People blaming Cassel for this loss are clearly maladjusted freaks.

[yhf]

For Christs sake, blame the coaches, blame the refs, blame the defense.

Do NOT blame Matt Cassel. He provided a winning effort.

C/ATT YDS AVG TD INT RATING
M. Cassel 20/29 201 6.9 3 0 122.9

Anyone that asks for more production, is, a dumb****.

Don't get me wrong, I doubt the shit out of Cassel, but his performance in this game was extremely encouraging. Any purported Chiefs fan that wasn't impressed and pleased by his play should just... get a ****ing grip.

[Hootie]

Originally Posted by johnny961

Look at Brady's total stats for the year 2007 before you start rambling. Dude threw for an astronomical number of yards that year. http://www.nfl.com/players/tombrady/...e?id=BRA371156

and a lot of them were from YAC you dickhole

JFC

[Hootie]

Originally Posted by mcaj22

I'm not here to side yes or no if Cassel is to blame, but to counter the OP's numbers argument

Texans
Week 1 - 433 yards 3 touchdowns (Peyton)
Week 2 - 426 yards 1 touchdown (McNabb)
Week 3 - 284 yards 2 touchdowns (Romo)
Week 4 - 278 yards 2 touchdowns (Gradkowski)
Week 5 - 297 yards 3 touchdowns (Eli)
Week 6 - 201 yards 3 touchdowns (Cassel)


Now if you use this as a measuring stick, (which you should, because it's the ****ing 31st ranked PASS DEFENSE in the ENTIRE LEAGUE) then that means the numbers a skewed to make even bad players look good.

Cassel falls somewhere around and or under the Bruce Gradkowski/Tony Romo range and I think the consensus around here is those guys stink, so I'm sure a similar case can be made for Cassel.

I'm not saying to blame him for the loss, but I'm saying his numbers are far under what the Texans have given up against other QBs and I'm not sure if his numbers are skewed because the play calling has him on such a short leash (compared to all the other QBs the Texans have faced that pretty much have free reign to be a gunslinger) or he is really that bad. But either way, it paints him in a very serviceable light when you see how a range of 5 (good and bad) QBs have also done against the Texans this season.

cool dickhead

now post all of those teams and the amount of rushing yards they had against Houston

go go go

YOU GUYS ARE ALL ****ING MORONS

[johnny961]

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon

then Tom Brady was a terrible QB in 2007

JFC

some people are so dense

it's sickening

Didn't finish my rant. Look at Brady's stats for 2007. Comparing Brady to Cassel is assinine.

[Rasputin]

Is Cassel the guy you want in the playoffs? That's the question that begs to be asked. I don't think he can get us past the next level in the playoffs when it really counts. Super Bowl be damned with this guy. We have tools to be a good team this year but next year we should be primed for contintion to be serious continders and still have QB issues. I want us to draft a QB for the prospect of being a continder year in and year out for the long hall. Cassel is just another rehash QB that will show flashes at times then backpedle other times. He had a good outing against a piss poor passing defense, good for him. He is showing improvement fine, I'm not going to crown his ass unless he wins big in the playoffs damn it.

This team has a ways to go. Our schedule gets easier from here and will help us, but lets not get over hyped eather for that. We got to win our games out right, and we can't count on the rest of the division to lose every game. I'm looking forward to a solid season of improvement & take over the division but more than that isn't in this years plans I'm afraid. Next year watch out. Still asking for a QB that we draft and mold into a gem at QB. Yea more growing pains i'm sure, but the reward will be so sweet if we do it right. The team can carry a young QB like it is carrying a 28 yo back up this year. Cassel didn't win us this game at the end. I'm not blaming him for the loss but he didn't win it for us.

[johnny961]

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon

and a lot of them were from YAC you dickhole

JFC

So an insult is the best comeback you can muster?

[Hootie]

Originally Posted by johnny961

Didn't finish my rant. Look at Brady's stats for 2007. Comparing Brady to Cassel is assinine.

Agreed.

Taking yards away from Cassel because Bowe made a play is also asinine...

see my point yet?

[mcaj22]

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon

cool dickhead

now post all of those teams and the amount of rushing yards they had against Houston

go go go

YOU GUYS ARE ALL ****ING MORONS

If you can ****ing read I clearly stated in the post about some of the QBs having free reign to gunsling, which means they just pass and don't rely on the run game.

But apparently you are too ****ing stupid to take that point into consideration which totally negates your post about rushing yards.

I get that those teams aren't going to run on the Texans, which brings up the argument of Cassel being on a shorter leash compared to....dare I say....

other real NFL QBs, which those numbers in the passing game support.

[Shogun]

The Kansas City Chiefs are to blame for the loss. Everybody Happy?

Win as a team, Lose as a team.

[Hootie]

why would we pass the ball all over the place when we scored 31 ****ing points using the running game and scored on 4 straight ****ing possessions???

Seriously...

how reeruned can this fan base get to bash Cassel and the offense after this game???

Seriously?

OMG

You guys are...

****ING

STUPID

[FAX]

It's interesting how differently people can perceive the same game. I was just thinking about that first drive ... how many 4th down conversions in that drive?

I mean, if Haley hadn't made the decision to go for it on 4th down both times (and, of course, had we not benefited from the PI call on 4th and 2 at the 17 - an incomplete pass), we would have attempted a field goal ... not scored the first TD. Our next three series end in punts ... meanwhile, the Texans score and we're down by 4, at least ... not tied.

In a lot of ways, for the Chiefs, this game was a bit of an aberration and, hopefully, a valuable learning experience.

FAX

[Just Passin' By]

Originally Posted by mcaj22

If you can ****ing read I clearly stated in the post about some of the QBs having free reign to gunsling, which means they just pass and don't rely on the run game.

But apparently you are too ****ing stupid to take that point into consideration which totally negates your post about rushing yards.

I get that those teams aren't going to run on the Texans, which brings up the argument of Cassel being on a shorter leash compared to....dare I say....

other real NFL QBs, which those numbers in the passing game support.

The Chiefs are a running and short/medium pass team, and the team was playing that way for pretty much the entire game. The offense did as it was designed to. Your argument ignores that, which is why pointing to those other teams' numbers doesn't really make a lot of sense.

[KCSupersized]

Originally Posted by Shogun

The Kansas City Chiefs are to blame for the loss. Everybody Happy?

Win as a team, Lose as a team.

FTW

[Oh Snap]

Given that this game was against the 32nd ranked pass D, which is giving up well over 300 passing yards per game...somehow I am unimpressed with the mediocre performance Cassel put up...

This was his game to "Break out" if you will...he didnt do that. And he sure as hell didnt come through like we needed him to...In the end though, this game was lost because our defense decided to take a sunday off. Scoring 31 points for this offense should be more than enough.

[Hootie]

statboy geeks who don't know what they watch

that's all it is

and i'm done for the night on this dumbass site filled with dumbass fans

[Shogun]

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon

statboy geeks who don't know what they watch

that's all it is

and i'm done for the night on this dumbass site filled with dumbass fans

I resent that.