Chiefs Alex Smith did, does, and will always suck. - Page 524

**Mav** · 10-29-2013, 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigjosh006

to add to this, the 2011 patriots, 2009 colts, 2008 cards, and 2007 patriots also say HAI!

You would put that Cards team on there? That was a really good defense. Hell that was a great super bowl period.

But yeah.

Good list.

bigjosh · 10-29-2013, 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mavericks Ace

The broncos last year say whatsup.

The 2011 15-1 packers say HI, Chiefs lone loss.

The 2007 pats.

Good post by you.

2010 is really the only super bowl I remember that one of these firepower offenses with a mediocre to poor d won it all.

bigjosh · 10-29-2013, 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mavericks Ace

You would put that Cards team on there? That was a really good defense. Hell that was a great super bowl period.

But yeah.

Good list.

what I was getting at is that it was a "high flying superpower offense"

you are right though I was hesitant to put them on there.

but they did have a **** of a good offense with warner there.

**Mav** · 10-29-2013, 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigjosh006

what I was getting at is that it was a "high flying superpower offense"

you are right though I was hesitant to put them on there.

but they did have a **** of a good offense with warner there.

oh absolutely. Not questioning it. Thought they were one of the more balanced teams, and that the Cards, Steelers was one of the better super bowls in a long time.

You are correct.

**Mav** · 10-29-2013, 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigjosh006

2010 is really the only super bowl I remember that one of these firepower offenses with a mediocre to poor d won it all.

Well, their d much like the 2011 Giants, were completely different animals in the playoffs.

The packers and im not even sure how, with everyone on the IR, just torched people.

BJ Raji, Nick Collins, all just ferocious.

**Shogun** · 10-29-2013, 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VONDIPSHIT

Well the Bronco's can actually win the Superbowl this year. KC well they were a nice story and all but everyone knows they are paper tigers with that offense they have. Teams that live by strong D, weak O and lived off of high turnover diff flame out when it really counts.

so....... kind of like Peyton Manning flames out when it counts? oh....

GoChargers · 10-30-2013, 01:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VONDIPSHIT

Teams that live by strong D, weak O and lived off of high turnover diff flame out when it really counts.

I don't disagree - but teams with Peyton Manning at quarterback usually flame out when it really counts too.

Mother****erJones · 10-30-2013, 05:26 AM

He's 1 and done like 8 of his 12 appearances

Mother****erJones · 10-30-2013, 05:26 AM

He's 1 and done like 8 of his 12 appearances

**mdchiefsfan** · 10-30-2013, 05:32 AM

Oh, and he's 1 and done like 8 of his 12 appearances

**Bearcat** · 10-30-2013, 05:46 AM

Wait, so we've now come to the conclusion that the best all around teams have the best shot at winning in the playoffs?

Crazy talk.

Mr. Plow · 10-30-2013, 07:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat

Wait, so we've now come to the conclusion that the best all around teams have the best shot at winning in the playoffs?

Crazy talk.

Stupid theory.

Sandy Vagina · 10-30-2013, 07:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JF08

Alex Smith rankings:

DYAR: 17th
DVOA: 17th
QBR: 18th

*I'd post the link, but CP has yet to allow me to do so. Ridiculous... (Got these from Football Outsiders.

As most of the Smith backers have said, he's been playing at a mid-tier level. The stats back up that statement. He hasn't needed to press for more because the defense has allowed him to play conservatively. Statistically, Smith has generally had better stats when playing from behind, as his conservative style of play does not lend itself to "fantasy football" type stats. But it does lend itself to wins...

Good post that shouldn't be overlooked. Yes, the KC offense... for all the crying here about it.. is currently ranked 16th in the league for efficiency. Not a number to strut around with extreme pride.. but it sure isn't the dumpster-fire that folks here are pouting about.

**dannybcaitlyn** · 10-30-2013, 08:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mac-NinersChiefs

Good post that shouldn't be overlooked. Yes, the KC offense... for all the crying here about it.. is currently ranked 16th in the league for efficiency. Not a number to strut around with extreme pride.. but it sure isn't the dumpster-fire that folks here are pouting about.

I believe the fans are frustrated because there are many times this year the offense could have put the nail in the coffin during some games but were unable to capitalize on the opportunity.

**Bearcat** · 10-30-2013, 08:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Plow

Stupid theory.

Anyone who's ever wanted a franchise quarterback knows eleventy championships are guaranteed when you have a quarterback who throws for 6000 yards, even if your defense gives up 30 points per game.

It's either that or have a really good defense with no offense.

There's no point in discussing any other options, because they simply don't exist.

02-27-2013, 12:45 PM
Hammock Parties I'll be back. Join Date: Nov 2002 Casino cash: $4440478	Alex Smith did, does, and will always suck. Last edited by Hammock Parties; 03-02-2013 at 09:39 PM..
Posts: 278,648

10-30-2013, 05:32 AM	#7855
mdchiefsfan Supporter Join Date: Dec 2009 Casino cash: $3293904	Oh, and he's 1 and done like 8 of his 12 appearances __________________ 2017 Adopt-A-Chief:TYREEK HILL
Posts: 10,760

10-30-2013, 05:46 AM	#7856
Bearcat Would an idiot do that? Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Arizona Casino cash: $2544931	Wait, so we've now come to the conclusion that the best all around teams have the best shot at winning in the playoffs? Crazy talk. __________________
Posts: 55,635