|
03-14-2008, 02:18 PM | #46 | |
v^V^v^V^v^V^
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Holland*
Casino cash: $10005177
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Posts: 39,518
|
03-14-2008, 02:27 PM | #47 | |
Banned!
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: NOT Columbia, MO 65201
Casino cash: $1770194
|
Quote:
__________________
Your son is a bench warmer because of your weak genetics not because of the coach Norlin Mommsen is disgusting. |
|
Posts: 46,724
|
03-14-2008, 04:52 PM | #48 |
Feelin' Alright
Join Date: Aug 2004
Casino cash: $10004900
|
It's not an uncommon line of though, which is why I tried to address it.
__________________
"Think about how stupid the average person is. Then remember that half the people in the world are stupider than that." --George Carlin |
Posts: 16,887
|
03-14-2008, 05:17 PM | #49 |
Pritay Pritay Pritay Good
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: The State of Euphoria
Casino cash: $2405412
|
From the title, I was hoping this was gonna be like a Ferris Bueller sequel or something.
|
Posts: 6,911
|
03-15-2008, 03:22 AM | #50 |
Apr 13,1949 – Dec 15, 2011
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Kansas City, MO
Casino cash: $9996085
|
The reason these people are being shunned isn't because they are believers, and it isn't because they are questioning Darwin's Theory. They are being shunned because they are involved with The Discovery Institute. Period. It's like wearing a swastika in Isreal.
|
Posts: 3,761
|
03-15-2008, 08:28 AM | #51 | |
The Master
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Marion, IA
Casino cash: $10004925
|
What people need to get over is the fact that Darwinism does not prove there is no God. They can go hand in hand. God could have used evolution to create everything. Like most issues in America the conversation needs to move more towards the center. Those who take too literal a view of the bible by trying to state that gravity is the hand of God keeping us connected to the earth are just as guilty as those who believe that science has disproven God.
I once asked my 8th grade science teacher if the study of science had made it more difficult to believe in a higher being. He stated that it actually reinforced his beliefs. While I don't believe that things like intelligent design should be taught in schools, there should at least be a disclaimer that Darwinism and the Big Bang Theory do not disprove the presence of a higher being. If you want to take that a step farther then teach those things at home and church. Schools are not the place to present a rigid religious doctrine.
__________________
-Watching Eddie Podolak Quote:
|
|
Posts: 23,101
|
03-15-2008, 09:10 AM | #52 | |
Space Cadet and Aczabel
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Kanab, UT, USA
Casino cash: $9333275
VARSITY
|
Quote:
A+ young padawan! Dave and Rep!
__________________
Thanks, Trump for the civics lesson. We are learning so much about RICO, espionage, sedition, impeachment, the 25th Amendment, order of succession, nepotism, separation of powers, 1st Amendment, obstruction of justice, the emoluments clause, conflicts of interest, collusion, sanctions, oligarchs, money laundering and so much more. |
|
Posts: 40,584
|
03-21-2008, 06:49 PM | #53 | ||
Feelin' Alright
Join Date: Aug 2004
Casino cash: $10004900
|
I have some information to pass along again:
Quote:
Follow up: Quote:
His story is backed up here.
__________________
"Think about how stupid the average person is. Then remember that half the people in the world are stupider than that." --George Carlin |
||
Posts: 16,887
|
03-21-2008, 09:10 PM | #54 |
Administrator
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Austin
Casino cash: $1385002
|
Everyone should be forced to go to Catholic school. (j/k)
I was taught RELIGION in religion class... and I mean religion as a concept.. not just Catholicism.. and I was taught EVOLUTION in science class... with NO DISCLAIMER... It seems to me that these people must just assume that their children are dirt stupid... if they want THEIR children exposed to both ideas... then shouldn't THEY do just that... or is it that they want ALL children exposed to their beliefs? Seems mighty heavy handed to me. F*** 'em... I will most likely send my children to Catholic school.. but I'll be damned if I try to force that on everyone elses kids. How many of these folks would be ok with adding a bit of the "science" of Dianetics to the classroom as well? Last edited by AustinChief; 03-21-2008 at 09:37 PM.. |
Posts: 19,788
|
03-21-2008, 10:16 PM | #55 |
BAMF!
Join Date: Nov 2007
Casino cash: $9549897
|
irishjayhawk
I had not reached your post yet, but I have compiled almost the exact same list of quotes to respond to. I applaud you. I would like to note a few things as well. I am a philosophy and religion major; No that is not one major, it is two separate majors. I already have my minor in psychology, and have one year left. I choose to study religion later in my academic career once this ID ridiculousness began to get a lot of press; roughly 1.5 years ago or something. Part of the problem with the whole ID conundrum is that scientists, philosophers, religion studies ... etc. do not want to even bother debating them. It just gives them more press, and seemingly more credibility if you take them on in public discourse... which inevitably leads nowhere (for reasons mentioned before: such as IDer wanting scientific method amended so it will allow their ideas). As for holes in evolution, wow, yes it does have holes. What is the problem with that? It is a continuing theory of science that attempts to understand the beginning of life possibly as far back as 3 billion years ago up to the present. That doesn't seem like a very easy task to tackle in a few generations. Another way to think about this is to ask: Are we are on Earth now? Not floating about in space, or above the Earth by any measure? Gravity, after all is just a theory, which has enormous holes in it. Yes we seem to understand gravity and the nature of it on Earth, but it still has holes in it on Earth (and massive unexplainable phenomena on the quantum and massive scales). To really throw the IDer's off, it never once is mentioned in the bible, not once. God did not see fit to create one (or any) of the most fundamental forces in nature in Genesis. God at least explained how animals got here; from earthen materials while trying to create a companion for Adam (interesting side note: in Hebrew (adam) actually means human and (eve) actually means life...slight mistranslation somewhere along the lines I suppose). America is also the only place this 'debate' is being forced to take place. Europe doesn't even think twice about it. Maybe that is because they are far better educated? I do not know. Okay, I have to go before finishing this, a friend is having some troubles. Please understand that I do not want to hurt anyones feelings, but I may do so with my attitude. I cannot help that I am dick.
__________________
Main Entry: bowe·ner Pronunciation: \ˈbō-nər\ Function: noun Date: circa 2007 |
Posts: 8,358
|
03-21-2008, 10:40 PM | #56 | |
Feelin' Alright
Join Date: Aug 2004
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Another little update:
1) Quote:
2) NY Times picked up on the issue. 3) Salon picked up as well. 4) SocraticGadFly has a summary of the lies Mark Mathis, Expelled's Producer, has to offer.
__________________
"Think about how stupid the average person is. Then remember that half the people in the world are stupider than that." --George Carlin |
|
Posts: 16,887
|
03-21-2008, 10:45 PM | #57 | |
v^V^v^V^v^V^
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Holland*
Casino cash: $10005177
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Posts: 39,518
|
03-22-2008, 12:39 AM | #58 | |
☻☺
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: ♠█♠
Casino cash: $10004900
|
and a bowener at that! lol
Quote:
politics/religion really sucks. i wish they'd both disappear. one thing i've learned from this thread that irish pointed out, is that evolution doesn't try to explain the origin of life. i don't think it even infers that humans evolved from apes, right? or that life started in one place rather than 20, for example? people just love to have conflict |
|
Posts: 2,362
|
03-22-2008, 01:22 AM | #59 | |
BAMF!
Join Date: Nov 2007
Casino cash: $9549897
|
Quote:
Physics never tries to prove anything beyond the Big Bang either. Why try? That is not in the realm of science (so far as we know). What they want to prove is why everything is how it is now through testable repeatable sets of data. Evolution is the same way, once life began, however it got started, it was most likely in the form of a single celled organism. If you are curious, all the necessary components for life exist in nature, and definately would have existed in 'the primordial ooze' of ancient Earth. Something just had to give it a 'spark'. Could have been radiation from the Sun since Earth would have had a weak ozone, could have been an organic mishap or mistake... but they are pretty close to being able to do this now: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7041353.stm also http://www.hno.harvard.edu/gazette/1...ngLifeina.html Fascinating stuff. But yeah, physics/biology, [science], does not have a preconceived notion of the world, [science] uncovers, through the data given, what the world really is. That is something everybody should keep in mind. X-ian creationists have a preset notion of the world, namely God created it, and they are setting out to try and prove that notion. This in turn means they discard data that does not fit. Science accepts the data that does not fit and tries to get it again, if it occurs again, then science needs to discover why it appeared and then include the new data. Int. Designers use the argument of 'irreducible complexity', which is actually a rehash of an older argument known as the 'watchmaker analogy'. They are interesting arguments, but flawed. A short response to Behe's Ir.Com. that I just read from a Christopher Hitchens book was, (that the 'miraculous designs' we see in the human eye that are so perfect and complex that they could not possibly come about from random chance or mutations prove that God/Designer exists) [keep in mind it is a response not refutation], if God designed us, then why give us horribly designed eyes? First off they see everything upside down, which the brain must correct, our rods and cones are not well balanced, and are easily damaged. We are born with a natural myopia of the eyes, and we have pretty weak ones at that; compared to the 'lesser' beings of the God designed world, especially birds. We can also trace the development of the eye through fossils and through living organisms today. Same can be said for the human brain. We are not well wired. We are still Apes (though many people seem to forget that we are) and our brain is not as highly evolved as we would like to think it is. Our lobes are too small and our adrenal glands are too big for our own good. We are just smart enough to understand how dumb this can cause (the majority) to be. I just thought that those were good questions/points. What I have learned of biology is that as an ape we share a link with the others. It doesnt mean we necessarily came directly from a chimp, but it means we shared a past ancestor with them (think of the letter Y as the branch with us on the right, chimps on the left and cousin 'It' at the bottom). Genetics has really allowed this argument to leap forward: here is a cool site for this http://www.cs.ucr.edu/~eamonn/DNA/ and another one: http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/238852_chimp01.html and: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1113180219.htm Now, Bed.
__________________
Main Entry: bowe·ner Pronunciation: \ˈbō-nər\ Function: noun Date: circa 2007 Last edited by bowener; 03-22-2008 at 01:27 AM.. Reason: bed |
|
Posts: 8,358
|
03-22-2008, 01:33 AM | #60 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Pittsburg
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Quote:
I haven't read much about the movie so I don't have any bias for or against it. I saw enough of the cuts from Moron Moores film to know that he manipulated truth to fit his agenda. I did not see his entire film although I had opportunity to do so. I also did not see the rebutal to the film and had plenty of opportunity to see that one as well. I'll probably not choose to watch this film either. My only commentary to date has to do with those that have agnostic and or atheistic beliefs seem to be flocking out against this movie just as the evangicals did against MM's film of incorrect or manipulated data. My only question regarding the film and those groups standing out against it: Why the fear? |
|
Posts: 2,691
|
|
|