How come chester never gets any props for his play? - Page 4

**Tribal Warfare** · 09-27-2000, 12:04 PM

I know that glock jumps off sides alot but i hate to think where our d would be without his presure up the middle. and it looks like dan williams is finally playing for all that cash carl threw at him!

redbrian · 09-28-2000, 10:07 AM

He's "through with that thread". Maybe you can e-mail him and talk about it.

Raiderhater · 09-28-2000, 10:07 AM

Morph: apparently so, it made sense to Cannibal and his twin Clint.

Clint: yes I said objectivity, of course, to understand, one would have to remember and comprehend our previous discussions about this subject, which would also require memory retention. Do you have to work at being this stupid or does it just come natural. Your statements about him being the worst DT in the league jumps to mind as something that lacks objectivity as well as your entirely conflicting statements on this thread.

Im trying not to laugh.

09-28-2000, 10:08 AM

All attempts at LOGIC within this thread is a waste of time. Clint and Titis would rather thumb thier noses at each other all day. Have fun boys! Come again when you can't stay so long!

------------------
[b]ct
Give TRich the Ball!!!

redbrian · 09-28-2000, 10:10 AM

You're right. I'm not being objective. It's my O-P-I-N-I-O-N that Glock is one of the least productive starting DTs in the NFL.

Just like it's your opinion that coaching is the only reason that KC lost that '95 playoff game, and not Elliot's 3 missed FGs & 1 missed extra point, or Bono's 3 INTs.

redbrian · 09-28-2000, 10:11 AM

CoryT,

I did manage to respond to you about Glock.

Fort Chief · 09-28-2000, 10:13 AM

The bottom line is that Schottenheimer had us in a position to win the game. The lack of skill position talent is what lost the game. Three interceptions by your boy and three missed field goals and a missed extra point. Titus said it was not Bono's or Elliot's fault, but Marty Schottenheimers. If those two worthless players had done their jobs we would have won the game.

Let me clue you guys into to a simple concept...

You cannot run the ball for TD's on everydown. Eventually you're going to have to use the QB and the field goal kicker. And our QB and field goal kicker both belonged on the bench from day one.

I ask you again...

How far would we have gone in the playoffs with Steve Bono and Lin Elliot?

WarPaint · 09-28-2000, 11:36 AM

Glock has been getting better penetration this year but the fact remains, for the money that he is making, all that penetration should result in more tackles and more sacks. I've seen more excuses for Chester than any other Chief player Elvis and Carl included.

On the topic of wasted money, our OL should have to refund 80% of their paychecks for the abominable run blocking that is going on. Shields isn't going to get his big payday if KC only averages 2.0 a carry.

Nelson Muntz · 09-28-2000, 02:57 PM

"It's my O-P-I-N-I-O-N that Glock is one of the least productive starting DTs in the NFL."

Holmgren's opinion, " But it appears to me, their defensive line, they’re very much in sync with their pass rush and Chester McGlockton is an outstanding player. He is a load. He kind of anchors the middle there. They have a good defensive line.
[url="http://www.seahawks.com/home/seahawks_mainpage.cfm?cont_id=28874"]http://www.seahawks.com/home/seahawks_mainpage.cfm?cont_id=28874[/url]

Hummm, guess who's opinion means more Clint.

Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you're going to get...

09-28-2000, 03:04 PM

Exactly my point way back towards the end of #28. If the opposition is concerned about Chester in particular, then there really is no argument. He [b]IS[/b] making an impact for our defense!!

------------------
[b]ct
Give TRich the Ball!!!

redbrian · 09-28-2000, 03:07 PM

Wonderful. Holmgren likes Chester. He also liked Gilbert Brown. If he's more concerned about Glock than any other KC D-lineman, he's making a mistake. Hicks will continue to rack up sacks until other teams realize that Glock is no sack machine.

redbrian · 09-28-2000, 03:09 PM

and he's still not worth $3-4 million per season.

09-28-2000, 03:12 PM

Clint,

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>
"Na nanny boo-boo, stick your head in doo-doo!"
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

[img]http://www.ChiefsPlanet.com/ubb/tongue.gif[/img]

------------------
[b]ct
Give TRich the Ball!!!

Nelson Muntz · 09-28-2000, 03:23 PM

Hicks is getting the sacks because of Glock.

If I could find the exact quote I would, but Hicks said as much after the first 2 games.

dabreeze · 09-28-2000, 03:39 PM

What are you talking about? Chester gets plenty of props. A couple times a game he recognized for being in the nuetral zone. When it is all said and done, this will go down as one of the most bone headed moves by the Peterson administration. Trading for and then signing of the league most well known cancers. It is no coincidence that the Chiefs havent made the playoffs since Chesters arrival. The guy is a loser who plays when he feels like playing. If he gave 100%, all the time, AND if he stayed out of the nuetral zone, I would have a different opinion. Al Davis turned the tables on Carl Peterson. First, he takes Gannon, then he gives Chester, than his team eliminates the Chiefs last year. I cant wait to see what happens next.

King_Chief_Fan · 09-28-2000, 03:48 PM

Uh, Gannon was still here when we got Glock...

This repititive boring diatribe brought you by none other than...

09-28-2000, 10:07 AM	#46
redbrian Veteran Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Kansas City MO Casino cash: $10004900	He's "through with that thread". Maybe you can e-mail him and talk about it.
Posts: 3,899

09-28-2000, 10:07 AM	#47
Raiderhater **** the Raiders Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: A Webb of chaos Casino cash: $1652021	Morph: apparently so, it made sense to Cannibal and his twin Clint. Clint: yes I said objectivity, of course, to understand, one would have to remember and comprehend our previous discussions about this subject, which would also require memory retention. Do you have to work at being this stupid or does it just come natural. Your statements about him being the worst DT in the league jumps to mind as something that lacks objectivity as well as your entirely conflicting statements on this thread. Im trying not to laugh.
Posts: 28,364

09-28-2000, 10:08 AM	#48
Coogs Guest Casino cash: $	All attempts at LOGIC within this thread is a waste of time. Clint and Titis would rather thumb thier noses at each other all day. Have fun boys! Come again when you can't stay so long! ------------------ [b]ct Give TRich the Ball!!!</B>
Posts: n/a

09-28-2000, 10:10 AM	#49
redbrian Veteran Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Kansas City MO Casino cash: $10004900	You're right. I'm not being objective. It's my O-P-I-N-I-O-N that Glock is one of the least productive starting DTs in the NFL. Just like it's your opinion that coaching is the only reason that KC lost that '95 playoff game, and not Elliot's 3 missed FGs & 1 missed extra point, or Bono's 3 INTs.
Posts: 3,899

09-28-2000, 10:11 AM	#50
redbrian Veteran Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Kansas City MO Casino cash: $10004900	CoryT, I did manage to respond to you about Glock.
Posts: 3,899

09-27-2000, 12:04 PM
Tribal Warfare The Boom Boom Room Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Far Beyond Comprehension Casino cash: $342813	I know that glock jumps off sides alot but i hate to think where our d would be without his presure up the middle. and it looks like dan williams is finally playing for all that cash carl threw at him!
Posts: 42,218

09-28-2000, 10:13 AM	#51
Fort Chief Starter Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Texas, USA Casino cash: $10004900	The bottom line is that Schottenheimer had us in a position to win the game. The lack of skill position talent is what lost the game. Three interceptions by your boy and three missed field goals and a missed extra point. Titus said it was not Bono's or Elliot's fault, but Marty Schottenheimers. If those two worthless players had done their jobs we would have won the game. Let me clue you guys into to a simple concept... You cannot run the ball for TD's on everydown. Eventually you're going to have to use the QB and the field goal kicker. And our QB and field goal kicker both belonged on the bench from day one. I ask you again... How far would we have gone in the playoffs with Steve Bono and Lin Elliot?
Posts: 643

09-28-2000, 11:36 AM	#52
WarPaint Starter Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: KCMO Casino cash: $10004900	Glock has been getting better penetration this year but the fact remains, for the money that he is making, all that penetration should result in more tackles and more sacks. I've seen more excuses for Chester than any other Chief player Elvis and Carl included. On the topic of wasted money, our OL should have to refund 80% of their paychecks for the abominable run blocking that is going on. Shields isn't going to get his big payday if KC only averages 2.0 a carry.
Posts: 782

09-28-2000, 02:57 PM	#53
Nelson Muntz Ha Ha Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $10004900	"It's my O-P-I-N-I-O-N that Glock is one of the least productive starting DTs in the NFL." Holmgren's opinion, " But it appears to me, their defensive line, they’re very much in sync with their pass rush and Chester McGlockton is an outstanding player. He is a load. He kind of anchors the middle there. They have a good defensive line. [url="http://www.seahawks.com/home/seahawks_mainpage.cfm?cont_id=28874"]http://www.seahawks.com/home/seahawks_mainpage.cfm?cont_id=28874[/url] Hummm, guess who's opinion means more Clint. Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you're going to get...<BR>
Posts: 1,012

09-28-2000, 03:04 PM	#54
Coogs Guest Casino cash: $	Exactly my point way back towards the end of #28. If the opposition is concerned about Chester in particular, then there really is no argument. He [b]IS[/b] making an impact for our defense!! ------------------ [b]ct Give TRich the Ball!!!</B>
Posts: n/a

09-28-2000, 03:07 PM	#55
redbrian Veteran Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Kansas City MO Casino cash: $10004900	Wonderful. Holmgren likes Chester. He also liked Gilbert Brown. If he's more concerned about Glock than any other KC D-lineman, he's making a mistake. Hicks will continue to rack up sacks until other teams realize that Glock is no sack machine.
Posts: 3,899

09-28-2000, 03:09 PM	#56
redbrian Veteran Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Kansas City MO Casino cash: $10004900	and he's still not worth $3-4 million per season.
Posts: 3,899

09-28-2000, 03:12 PM	#57
Coogs Guest Casino cash: $	Clint, <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Helvetica, verdana, ariel">quote:</font><HR> "Na nanny boo-boo, stick your head in doo-doo!" <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> [img]http://www.ChiefsPlanet.com/ubb/tongue.gif[/img] ------------------ [b]ct Give TRich the Ball!!!</B>
Posts: n/a

09-28-2000, 03:23 PM	#58
Nelson Muntz Ha Ha Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $10004900	Hicks is getting the sacks because of Glock. If I could find the exact quote I would, but Hicks said as much after the first 2 games.
Posts: 1,012

09-28-2000, 03:39 PM	#59
dabreeze Starter Join Date: Sep 2000 Casino cash: $10004900	What are you talking about? Chester gets plenty of props. A couple times a game he recognized for being in the nuetral zone. When it is all said and done, this will go down as one of the most bone headed moves by the Peterson administration. Trading for and then signing of the league most well known cancers. It is no coincidence that the Chiefs havent made the playoffs since Chesters arrival. The guy is a loser who plays when he feels like playing. If he gave 100%, all the time, AND if he stayed out of the nuetral zone, I would have a different opinion. Al Davis turned the tables on Carl Peterson. First, he takes Gannon, then he gives Chester, than his team eliminates the Chiefs last year. I cant wait to see what happens next.
Posts: 216

09-28-2000, 03:48 PM	#60
King_Chief_Fan Praise Him Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: none ya Casino cash: $5835486	Uh, Gannon was still here when we got Glock... This repititive boring diatribe brought you by none other than...
Posts: 12,181