I believe all you Huard haters have some crow to eat - Page 7

Hammock Parties · 09-17-2006, 05:17 PM

Told you he was a gamer!

Hammock Parties · 09-17-2006, 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief

We held the opponent to 6 points in regulation and lost. Clearly the offense i nthe form that we saw in Denver doesn't work.

Yes, I'd rather see Croyle in the game. He's no more likely to fumble than Huard, and is a hell of a lot more likely to actually make a play?

Can it get any worse than what Huard did for us? Are you worried that we'll only be held to 3 or 0 points?

I'm worried that Croyle will turn it over 4 times a game. He's a rookie.

I think Denver would have eaten Croyle alive today. Huard was poised.

jspchief · 09-17-2006, 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie

lmao @ jsp calling for Croyle, or anyone for that matter...

WE WENT TO DENVER AND LOST IN OVERTIME, OVERTIME, TO THE TEAM WHO WAS RUNNER UP IN THE AFC LAST YEAR. AND WE DIDN'T HAVE OUR GOD DAMN PRO BOWL QB...

God some of you are just...dumb.

We held our opponent to 6 points in regulation and lost the game.

The defense sure as fuck didn't lose it for us.

jspchief · 09-17-2006, 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs

I'm worried that Croyle will turn it over 4 times a game. He's a rookie.

I think Denver would have eaten Croyle alive today. Huard was poised.

So what do we have to lose? 6 points per game?

runnercyclist · 09-17-2006, 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs

What a joke! The first one was all on LJ! Huard fumbled the other one after catching it. Honestly, if you were expecting a backup QB starting his first game in ages to not fumble, you were expecting too much.

Huard played well enough for us to win. Maybe if Solari hadn't called a ****ing run with 50 seconds left, we'd be celebrating right now.

Rookie OC, 2nd year starter at RB, ML, WR, back up QB, 1st year HC...lots of reasons to begin the season sputtering a bit. We need a couple of soft teams to gain some confidence and what the heck here they come!

Let's worry if we lay a turd in those two games.

**Rausch** · 09-17-2006, 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs

Also, Greg Wesley had an EXCELLENT game. All you Wesley Haters can

!

Great point.

You should have started a thread about that...

Ultra Peanut · 09-17-2006, 07:47 PM

Quote:

not throw INT's, not force anything

On the, what, five passes he threw downfield all game? He sure as hell "forced" that glorious catch and fumble of his that sapped all of the momentum we'd been building and took it from a potential two-score game to what was eventually a 3-point game.

Quote:

not lose the game

Way to do something a high school quarterback should have the sense to avoid doing and giving the ball to the opponent one play after your biggest passing play of the game, Damon!

Quote:

manage the game...

Boy howdy, I sure do love those delay of game penalties and wasted timeouts!

Again, I don't think it was a bad performance, by his standards, today. I don't think it's time to throw Croyle to the wolves just yet, either. But anyone suggesting Huard put forth some sort of valiant effort out there needs to lay off the crack.

Hammock Parties · 09-17-2006, 07:48 PM

Huard gives us a chance to win.

Croyle doesn't.

People are forgetting that Denver has one of the best defenses in this league. Just because we only produced 6 points today doesn't mean we can't score 30 next week with Huard at the helm.

**dirk digler** · 09-17-2006, 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief

We held the opponent to 6 points in regulation and lost. Clearly the offense i nthe form that we saw in Denver doesn't work.

Yes, I'd rather see Croyle in the game. He's no more likely to fumble than Huard, and is a hell of a lot more likely to actually make a play?

Can it get any worse than what Huard did for us? Are you worried that we'll only be held to 3 or 0 points?

The only problem with Croyle is that I don't know if he could hold up physically. He needs 1 good year of weight lifting and training to build up his body.

Hootie · 09-17-2006, 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief

We held our opponent to 6 points in regulation and lost the game.

The defense sure as fuck didn't lose it for us.

Of course the defense didn't lose it for us. Neither did Huard. In fact, there really in no one to blame. We had the perfect gameplan, but we were simply overmatched without Green. It's that simple.

Take this gameplan, insert Green week 5...

Here it is:

Run, run, run, short pass, run, run, run, short pass, run, short pass, PLAY-ACTION...

When Green gets back, we use Marty-ball and suddenly Green becomes the best PA QB in the league.

We get down, we go back to our Saunders offense.

But for now, our best chance is Marty-ball, even when Green returns. We have the better team than Denver.

Ultra Peanut · 09-17-2006, 07:49 PM

Quote:

People are forgetting that Denver has one of the best defenses in this league. Just because we only produced 6 points today doesn't mean we can't score 30 next week with Huard at the helm.

I guarantee you we won't score 30 next week.

Hammock Parties · 09-17-2006, 07:50 PM

I meant against the 49ers. I predict we'll score AT LEAST 21 points.

Hootie · 09-17-2006, 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ultra Peanut

On the, what, five passes he threw downfield all game? He sure as hell "forced" that glorious catch and fumble of his that sapped all of the momentum we'd been building and took it from a potential two-score game to what was eventually a 3-point game.

Way to do something a high school quarterback should have the sense to avoid doing and giving the ball to the opponent one play after your biggest passing play of the game, Damon!

Boy howdy, I sure do love those delay of game penalties and wasted timeouts!

Again, I don't think it was a bad performance, by his standards, today. I don't think it's time to throw Croyle to the wolves just yet, either. But anyone suggesting Huard put forth some sort of valiant effort out there needs to lay off the crack.

What the **** were you expecting? I'll tell you what I was expecting...a sack fest (Mmmm), full of INT's and stupid decisions.

Instead we had an INTELLIGENT backup with less than average skills put us in position to win the game.

He made ONE mistake, albeit a big one, but still, I feel a WHOLE lot better about our backup QB situation now.

Hootie · 09-17-2006, 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ultra Peanut

I guarantee you we won't score 30 next week.

I'll bet you a hundred dollars we don't score any!

09-17-2006, 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie

What the **** were you expecting? I'll tell you what I was expecting...a sack fest (Mmmm), full of INT's and stupid decisions.

Instead we had an INTELLIGENT backup with less than average skills put us in position to win the game.

He made ONE mistake, albeit a big one, but still, I feel a WHOLE lot better about our backup QB situation now.

Hootie gets it.

I never expected to make that post.

Logical · 09-17-2006, 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie

Not take sacks, not throw INT's, not force anything, not lose the game, stay within the gameplan, manage the game...

anything else?

Don't do anything that might remotely win the game all better be in your list of his accomplishments.

09-17-2006, 05:17 PM
Hammock Parties I'll be back. Join Date: Nov 2002 Casino cash: $4150478	I believe all you Huard haters have some crow to eat Told you he was a gamer!
Posts: 279,776

09-17-2006, 07:48 PM	#97
Hammock Parties I'll be back. Join Date: Nov 2002 Casino cash: $4150478	Huard gives us a chance to win. Croyle doesn't. People are forgetting that Denver has one of the best defenses in this league. Just because we only produced 6 points today doesn't mean we can't score 30 next week with Huard at the helm. __________________ Chiefs game films
Posts: 279,776

09-17-2006, 07:50 PM	#101
Hammock Parties I'll be back. Join Date: Nov 2002 Casino cash: $4150478	I meant against the 49ers. I predict we'll score AT LEAST 21 points. __________________ Chiefs game films
Posts: 279,776