The OFFICIAL LT>LJ THREAD - Page 4

LTforMVP · 11:14 AM

As a public service to some of you ignorant Chiefs fans I have decided to update you weekly with the greatness that is LaDanian Tomlinson.

LaDanian Tomlinson is only half a year older than Larry Johnson but while Larry Johnson was whining and pouting because his white Super Bowl winning coach couldnt couldnt relate to him LT was busy putting up awesome years behind a weak Chargers offensive line.

LT is, was, and will always be a better RB than LJ

Tomlinson

+--------------------------+-------------------------+
| Rushing | Receiving |
+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+
| Year TM | G | Att Yards Y/A TD | Rec Yards Y/R TD |
+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+
| 2001 sdg | 16 | 339 1236 3.6 10 | 59 367 6.2 0 |
| 2002 sdg | 16 | 372 1683 4.5 14 | 79 489 6.2 1 |
| 2003 sdg | 16 | 313 1645 5.3 13 | 100 725 7.2 4 |
| 2004 sdg | 15 | 339 1335 3.9 17 | 53 441 8.3 1 |
| 2005 sdg | 16 | 339 1462 4.3 18 | 51 370 7.3 2 |
| 2006 sdg | 11 | 258 1324 5.1 23 | 51 470 9.2 3 |
+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+
| TOTAL | 91 | 1960 8507 4.4 95 | 393 2862 7.3 11 |
+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+

Seasons among the league's top 10
Rushes: 2001-3, 2002-2, 2004-6, 2005-5, 2006-3
Rushing yards: 2001-9, 2002-2, 2003-3, 2004-7, 2005-6, 2006-1
Rushing TDs: 2001-4t, 2002-5, 2003-6, 2004-1, 2005-3, 2006-1
Receptions: 2003-4
Yards from scrimmage: 2001-9, 2002-3, 2003-1, 2004-5t, 2005-5, 2006-1
Rush/Receive TDs: 2001-10t, 2002-6, 2003-3t, 2004-2, 2005-3, 2006-1

Among the league's all-time top 50
Rushes: 28
Rushing yards: 24
Rushing TDs: 8
Yards from scrimmage: 43
Rush/Receive TDs: 13

Larry Johnson (AKA DiaperBoy)
+--------------------------+-------------------------+
| Rushing | Receiving |
+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+
| Year TM | G | Att Yards Y/A TD | Rec Yards Y/R TD |
+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+
| 2003 kan | 6 | 20 85 4.2 1 | 1 2 2.0 0 |
| 2004 kan | 10 | 120 581 4.8 9 | 22 278 12.6 2 |
| 2005 kan | 16 | 336 1750 5.2 20 | 33 343 10.4 1 |
| 2006 kan | 11 | 310 1312 4.2 13 | 32 375 11.7 2 |
+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+
| TOTAL | 44 | 786 3728 4.7 43 | 88 998 11.3 5 |
+----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+

Seasons among the league's top 10
Rushes: 2005-7, 2006-1
Rushing yards: 2005-3, 2006-2
Rushing TDs: 2005-2, 2006-2
Yards from scrimmage: 2005-2, 2006-2
Rush/Receive TDs: 2005-2, 2006-2

Larry Johnson is not in the all-time top 50 in any major category.

**DaFace** · 11-28-2006, 11:09 PM

From the posts on this thread, one would think that the quality of the running back of the team one roots for is directly proportional to the size of one's member.

They're both great backs. Other than that, who cares?

BigRock · 11-28-2006, 11:09 PM

I anxiously await LTforMVP's "THE OFFICIAL RYAN SIMS > SHAWNE MERRIMAN" thread, where he'll show us how having more time in the league to earn stats makes Sims the better player.

**cdcox** · 11-29-2006, 12:12 AM

HAHAH based on his posts, I'm guessing that LTforMVP doesn't know difference between dog years and people years either.

nychief · 11-29-2006, 12:22 AM

LT has 6 yeas starting to LJ's 1.

Demonpenz · 11-29-2006, 12:53 AM

your missing one important stat SUPERBOWL WINS

**Mr. Kotter** · 11-29-2006, 12:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nychief

LT has 6 yeas starting to LJ's 1.

This douchebag is apparently too big a moron to figure that out....

**luv** · 11-29-2006, 12:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nychief

LT has 6 yeas starting to LJ's 1.

But, but...they're the same age!

**Mr. Kotter** · 11-29-2006, 01:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luv

But, but...they're the same age!

Personally, I think we ought to base it on CAREER average per carry....

LJ wins 4.8 to LT's 4.3.....

So there, Mr. Douchebag Slurpy-Boy Charger Homo fan.

LTforMVP · 11-29-2006, 01:05 AM

Age is much more relevant when talking about how much longer someone will play in the league as well as when they will decline than how many years they have been a starter

Warner starting at later age didnt change the fact that his skills started to decline at the same age as other QBs

|Zach| · 11-29-2006, 01:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LTforMVP

Age is much more relevant when talking about how much longer someone will play in the league as well as when they will decline than how many years they have been a starter

Warner starting at later age didnt change the fact that his skills started to decline at the same age as other QBs

Neither of these backs are at the age where skills decline...

Man, you are really making yourself look like an idiot.

LTforMVP · 11-29-2006, 01:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Kotter

Personally, I think we ought to base it on CAREER average per carry....

LJ wins 4.8 to LT's 4.3.....

So there, Mr. Douchebag Slurpy-Boy Charger Homo fan.

Michael Turners career yards per carry is 5.9. Does that mean he is better than LJ?

LTforMVP · 11-29-2006, 01:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by (Zach)

Neither of these backs are at the age where skills decline...

Man, you are really making yourself look like an idiot.

Im well aware of that.

The point is since their careers from here on out should peak and valley at around the same time LJ will ALWAYS be in LT's shadow

|Zach| · 11-29-2006, 01:11 AM

No biggie, aside from a few games LT has been a mediocre player against the Chiefs...he isn't a game changer when he plays the guys in red...give him a few receptions...he cant actually run against us. Thats what controls games...

A dominant runner can control the clock, and impose his will on the pace of the game in a way a good receiver can't.

Chiefs are not impressed, and they shouldn't be...not by LT and not by Charger fan's need for validation.

thedude · 11-29-2006, 01:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LTforMVP

Im well aware of that.

The point is since their careers from here on out should peak and valley at around the same time LJ will ALWAYS be in LT's shadow

9 Straight 100 yard games in first 9 starts WHAT?

Ebolapox · 11-29-2006, 01:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LTforMVP

Im well aware of that.

The point is since their careers from here on out should peak and valley at around the same time LJ will ALWAYS be in LT's shadow

you are such an ignorant cock

11-28-2006, 09:47 PM
LTforMVP Starter Join Date: Nov 2006 Casino cash: $10004900	The OFFICIAL LT>LJ THREAD As a public service to some of you ignorant Chiefs fans I have decided to update you weekly with the greatness that is LaDanian Tomlinson. LaDanian Tomlinson is only half a year older than Larry Johnson but while Larry Johnson was whining and pouting because his white Super Bowl winning coach couldnt couldnt relate to him LT was busy putting up awesome years behind a weak Chargers offensive line. LT is, was, and will always be a better RB than LJ Tomlinson +--------------------------+-------------------------+ \| Rushing \| Receiving \| +----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+ \| Year TM \| G \| Att Yards Y/A TD \| Rec Yards Y/R TD \| +----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+ \| 2001 sdg \| 16 \| 339 1236 3.6 10 \| 59 367 6.2 0 \| \| 2002 sdg \| 16 \| 372 1683 4.5 14 \| 79 489 6.2 1 \| \| 2003 sdg \| 16 \| 313 1645 5.3 13 \| 100 725 7.2 4 \| \| 2004 sdg \| 15 \| 339 1335 3.9 17 \| 53 441 8.3 1 \| \| 2005 sdg \| 16 \| 339 1462 4.3 18 \| 51 370 7.3 2 \| \| 2006 sdg \| 11 \| 258 1324 5.1 23 \| 51 470 9.2 3 \| +----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+ \| TOTAL \| 91 \| 1960 8507 4.4 95 \| 393 2862 7.3 11 \| +----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+ Seasons among the league's top 10 Rushes: 2001-3, 2002-2, 2004-6, 2005-5, 2006-3 Rushing yards: 2001-9, 2002-2, 2003-3, 2004-7, 2005-6, 2006-1 Rushing TDs: 2001-4t, 2002-5, 2003-6, 2004-1, 2005-3, 2006-1 Receptions: 2003-4 Yards from scrimmage: 2001-9, 2002-3, 2003-1, 2004-5t, 2005-5, 2006-1 Rush/Receive TDs: 2001-10t, 2002-6, 2003-3t, 2004-2, 2005-3, 2006-1 Among the league's all-time top 50 Rushes: 28 Rushing yards: 24 Rushing TDs: 8 Yards from scrimmage: 43 Rush/Receive TDs: 13 Larry Johnson (AKA DiaperBoy) +--------------------------+-------------------------+ \| Rushing \| Receiving \| +----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+ \| Year TM \| G \| Att Yards Y/A TD \| Rec Yards Y/R TD \| +----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+ \| 2003 kan \| 6 \| 20 85 4.2 1 \| 1 2 2.0 0 \| \| 2004 kan \| 10 \| 120 581 4.8 9 \| 22 278 12.6 2 \| \| 2005 kan \| 16 \| 336 1750 5.2 20 \| 33 343 10.4 1 \| \| 2006 kan \| 11 \| 310 1312 4.2 13 \| 32 375 11.7 2 \| +----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+ \| TOTAL \| 44 \| 786 3728 4.7 43 \| 88 998 11.3 5 \| +----------+-----+--------------------------+-------------------------+ Seasons among the league's top 10 Rushes: 2005-7, 2006-1 Rushing yards: 2005-3, 2006-2 Rushing TDs: 2005-2, 2006-2 Yards from scrimmage: 2005-2, 2006-2 Rush/Receive TDs: 2005-2, 2006-2 Larry Johnson is not in the all-time top 50 in any major category. Last edited by LTforMVP; 12-06-2006 at 11:14 AM..
Posts: 136

11-28-2006, 11:09 PM	#46
DaFace Kind of a mod Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Donkey Land Casino cash: $-1673101	From the posts on this thread, one would think that the quality of the running back of the team one roots for is directly proportional to the size of one's member. They're both great backs. Other than that, who cares?
Posts: 53,124

11-28-2006, 11:09 PM	#47
BigRock Pritay Pritay Pritay Good Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: The State of Euphoria Casino cash: $805412	I anxiously await LTforMVP's "THE OFFICIAL RYAN SIMS > SHAWNE MERRIMAN" thread, where he'll show us how having more time in the league to earn stats makes Sims the better player.
Posts: 6,987

11-29-2006, 12:12 AM	#48
cdcox www.nfl-forecast.com Join Date: Sep 2000 Casino cash: $-478231	HAHAH based on his posts, I'm guessing that LTforMVP doesn't know difference between dog years and people years either.
Posts: 46,032

11-29-2006, 12:22 AM	#49
nychief MVP Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: NYC Casino cash: $5469466	LT has 6 yeas starting to LJ's 1. __________________ Good Time Charlie, Uncle Doobie and the Great Frisco Freakout.
Posts: 8,145

11-29-2006, 12:53 AM	#50
Demonpenz Woman should only make babies Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Apartment "G UNIT!" Casino cash: $-213864	your missing one important stat SUPERBOWL WINS __________________
Posts: 54,943

11-29-2006, 01:05 AM	#54
LTforMVP Starter Join Date: Nov 2006 Casino cash: $10004900	Age is much more relevant when talking about how much longer someone will play in the league as well as when they will decline than how many years they have been a starter Warner starting at later age didnt change the fact that his skills started to decline at the same age as other QBs
Posts: 136

11-29-2006, 01:11 AM	#58
\|Zach\| For The Glory Of The City Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Kansas City Casino cash: $3176768	No biggie, aside from a few games LT has been a mediocre player against the Chiefs...he isn't a game changer when he plays the guys in red...give him a few receptions...he cant actually run against us. Thats what controls games... A dominant runner can control the clock, and impose his will on the pace of the game in a way a good receiver can't. Chiefs are not impressed, and they shouldn't be...not by LT and not by Charger fan's need for validation.
Posts: 54,688