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beeker

How is it any different than the speculation about Geno Smith??

Probably because if Geno busts he's no different than any other QB we've had in the last 6 years, making him equal.

Albert is one of the best LT's in the game...

RunKC · 03-22-2013, 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city

They're mad cause we are apperantly trading a good young player for monetary reasons and creating an unnecessary hole to be filled with a pick we could use to upgrade another are like a pass rusher

Let me ask you something O.city.

Wouldn't it make sense that they know something about Albert that we don't? Whether it's his attitude or his his health or whatever?

Or maybe it's the fact that:

1. The best prospects in this draft this year are the 3 LT's.
2. There is NO depth for LT in this draft after those 3.
3. They want an elite caliber LT for 10 years instead of a LT that is about to be 30 and can't stay healthy for a full season.

O.city · 03-22-2013, 06:37 PM

If the want to put the best ol out there this year, they'd keep Albert and draft one of te top guys to play rt.

It would be value questionable taking a rt that early but money wise it would be fine

**YayMike** · 03-22-2013, 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan

I think it's all a smoke screen.

I tend to agree...perhaps to get Albert's demands down a bit? Or moreso to leverage people to trade up for the #1?

Either way...the only questionable move in my opinion this regime has made has been Alex Smith, so i'm curious to see how this plays out over the next month or so.

'Hamas' Jenkins · 03-22-2013, 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J Diddy

That 1.1 pick was worthless the second we got it. I remember taking a ton of shit for it at the time, but I pointed out that with no clear cut stand out they're going to go conservative for the safe side. That it was idiotic for us to cheer losing, because in the end it would most likely cost us what everyone wanted in the first place and that was a quarterback.

In a forum full of idiotic posts, that is one of the most illogical and idiotic I've ever read.

It's ok to draft a QB with the 8th pick in a draft with middling top tier talent, but not at 1.1.

With a rookie wage scale in place, what's the ****ing difference? Five million bucks?

jd1020 · 03-22-2013, 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC

Let me ask you something O.city.

Wouldn't it make sense that they know something about Albert that we don't? Whether it's his attitude or his his health or whatever?

Or maybe it's the fact that:

1. The best prospects in this draft this year are the 3 LT's.
2. There is NO depth for LT in this draft after those 3.
3. They want an elite caliber LT for 10 years instead of a LT that is about to be 30 and can't stay healthy for a full season.

I doubt they care about their players being healthy for a full season considering they just traded for a soon to be 29 year old, 8 year vet, that's only completed 2 full seasons.

**YayMike** · 03-22-2013, 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city

If the want to put the best ol out there this year, they'd keep Albert and draft one of te top guys to play rt.

It would be value questionable taking a rt that early but money wise it would be fine

So whats the stop them from keeping albert on the franchise tag, trading down with whomever, drafting the best OT there, and seeing how the rest plays out.

**BigMeatballDave** · 03-22-2013, 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Go to Hell

Proof that there are lots of morons in the NFL.

Pot meet Kettle

'Hamas' Jenkins · 03-22-2013, 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan

"The guys that were in the combine last year, all of them when they left the room, you went, 'Wow,'" Arians said via ESPN.com's Mike Sando. "No one in this draft made me go, 'Wow.'"

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap100...gn=Twitter_atl

This is from a Head coach that is gonna start Drew Stanton at QB.

Which might point to the fact that he's a ****ing moron and his opinion is worthless. He's also using revisionist history, which is the favored logic of all risk-averse pussies.

Hammock Parties · 03-22-2013, 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave

Pot meet Kettle

Eat a dick, homer.

O.city · 03-22-2013, 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC

Let me ask you something O.city.

Wouldn't it make sense that they know something about Albert that we don't? Whether it's his attitude or his his health or whatever?

Or maybe it's the fact that:

1. The best prospects in this draft this year are the 3 LT's.
2. There is NO depth for LT in this draft after those 3.
3. They want an elite caliber LT for 10 years instead of a LT that is about to be 30 and can't stay healthy for a full season.

Bowe is almost 30 and has been injured the last two years, we paid him. If its injury they're worried about they probably shouldn't have franchised him.

So becaus the best prospects are LTs you wanna create a hole so you can draft one? That's treading water IMO especially when you already have a guy that's a good player coming off his rookie deal.

You also can look at next years draft where there are 3 potential LTs as good as te 3 in this draft. You yourself stated a few weeks ago how big of a let down it would be taking a lt at 1, now it's cool.

If he's injury prone, fine don't sign him. However if that's the problem I would have rather let him walk than potentially be paying an injured lt 10 mil this year

03-22-2013, 09:26 AM
ShowtimeSBMVP Chiefs Join Date: Feb 2009 Casino cash: $2726009	Chiefs are looking for a 2nd and a pick in 2014 for Albert Chiefs are seeking a second-round pick in this year's draft as well as another pick in 2014 in a trade for franchise OT Branden Albert. — Adam Schefter (@AdamSchefter) March 22, 2013
Posts: 23,773

03-22-2013, 06:32 PM	#541
O.city In Search of a Life Join Date: Jul 2009 Casino cash: $1564064	All the teams that want the trade up have skull ****ed is on the field recently so I'm not sure who's the loser franchise
Posts: 82,261

03-22-2013, 06:33 PM	#542
B14ckmon Jagwire Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Cedar Rapids, IA Casino cash: $10004900	Jaguars should trade for him and force his dumb backwoods ass to play RT until he quits because the suns too hot. __________________ Luke Joeckel - Chiefs LT of the Future!
Posts: 2,316

03-22-2013, 06:37 PM	#547
O.city In Search of a Life Join Date: Jul 2009 Casino cash: $1564064	If the want to put the best ol out there this year, they'd keep Albert and draft one of te top guys to play rt. It would be value questionable taking a rt that early but money wise it would be fine
Posts: 82,261