Somebody answer this,the election for prez......

[ROYC75]

Al Gore claims to have won the popular vote,I don't buy this yet! He has won the total to this date by ,what 200-300,000 votes.Look at this and tell me what you think.

California has 1 millon overseas ballots that are not counted yet,they will not count them because it will not change the outcome on the Californias vote. Futhermore,more states are in the same mode that the outcome will not change the states.

With this in mind,It will change the total outcome of the popular vote 1 way or the other.Now I don't know how that would come up in the totals,but I would bet that all states that are like this are the overseas ballots that would push Bush over the hump on popular votes!

IMHO,Gore claims let every vote be counted.....Let it count in all states too,then stop crying about not winning the election .

Does anybody feel this way? Just looking for the truth to this election,no clouds over the next Prez !

[Bob Dole]

<h1>ARGH!</H1>

Sorry. Bob Dole just read a similar thread "somewhere else" and needed to vent.

[Joe Seahawk]

<h1>Hey Bob, you taught me a new trick!!! :)</H1>




[This message has been edited by Joe Seahawk (edited 12-02-2000).]

[Bob Dole]

<font color="red"><H4>Bob Dole is glad he could help</H4></font>

[Joe Seahawk]

<font color="blue"><H4>this is cool thanks! :eek:</H4></font>

[This message has been edited by Joe Seahawk (edited 12-03-2000).]

[Bob Dole]

Bob Dole is going to have to see if he can't get Kyle to block the font="blue" tag...

Actually, Joe, Bob Dole has a new Sunday bar acquaintance that's a hardcore SeaChicken fan. We have a blast ragging each other every week. The staff is even giving Bob Dole shit about corrupting the guy, since he now yells like a maniac during the game.

[Bob Dole]

And in the "basically useless stuff" category is:

<font face="tahoma"> Changing the </font><font face="courier">font face in </font> your messages <font face="arial"> as you go.</font>

[This message has been edited by Robert_Dole (edited 12-02-2000).]

[Joe Seahawk]

yerwatchinghardball

[img]http://a799.ms.akamai.net/7/799/388/3295f5be5b6cfc/www.msnbc.com/news/477519.jpg[/img]

[DanT]

Hey jcl-kcfan,

The ACLU agrees with you that the 2nd amendment does not make any distinction about kinds of arms. Here's an excerpt from the following link that briefly describes their position on guns:
[url="http://www.aclu.org/library/aaguns.html"]http://www.aclu.org/library/aaguns.html[/url]

IN BRIEF
The national ACLU is neutral on the issue of gun control. We believe that the Constitution contains no barriers to reasonable regulations of gun ownership. If we can license and register cars, we can license and register guns.

Most opponents of gun control concede that the Second Amendment certainly does not guarantee an individual's right to own bazookas, missiles or nuclear warheads. Yet these, like rifles, pistols and even submachine guns, are arms.

The question therefore is not whether to restrict arms ownership, but how much to restrict it. If that is a question left open by the Constitution, then it is a question for Congress to decide.

[DanT]

Hey jcl-kcfan,

By the way, I'm a like a lot of ACLU members in believing that the widespread ownership of guns by our citizens is good for protecting our liberty.