The other board seems dead, who is responsible?

[Ozarks-Chiefs-Fan]

Hello Moderators,

I agree, can you edit the title of this post and rename it "Welcome to the ChiefsPlanet.com Bulletin Board?

As the originator, I feel that renaming would do wonders for the posts.

Thanks
------------------
Nuc'em all and let those who remain sort them out!

[This message has been edited by r8er_h8er (edited 09-27-2000).]

[KCWolfman]

Help! I'm lost in the verbage and can't find my way out! [img]http://www.ChiefsPlanet.com/ubb/tongue.gif[/img]

[Hoover]

Can't we all just get a longneck?

[QBKirk]

Russ, Luzap, Kilgore, et al,

How can I respond for being responsbile for gangrene, infulenza, and feces?

Could I possibly form a tangital thought having a limited mind that possess' jealousy, vindictiveness, dishonesty, and the lack of intellectual discourse.

If I have no common passion about the Chiefs because I am overbearing, lack tolerance, or abridge anyone's freedom of thought because of my pessimism then why should I attempt to scale this stack of cards that have been marked against myself?

I guess I'll just have to watch the Chiefs play the Broncos tomorrow at Mile High for the 32nd time in my short, nefarious lifetime as a rebel to find the answers...

Cal - You misinterpret. I have not blamed you for any of the mentioned afflictions.

You attempted to credit a board run with less than honorable tactics for the creation of this board.

While I agree that Chiefsplanet.com would not exist without the other board - they deserve no credit for anything other than running a great portion of their advertising dollars off to greener (and ironically - ad free) pastures.

A good many things are created, discovered, or invented because of horrible circumstances. One does not thank the negative circumstances for the creation of postive aspects/.

[QBKirk]

Russ,

Both boards have their share of problems and to berate those who choose to participate on either site is of no measurable value.

Chiefsplanet has its own moderators to filter undesirable comments from members it deems unworthy to post. The KC BB has a moderator(s) that does the same thing but appeared to become oppressive towards a select few who became enraged and fled to this site.

I can comprehend the validity of having your thoughts censored and electing to find a more suitable forum to continue your discourses on politics, religion, and the exploits of the Chiefs. What I cannot understand are the opinions from the majority of the "regulars" who applaud themselves for making their cyber existence more enjoyable, yet find a sense of satisfaction from categorizing the remaining KC BB members, who were not subjected to the dictatorship, as less than desirable in their allegiance to the Chiefs.<P>

[kc hopeful]

Not exactly sure where I fit in this cyber pissing contest. I started posting on the other BB quite a while back and have enjoyed it. I don't really consider myself one of "you" or one of "them". I missed the incident that spawned the mass exodus but I am familiar with the story. I am really confused how and why the dispute between posters and the BB administrator has evolved into an argument between our fellow Chiefs fans. I continue to read and post on both but see a little something missing on each board. The split has IMHO followed philosophical lines. There is not as much diversity of thought as their once was. A one sided debate is not very interesting. Oh well I think I've broken enough wind for now so GO CHIEFS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[This message has been edited by RCGChief (edited 09-24-2000).]

[One Arrowhead Dave]

This is kinda sad.

In less than four hours, our beloved Chiefs take on a conference rival in enemy territory. Because of the schedules of both teams, our playoff hopes hinge pretty much on this battle. We also face a determination as to whether or not our coaching staff is really as bad as we fear. Not to mention the hooting we would have to endure from the more obnoxious Broncos Homers who visit these shores.

And what is the hottest topic on the BB?

xoxo~
gaz
disappointed.<BR>

[Truman in KC]

thanx gaz,,i think some need to get a life,,
lets talk football

[CASHMAN]

Rod, Same here...I agree completely...Joe



------------------
"life is good"

[QBKirk]

Gaz,

If my math serves me correct and my vision is 20/20 it looks like....

"The other board appears....." (CP) 83

"Chiefsplanet talking smack..."(KCBB) 75

And you point was again?

[Duck Dog]

Let me join my voice to those of disappointment.

I have taken rather a cavalier attitude toward this Topic because it, and what it represents, are nonsensical. Personally, I could care less if persons somewhere in cyber space want to categorize the bb I frequent most with some kind of generalized label.

It has been my perception that many people spend their lives looking for things to be offended by. If myself and others choose to change our cyber habits it is not a personal insult to any one person. If we choose to discuss our reasoning (be it imperfect, irrational, or not even fully understood) there is no reason for anyone else to take offense.

Like minded individuals tend to spend time with each other. To act like this is some insulting kind of revelation is juvenile.

There are those on both BBs that want to make this into some grand revolutionary stand for principals and justice (and for some, perhaps it is ~ I just found it an opportune time to ‘hang out’ with a bunch of people whom I respect), but for many others it is nothing more than the ebb and flow of the market place. I believe it is the castigation of those that choose to be insulted that supports a lack of diversity on both BBs.

Although I will say that I have seen very little bashing on this bb of the other bb, it is somewhat insulting to me (as a moderator) to be accused of censoring people. To accuse any moderator here of that demonstrates a distinct lack of knowledge ~ commonly known as ignorance.

I will, however, work to ignore such transgressions and encourage all to post here regardless of common sense [img]http://www.ChiefsPlanet.com/ubb/biggrin.gif[/img]

Luz
Valuing diversity… <BR>

[One Arrowhead Dave]

Injun-

I’m sorry, I don’t understand what you mean in #84.

Splain me, please.

xoxo~
gaz
confused.<BR>

[Yosef_Malkovitch]

Cal Injun:

For me, the only thing that I find puzzling in the post you made is that you seem to be taken aback that anyone would answer your post in a contradictory manner. You come onto this BB, chastise us with the phrase:

"I was going to shake everyones hands, cyber style, about the success of Chiefsplanet but was unable to grasp them as they were too busy slapping each others backs."

and then expect us all to cower in embarassment at your revelation. If i was to go and post that same chastisement I would elicit the same response from those who post there.

There is nothing different in the personalities that make up kc.com BB and cheifsplanet that would set one above the other. To insinuate that those of us who post here are "elitists", and that's exactly what your response inferred, is incorrect.

mmaddog
**************

------------------
"When you're not the lead dog in the pack, the view is always the same"

[One Arrowhead Dave]

Injun-

Looking at the only post I have made in this thread today, I assume that #84 was not actually intended for me.

xoxo~
gaz
collateral damage victim.<BR>

[QBKirk]

Gaz,

It was in reference to your post where you talked about today's game and then added the final sentence about "what is the hottest topic on the other BB"?

But we both know that a thread is never 100% dedicated to the subject matter so high numbers are a misnomer.

I posted "over there" that it was an attempt by the Chiefs organization to deflect attention to the unveiling of those Disco Red pants at Mile High today.

Methinks it will suspend, indefinitely, our Super Bowl aspirations until these hideous things run their losing course.

At least the newbies will now experience what the late 70s and 80s were like....