Chiefs Words from Andy Reid - Page 4

T-post Tom · 12:44 AM

. ,

Bag-o-dicks to the repost police.

philfree · 03-21-2013, 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020

The whole ****ing thing has gotten stale.

The Chiefs don't lose enough to get the best QB, except for last year and they ****ed it all up, and they don't win enough to win a SB.

Sad but true. That might change if we'd go all in on QBs this year.

O.city · 03-21-2013, 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC

No I wouldn't take Geno. I'd wait to take a better QB prospect in a future class.

Geno's ceiling isn't that high IMO. It's more bust than boom.

Considering the guy you like best is a 3/4 roud career backup type qb, not sure how knowledgable you are but I digress.

I personally don't think Alex smith is as bad as some are parading so I think we going to have to be looking for a developmental guy and hope we get lucky cause we aren't going to be in range foray blue chippers without trading up

**Rausch** · 03-21-2013, 10:50 AM

Unless Phat Andy pulls the ****ing Statue of Liberty out of his ass and floats over the MGM Grand we'll be in fine position to draft a top QB for years...

RunKC · 03-21-2013, 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city

Considering the guy you like best is a 3/4 roud career backup type qb, not sure how knowledgable you are but I digress.

I personally don't think Alex smith is as bad as some are parading so I think we going to have to be looking for a developmental guy and hope we get lucky cause we aren't going to be in range foray blue chippers without trading up

I've let Tyler Wilson go because he's not a real possibility anymore. Geno fans haven't done that and they need to.

I'm not the biggest proponent of Alex Smith, but he's done enough to deserve a chance with our staff IMO.

I'll take a strong chance of a playoff win why we wait and get our QB in the draft.

jd1020 · 03-21-2013, 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC

I've let Tyler Wilson go because he's not a real possibility anymore. Geno fans haven't done that and they need to.

Well... Unlike Tyler Wilson, who shit himself a hundred times, Geno Smith has been impressive and remains in play at #1 overall, however unlikely it may seem.

BigCatDaddy · 03-21-2013, 11:30 AM

I still laugh when people point to QB's taken in the mid to late first as examples of why you don't need to be at the top of the draft. They obviously missed that there is a new CBA and QB's are getting taken much higher then they were before. See guys like Jake Locker, Ryan Tanehill, and Christian Ponder. If you think a QB that was considered neck and neck for the #1 pick slips to the 20's these days you need to do the world a favor and drink a nice tall glass of antifreeze because it ain't happening. You might as well compare arena league stats to nfl stats because comparing comparing the draft 7-8 years ago to today is about the same thing.

RunKC · 03-21-2013, 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020

Well... Unlike Tyler Wilson, who shit himself a hundred times, Geno Smith has been impressive and remains in play at #1 overall, however unlikely it may seem.

He's so in play, that our GM and coach didn't give a flying **** about him at his pro day. They went to see a guy in Oregon who didn't even work out.

houstonwhodat · 03-21-2013, 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC

We are still looking for a legit QB now... IF we are too chickenshit to take one now, we will be chickenshits then...

I think Chase Daniel would be better than Alex Smith.

B14ckmon · 03-21-2013, 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC

He's so in play, that our GM and coach didn't give a flying **** about him at his pro day. They went to see a guy in Oregon who didn't even work out.

That's because they traded for a QB that is a day 1 perfect fit for Reid's offense.

BigCatDaddy · 03-21-2013, 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by houstonwhodat

I think Chase Daniel would be better than Alex Smith.

I think Chlamydia would be better then Gonorrhea.

philfree · 03-21-2013, 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy

I still laugh when people point to QB's taken in the mid to late first as examples of why you don't need to be at the top of the draft. They obviously missed that there is a new CBA and QB's are getting taken much higher then they were before. See guys like Jake Locker, Ryan Tanehill, and Christian Ponder. If you think a QB that was considered neck and neck for the #1 pick slips to the 20's these days you need to do the world a favor and drink a nice tall glass of antifreeze because it ain't happening. You might as well compare arena league stats to nfl stats because comparing comparing the draft 7-8 years ago to today is about the same thing.

We'll see how this plays out in regards to Barkley. He might still go top ten but then again he might not.

BigCatDaddy · 03-21-2013, 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree

We'll see how this plays out in regards to Barkley. He might still go top ten but then again he might not.

I don't give a shit about Barkley. It's common sense that QB's are pushed up higher then they once were when teams would have been forced to give them twice as much money as they are now. It's not rocket science.

Do you think in this day and age that a QB that had a 50/50 shot of going #1 in the draft makes it to the 20's?

philfree · 03-21-2013, 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy

I don't give a shit about Barkley. It's common sense that QB's are pushed up higher then they once were when teams would have been forced to give them twice as much money as they are now. It's not rocket science.

Do you think in this day and age that a QB that had a 50/50 shot of going #1 in the draft makes it to the 20's?

Barkley at on time was considered to have a shot to go #1 now he's not going to so we'll see how far he falls. He may not make it out of the top 10. Then again he might slip out of the top ten and if he does he might slip all the way to the 20s. Time will tell.

As far as common sense is concerned QBs have always been over drafted and the new CBA makes that a little easier. That doesn't mean there won't ever be a decent QB drafted later in the 1st round though.

So are you hoping for another 2 win season so we can get that franchise QB?

**Mav** · 03-21-2013, 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz

I hope you love Alex Smith a lot Mr. Reid, because he's probably going to get you fired.

Heard this when harbaugh kept him as his starter, by more than one person.....

How did that work out for harbs?

**Mav** · 03-21-2013, 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief

He's probably better than Kyle Orton...but either of their ceilings aren't even close to that of Geno.

This is such a reach of a statement. In the right situation, perhaps, but if he ends up in say jax, or in oakland, hes doomed......

03-21-2013, 12:30 AM
T-post Tom Threepeat! Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Milk/Honey/Gazland Casino cash: $4247293	Words from Andy Reid . , Bag-o-dicks to the repost police. Last edited by T-post Tom; 03-21-2013 at 12:44 AM..
Posts: 20,409

03-21-2013, 11:30 AM	#51
BigCatDaddy The Beast Inside Your Head Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Parts Unknown Casino cash: $1479122	I still laugh when people point to QB's taken in the mid to late first as examples of why you don't need to be at the top of the draft. They obviously missed that there is a new CBA and QB's are getting taken much higher then they were before. See guys like Jake Locker, Ryan Tanehill, and Christian Ponder. If you think a QB that was considered neck and neck for the #1 pick slips to the 20's these days you need to do the world a favor and drink a nice tall glass of antifreeze because it ain't happening. You might as well compare arena league stats to nfl stats because comparing comparing the draft 7-8 years ago to today is about the same thing.
Posts: 25,945