|
|
![]() |
#1 |
I'll be back.
Join Date: Nov 2002
Casino cash: $1010478
|
tyreek hill hasnt dont shit this preseason.
|
Posts: 296,745
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
I didn’t say mud, I said crud.
Join Date: Jan 2012
Casino cash: $-1371974
|
It's fairly common for 5th round WRs to be somewhat quiet. I'm not the least bit worried.
__________________
Attendance Chief record 11-9 |
Posts: 30,789
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Israel
Casino cash: $10006088
|
|
Posts: 616
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: San Antonio Tx.
Casino cash: $314454
|
How long until we get "Disappointed in Tyreek Hill" thread?
__________________
Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning: Matt once made a very nice play in Seattle where he spun away from a pass rusher and hit Bowe off his back foot for a first down. One of the best plays Matt has ever made. |
Posts: 68,424
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Replaced by a future HOFer !!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: donkey land
Casino cash: $6487901
|
Our special teams return blocking has been very inconsistent and that's being generous. Give it time to get better. I don't care how fast and quick our return guy is, if we can't get 2-3 good initial blocks so that Hill can find the seam much quicker then it will be underwhelming for all our return guys. I won't give Hill a pass either and he is realizing just how fast this game is and he can't afford to dance too much but I will give him the benefit of the doubt at this point that his dancing is because he is not getting the initial good blocks to find and get to the seam quicker whether it's left,right or up the middle.
|
Posts: 27,108
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Dumbass!
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Leading the Marty bashing
Casino cash: $10029395
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() |
|
Posts: 70,769
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Replaced by a future HOFer !!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: donkey land
Casino cash: $6487901
|
About last night's game. I say reserve judgement on most of the issues we all saw because the majority of them can be worked out IMHO.
Like some of you said, we had several rookies taking No.1 snaps and they saw first hand just how athletically fast and hard hitting the NFL is at the starting level. Will our young 2ndary fold and let last night get in their head and quit competing like Cooper? Or will they take the Peters attitude ? The only thing I am sure of is Cooper is done IMHO. It's sad because he is athletically gifted but his psyche is shot to Mav's earlier point threads ago. Wait and see on our young 2ndary. Milk makes a good point about Ehringer and Fulton and the differences. If there was anybody who got initiated the most last night about how athletically fast and hard hitting the NFL is at the starting level it was Ehringer. Will he get nastier with his psyche and weight training or will he fold ? His strength training will take awhile so hopefully by playoff time his strength has improved by at least 35-40% and his psyche is more "piss and vinegar". Again, wait and see. Foles needs even more "wait and see" than anyone else IMHO. The guy has only been with us for a little of over 2 weeks with less reps than Alex to get a chemistry going with any of our WRs let alone what he has in our o-line and how to adjust to that ongoing work in progress. And there are more wrinkles to the offense since his Andy days. I assure you Foles will not be a typical backup QB in practice and will get more reps than your typical b/u QB IMHO. IMHO 'holding on to the ball too long" and "missing high" at times are due more to getting used to his surroundings and what he is working with personnel wise(a la chemistry) than it is Foles hitting his ceiling. Again, wait and see. One last thing I am definitely sure of is this, that Foles is faaaaaaar more comfortable standing in the pocket than Smith will ever be and why some of you said he held onto the ball too long. We are so used to Smith taking off immediately when his primary is covered that when we have a QB that actually likes to go through all of his progressions allowing other WRs to get open it seems foreign to us. ![]() With that being said, if our o-line does not progress to pristine performance for Alex he will have "happy feet" all year thus severely limiting our ball skill players from making plays relying on his legs racking up 65 to 85 yds rushing(how long before he gets hurt?). And this is not good with our defense being in severe "flux" right now because we will not be scoring near as much and will lose more games if our defense does not fully come together. Because Andy knows that Foles is more comfortable in the pocket and has a much deeper arm for Conley,Streater and Hill, he will have a decision to make. So my question at this point is will we have another similar Grbac vs Gannon situation on our hands by mid-season and how soon will there be a thread "at this point of the season, Smith or Foles"?. Not trying to ![]()
__________________
Last edited by Chiefshrink; 08-21-2016 at 12:22 PM.. |
Posts: 27,108
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Aug 2008
Casino cash: $-1565503
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 51,560
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Don't Tease Me
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: KS
Casino cash: $11047037
|
Hill has looked quick and crisp.
He had a decent return last night. Once we include him in the game plan i think he can replace DaT without much trouble. Charles/Hill to play the gadget role with Ware getting increased carries. Instead of so many WR bubble screens, get the ball to Charles out there.
__________________
|
Posts: 95,626
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
|
Posts: 88,960
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
MVP
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Studio City, CA
Casino cash: $2008742
|
I can't believe nobody mentioned Zombo. He played like dogshit.
|
Posts: 13,816
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
MVP
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Canada
Casino cash: $6790890
|
|
Posts: 8,151
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Dumbass!
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Leading the Marty bashing
Casino cash: $10029395
|
I am not nearly as impressed with Foles as most are.
He holds the ball too long and is inaccurate, and when delivers those balls high and late over the middle, he's going to get the receivers killed if he isn't picked.
__________________
![]() |
Posts: 70,769
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
MVP
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Canada
Casino cash: $6790890
|
And he hasn't received 1/20th of the reps the other qbs have garnered. Let's hope he never sees the field this year, as that would mean Alex is healthy, and in charge. Foles is a more than adequate #2.
|
Posts: 8,151
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Supporter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Highlandville, MO
Casino cash: $82248
|
This is how I saw him too.
__________________
Genesis 1:1 In the beginning, God created the Heavens and the Earth. Following the historical accounts and the genealogy from that point on, the age of the Earth is approximately 6000-7000 years old. The Big Bullshit Theory is a lie. It and the evolution theory go against real science. Satan has used our public school system to brainwash everyone into believing these lies. Be not decieved. |
Posts: 13,318
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
|