I believe all you Huard haters have some crow to eat - Page 4

Hammock Parties · 09-17-2006, 05:17 PM

Told you he was a gamer!

OldTownChief · 09-17-2006, 06:53 PM

In essence, all the Huard backers are saying that he did what was ask of him. Pretty sad state of affairs when your just ask to hold onto the ball without driving your team downfield whatsoever. Sad state of affairs indeed.

burt · 09-17-2006, 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldTownChief

In essence, all the Huard backers are saying that he did what was ask of him. Pretty sad state of affairs when your just ask to hold onto the ball without driving your team downfield whatsoever. Sad state of affairs indeed.

So what would you have Huard do.......a Peyton Manning audible? He did what was asked of him....no one asked the right things.

Mosbonian · 09-17-2006, 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dale Mercer

Um, he did exactly what he was asked to, with the exception of catching his own pass and fumbling. Otherwise, he performed well(in my book)

Which is what he did..

Let's agree to disagree here...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dale Mercer

Huard ran the plays that were sent in from his coaches. He didn not call the plays. Seems to me that your beef os with Edwards and Solari..

Which is exactly what I have said in other threads.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dale Mercer

No, the Homers are all saying that this was pencilled in as a loss, so it doesn't matter. The Homers are all saying that we will come back and get in the hunt. We are just saying Huard isn't so very bad...and it is the coaches fault. Oh, yeah, BTW a real homer would NEVER say that.

Some of the Homers I have seen and heard said we could win this game...just hand the ball to LJ and wear out their Defense....

mmaddog
*******

09-17-2006, 07:01 PM

For months we've heard Huard haters say he needs to be cut and that he has no business in the NFL. Then he turns in a 9/10 first half and 17/23 overall performance and you guys are still trying to push that agenda. The Chiefs lost this game but they didn't lose because of anything Damon Huard did.

4th and Long · 09-17-2006, 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia

For months we've heard Huard haters say he needs to be cut and that he has no business in the NFL. Then he turns in a 9/10 first half and 17/23 overall performance and you guys are still trying to push that agenda. The Chiefs lost this game but they didn't lose because of anything Damon Huard did.

Man, ... I hate it when I have to agree with fat head.

Huard - Rating: 87.77
Plummer - Rating: 56.67

Hammock Parties · 09-17-2006, 07:03 PM

Exactly.

The Huard Haters were wrong. He does not suck. A year ago no one thought he was even capable of completing 50 percent of his passes.

burt · 09-17-2006, 07:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia

For months we've heard Huard haters say he needs to be cut and that he has no business in the NFL. Then he turns in a 9/10 first half and 17/23 overall performance and you guys are still trying to push that agenda. The Chiefs lost this game but they didn't lose because of anything Damon Huard did.

Which I politely ate crow. "You guys" is awful general.

Mosbonian · 09-17-2006, 07:08 PM

Being good vs. does not suck...hmmmm

I want a QB that is more than adequate.....

If he comes back 2 weeks from now and leads the team to victory with real stats, then come talk to me.

Yes...he played adequate....yes, he isn't the total reason we lost today. But to be satisfied that we scored 6 points on a team that was ripe for the plucking can't make you completely happy.

mmaddog
*******

**Rausch** · 09-17-2006, 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia

I'm not a homer nor am I a QB apologist. Huard did everything asked of him and then some. That's beyond adequate. He was on the money all afternoon. Any of you who think you could "manage" a game are clearly delusional.

I can't balance my checkbook, but his first duty is to avoid turnovers and not make stupid decisions.

He made a stupid decision that lead to a turnover, but he's not alone. LJ has fumbled in both our games.

You can't do $#it like that fighting upstream. I don't blame Huard for the game(It's the first action he's started since people wanted to **** Cleopatra) but I'm not going to say he played great either...

jspchief · 09-17-2006, 07:16 PM

Using his completion percentage as an argument for a game well played is the textbook example of stats not telling the entire story.

So Huard is clutch running an offense so scaled back that we can't win a game when we hold the opponent to 6 points. Great. That and a quarter will get you 25 cents.

A well-oiled machine that goes nowhere is still worthless, no matter how well-oiled it is.

If the Chiefs ever need someone to captain an ineffective offense, Damon Huard is their man. In the meantime, if they stil lwant to win games it's time to see if someone else is more capable of moving the ball.

09-17-2006, 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dale Mercer

Which I politely ate crow. "You guys" is awful general.

Huard haters is pretty specific. Clearly, you aren't in that classification.

ChiefsLV · 09-17-2006, 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs

Exactly.

The Huard Haters were wrong. He does not suck. A year ago no one thought he was even capable of completing 50 percent of his passes.

Huard's fumbles are killing us. The coaching staff has no confidence in him or we would have at least taken a couple shots downfield. All he did was manage the game and he still turned it over for a second straight game. He sucks, period. How you continue to post these rediculous opinions and not get neg. rep for them baffles me.

09-17-2006, 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mmaddog

Being good vs. does not suck...hmmmm

I want a QB that is more than adequate.....

If he comes back 2 weeks from now and leads the team to victory with real stats, then come talk to me.

Yes...he played adequate....yes, he isn't the total reason we lost today. But to be satisfied that we scored 6 points on a team that was ripe for the plucking can't make you completely happy.

mmaddog
*******

Those are "real stats". They're all real stats. Certainly, I'm not happy with the loss. I'm even less pleased with the way in which they lost. But they exceeded my expectations. I'm thrilled that they showed some defensive life. I'd rather focus on the positive.

09-17-2006, 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsLV

Huard's fumbles are killing us. The coaching staff has no confidence in him or we would have at least taken a couple shots downfield. All he did was manage the game and he still turned it over for a second straight game. He sucks, period. How you continue to post these rediculous opinions and not get neg. rep for them baffles me.

Neg rep for you.

**Rausch** · 09-17-2006, 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsLV

Huard's fumbles are killing us. The coaching staff has no confidence in him or we would have at least taken a couple shots downfield.

It's a catch 22, and it's not all about Huard.

If we do take shots downfield our tackles curl up in the fetal position and Huard get's his $3it rocked.

If we don't Herm is the antichrist...

09-17-2006, 05:17 PM
Hammock Parties I'll be back. Join Date: Nov 2002 Casino cash: $4430478	I believe all you Huard haters have some crow to eat Told you he was a gamer!
Posts: 278,674

09-17-2006, 06:53 PM	#46
OldTownChief Bobble Taco Join Date: May 2004 Casino cash: $10004900	In essence, all the Huard backers are saying that he did what was ask of him. Pretty sad state of affairs when your just ask to hold onto the ball without driving your team downfield whatsoever. Sad state of affairs indeed.
Posts: 5,362

09-17-2006, 07:01 PM	#49
Phobia Guest Casino cash: $	For months we've heard Huard haters say he needs to be cut and that he has no business in the NFL. Then he turns in a 9/10 first half and 17/23 overall performance and you guys are still trying to push that agenda. The Chiefs lost this game but they didn't lose because of anything Damon Huard did.
Posts: n/a

09-17-2006, 07:03 PM	#51
Hammock Parties I'll be back. Join Date: Nov 2002 Casino cash: $4430478	Exactly. The Huard Haters were wrong. He does not suck. A year ago no one thought he was even capable of completing 50 percent of his passes. __________________ Chiefs game films
Posts: 278,674

09-17-2006, 07:08 PM	#53
Mosbonian On Hiatus Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $2289700	Being good vs. does not suck...hmmmm I want a QB that is more than adequate..... If he comes back 2 weeks from now and leads the team to victory with real stats, then come talk to me. Yes...he played adequate....yes, he isn't the total reason we lost today. But to be satisfied that we scored 6 points on a team that was ripe for the plucking can't make you completely happy. mmaddog *******
Posts: 11,350

09-17-2006, 07:16 PM	#55
jspchief BAMF Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Your Face Casino cash: $9998710	Using his completion percentage as an argument for a game well played is the textbook example of stats not telling the entire story. So Huard is clutch running an offense so scaled back that we can't win a game when we hold the opponent to 6 points. Great. That and a quarter will get you 25 cents. A well-oiled machine that goes nowhere is still worthless, no matter how well-oiled it is. If the Chiefs ever need someone to captain an ineffective offense, Damon Huard is their man. In the meantime, if they stil lwant to win games it's time to see if someone else is more capable of moving the ball. __________________ Courage is not the absence of fear but rather the judgment that something is more important than fear. The brave may not live forever but the cautious do not live at all.
Posts: 27,207