Dorsey: There is no definite first round QB

[RunKC]

No clear quarterback choice for Chiefs in the draft
By ADAM TEICHER
Kansas City Star
Published Saturday, Feb. 16, 2013, at 3:36 p.m.
0 CommentsEmailPrintReprints
Pros and cons
Matt Barkley, 6-2, 230, USC: Superb leadership skills, the first one at practice or meetings and the last one to leave. But his arm strength is suspect. May be a system fit.

Mike Glennon, 6-7, 220, North Carolina State: Strong arm. He’s easily able to make all the necessary throws. But a lack of mobility could be a problem against a strong pass rush.

Ryan Nassib, 6-2, 225, Syracuse: Good mobility and throws well on the run. But he’s a late-bloomer who might need more seasoning before he’s ready for the NFL.

Geno Smith, 6-3, 210, West Virginia: Has best ability of all the top prospects. Was durable in college, but he’s not an imposing specimen. So how will he hold up in the NFL?

Tyler Wilson, 6-2, 220, Arkansas: Will stand in and take a hit but still make an accurate throw. But he’s short for an ideal NFL quarterback and has small hands, which could lead to fumbling problems.

KANSAS CITY, Mo. — The Chiefs spent the last several days setting their draft board in preparation for this week’s NFL Scouting Combine in Indianapolis. The process merely confirmed for new general manager John Dorsey that when it comes to quarterbacks, their homework is only starting.

Opinions on the top available quarterbacks in this year’s draft are that varied.

“There is no quarterback where personnel guys can definitely say, ‘He’s a first-round pick,’ ” Dorsey said. “There were so many inconsistencies in the collective group. There was not one guy that stood up and said, ‘I’m the guy in the position this year.’ There really wasn’t one clear-cut guy.

“There are too many technical flaws, scheme flaws. There are so many different variables that there are a lot of people all over the place on naming the top four or five guys and who those guys would be.”

The Chiefs aren’t the only team having trouble sorting through the top quarterback prospects. From the natural ability of West Virginia’s Geno Smith to the smooth leadership skills of USC’s Matt Barkley to the willingness to take a hit in the face of a strong pass rush of Arkansas’ Tyler Wilson, there are plenty of things to like.

There are reasons to pause just the same. Smith faltered late last fall against better competition. Barkley and Wilson had disappointing, injury-marred senior seasons.

This is a particular problem for teams like the Chiefs, who have a gaping need at quarterback. Dorsey didn’t say so specifically, but he didn’t sound like the Chiefs were planning to take a quarterback with the first pick in this year’s draft.

More likely, the Chiefs will select a quarterback later in the draft — if they take one at all.

Dorsey said both he and coach Andy Reid would be in attendance at the workouts of most, if not all, of the top available quarterbacks.

“I think Andy is a really good evaluator of quarterbacks,” Dorsey said. “I want him and I to go to as many quarterback workouts as possible and actually set our own up.”

The quarterback rankings for last year’s draft were determined almost a year in advance. Stanford’s Andrew Luck was a consensus choice to be the top player selected as soon as the 2011 draft was finished. Baylor’s Robert Griffin III came on as a senior to win the Heisman Trophy and make the race interesting, but in the end, Luck was selected first by Indianapolis. Griffin was taken with the next pick by Washington.

“Last year was an easy evaluation,” draft analyst Mel Kiper said. “Automatically, you put Andrew Luck and RG III up there.”

This year, quarterback ratings are scattered. Some teams like Smith, but others have different favorites, like Barkley, Wilson, North Carolina State’s Mike Glennon or Syracuse’s Ryan Nassib.

“The year didn’t go the way Barkley and the USC Trojans hoped,” Kiper said. “He began the year number one on my big board. You saw what happened with USC. They lost four games with Barkley at quarterback and lost a couple more when he was hurt. They didn’t have a signature win all year. They dropped down the rankings from number one and he dropped down the rankings from number one.

“Geno Smith started out great. It looked like after Barkley struggled you could lock Geno Smith in. Then he has a disappointing second half of the season, so there are issues in terms of what type of starting quarterback he can be. Glennon was hot for a while even though he had a subpar supporting cast, and he didn’t play great (in the bowl game) against Vanderbilt and didn’t have a wow-you-over Senior Bowl week.

“Things didn’t fall into place at Arkansas, and that affected Tyler Wilson. The wheels came off for all the quarterbacks at some point (last) year. Things just didn’t fall right to allow them to maximize their ability. That’s why the teams are right now in the predicament they are, trying to figure this whole quarterback thing out and not overdraft or push a guy up when he’s not deserving.”

Kiper doesn’t have a quarterback rated among his top 25 players. In fact, in his latest mock draft, Kiper doesn’t have a single quarterback being selected in the first round.

“It’s just a tough evaluation, trying to figure out which quarterbacks in this draft, if any, will be great starting quarterbacks,” he said.

Dorsey said he expects at least two quarterbacks to be drafted in the first round because so many teams have a need. It’s a matter, though, of which ones.

Things could solidify in the next couple of months. The draft doesn’t begin until April 25. Meanwhile, the combine begins this week, followed by pro days on college campuses and then individual workouts.

To Dorsey, at least, personal interviews might be the most important part of the postseason draft process. He said a quarterback can improve his draft standing with a series of strong interviews.

“The most impressive interview I’ve ever had in the last 25 years of doing this? Russell Wilson,” said Dorsey, referring to the quarterback drafted by Seattle last year in the third round. “Wasn’t even close. You could feel that guy as a person, how strong he was, how intellectually deep he was, how mentally tough he was, that he had the charisma to lead other players. I always try to look at kids like I’m in the locker room and I’m a teammate. It was easy to see this guy leading a team.

“A quarterback wants to come across in the interview process as confident, as having a vast understanding and knowledge of defenses, as being capable of leading a group of men. That’s what you’ve got to convey to the teams. On film, his physical traits and skills will come out. But you have to over the next few weeks impress on teams the character of his soul, his ability to lead a franchise.”

Read more here: http://www.kansas.com/2013/02/16/267...#storylink=cpy

[Messier]

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC

You dont know anyone that wants to be mediocre? JFC do you live under a rock? Everyone in the KC metro area is hiding under a rock hoping we dont select a QB...

The whole ****ing city wants nothing more than 9-7 and a LT or RG in the draft...

Dont ****ing sugar coat it... IF this GM cant ****ing see that it takes a QB in the modern day NFL, then the SOC needs to ramp back up and ask for a replacement.

You dont win drafting some clownfish from South Carolina. You win by drafting a QB. Its not ****ing rocket surgery. Its basic common sense.

Well the coach specializes in QBs, the GM was a top scout for a team that continually took QBs no matter if they already had one or not. I'm gonna go with they know the importance of QBs.

[RealSNR]

Originally Posted by Nightfyre

I was just watching some Foles snap-by-snaps from 2011. That really reinforced why I hated him as a prospect. Sure he has an above average arm. He uses inconsistent footwork and sprays the ball all over the place. He never works a progression. Geno is ten times the prospect Foles was.

Let's see... Foles was the 88th pick overall. If Geno is ten times better, would we calculate his appropriate value by dividing 88 by 10?

That's 8.8, which is close to what a lot of people have Geno ranked. And clearly good enough for the #1 overall pick if you're a QB, especially in a putrid class of non QBs such as this.

[RealSNR]

Originally Posted by milkman

Rocket surgery?

[munkey]

Originally Posted by SNR

Let's see... Foles was the 88th pick overall. If Geno is ten times better, would we calculate his appropriate value by dividing 88 by 10?

That's 8.8, which is close to what a lot of people have Geno ranked. And clearly good enough for the #1 overall pick if you're a QB, especially in a putrid class of non QBs such as this.

Remove your lips from Geno's cock...it's getting really old. How do you know Geno is ten times better than Foles? Apples and Oranges...you really can't compare other than one has actually taken a snap in the NFL...

[RealSNR]

Originally Posted by munkey

Remove your lips from Geno's cock...it's getting really old. How do you know Geno is ten times better than Foles? Apples and Oranges...you really can't compare other than one has actually taken a snap in the NFL...

. <- The point







You

[Rudy tossed tigger's salad]

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

Ponder is still a developing QB, and we don't have to construct an artificial ceiling for him just yet, as many mistakenly did with Flacco.

He's garbage. Under ten yards per completion. Something Matt Cassel hasn't even managed to do.

There are checkdown Kings, and then there is Christian Ponder

[Coogs]

Originally Posted by RunKC

There may not be a QB that is a franchise player either.

If Dorsey thinks that and doesn't like a QB in the first round, this board will immediately turn on him and call him Scott ***** though.

Which is ****ing reeruned.

I'll be disappointed. I want the best QB. I don't care if Andrew Luck is not in this draft. I want the best one from it. I want a front office that can identify that QB... and draft him.

We have the 1st pick. Not the 5th. Not the 10th. Not the 17th. The 1st. No excueses.

If they gamble in any way, shape, or form in trying to trade down and miss on the QB, I am going to be pissed. And if they think all the QB's are going to last until later in the first round and try and trade back up, and we miss out on the best QB, I am going to be pissed.

And by miss out, I am talking about some other team taking a QB before us, and that QB turning out to be the real thing. So it may take a year or two, but at that point I will be pissed big time becuse we have the 1st pick. No damn excuse to miss out on a QB this time around. None!

[Messier]

I'll be disappointed if they don't take a QB with one of their first 3 picks, but I can't get on board with the idea of just taking your favorite QB first, regardless of where you have him slotted. They may like Smith or Barkley the best, but still have them at a second round grade. They may never feel there's a QB in this draft that will be a franchise QB. I can't tell them they're wrong, and by the draft they'll have done more research than anyone on CP. I hope they find a QB they love, but it appears they haven't yet.

[B14ckmon]

Originally Posted by Rudy Was Offsides.

He's garbage. Under ten yards per completion. Something Matt Cassel hasn't even managed to do.

There are checkdown Kings, and then there is Christian Ponder

Ironically, Geno had like a higher percent of scrimmage/screen passes than Wilson, Barkley, or Glennon.

[NJChiefsFan]

Originally Posted by B14ckmon

Ironically, Geno had like a higher percent of scrimmage/screen passes than Wilson, Barkley, or Glennon.

Those are different. Brady throws a lot of short passes but you can't just compare Matt and his 10 passes from inside 10 yards statistically. Matt is dumping off because he can't read anything and panics. Meanwhile Brady is slicing up a defense methodically. Different intentions and much different results. Different situation with Geno vs. Matt but it is still a different scenario. One had designed plays, the other panic plays.

[SAUTO]

Originally Posted by mr. tegu

Someone please help me and tell what the big fuss is about?

He said Wilson was an impressive interview and praised him which means he takes stock in the interviews. He then said that they were going to go to as many work outs for QBs as possible to set their own board.

How is this construed as a bad thing? It sounds promising to me, because, you know they have already looked at QBs and even with that they are STILL going to continue looking at them.

Actually he said they want to go to as many workouts as possible, him and Reid, and set up more workouts themselves.
Posted via Mobile Device

[King_Chief_Fan]

Originally Posted by mr. tegu

Someone please help me and tell what the big fuss is about?

He said Wilson was an impressive interview and praised him which means he takes stock in the interviews. He then said that they were going to go to as many work outs for QBs as possible to set their own board.

How is this construed as a bad thing? It sounds promising to me, because, you know they have already looked at QBs and even with that they are STILL going to continue looking at them.

that makes 2 of us

[OrtonsPiercedTaint]

We like to just stand there and bleed.

[Chiefshrink]

and what Mr. Dorsey "really feels about this QB class" remains to be seen

[Messier]

I was reading the story as it was picked up by CBS, and it ticked me off that they included Teichers opinion that they might not take a QB at all in the draft. Dorsey didn't say that, its all Teicher.