I believe all you Huard haters have some crow to eat - Page 8

Hammock Parties · 09-17-2006, 05:17 PM

Told you he was a gamer!

**Rausch** · 09-17-2006, 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs

Huard gives us a chance to win.

Croyle doesn't.

Based on what?

You have no sample size for reference.

Nothing to back that up...

Ultra Peanut · 09-17-2006, 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie

What the **** were you expecting? I'll tell you what I was expecting...a sack fest (Mmmm), full of INT's and stupid decisions.

Instead we had an INTELLIGENT backup with less than average skills put us in position to win the game.

He made ONE mistake, albeit a big one, but still, I feel a WHOLE lot better about our backup QB situation now.

I was expecting a semi-competent QB that relied heavily on LJ to move the ball down the field.

I got a semi-competent QB that relied heavily on LJ to move the ball down the field.

Just because he didn't single-handedly lose the game doesn't mean "Huard haters" have any crow to eat. He still sucks, as "good" (or rather, "not horrific") as his performance may have been today.

Hootie · 09-17-2006, 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Logical

Don't do anything that might remotely win the game all better be in your list of his accomplishments.

dude goes 11-12 in the first half (12-12 if Tony G doesn't drop the ball) and you know, Denver has a good defense, they made some adjustments, but, it's not like Solari really opened up that playbook for him. It was quite evident we were running the ball first down, second down, and sometimes even third down. That was our gameplan. Our gameplan was the RIGHT gameplan for this week against that team. We'd win this game 6 times out of 10 using the same personnel and the same gameplan...we just got a few bad breaks.

Our backup QB is a whole lot better than I gave him credit for, and he'll get a raise from SOMEONE to be a backup next year if he keeps this up.

**Rausch** · 09-17-2006, 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ultra Peanut

I was expecting a semi-competent QB that relied heavily on LJ to move the ball down the field.

I got a semi-competent QB that relied heavily on LJ to move the ball down the field.

Just because he didn't single-handedly lose the game doesn't mean "Huard haters" have any crow to eat. He still sucks, as "good" (or rather, "not horrific") as his performance may have been today.

Perfectly stated...

Hootie · 09-17-2006, 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ultra Peanut

I was expecting a semi-competent QB that relied heavily on LJ to move the ball down the field.

I got a semi-competent QB that relied heavily on LJ to move the ball down the field.

Just because he didn't single-handedly lose the game doesn't mean "Huard haters" have any crow to eat. He still sucks, as "good" (or rather, "not horrific") as his performance may have been today.

We all know Huard isn't Peyton Manning, Eli Manning, even Cooper Manning...at the end of the day he is what he is, a backup QB...but he's a hell of a backup QB. Some backup QB's are starting QB's, if that makes sense. Take Schaub. Huard isn't a starting QB, he'll never be a starting QB, but he plays within himself...if you're counting on Huard to win us games than that's your problem. Defense aside, Huard was the brightest spot about this week. Now Solari knows what he's working with, maybe we can open the playbook up a little bit against SF week 4. Play-action passes would be nice, Denver had 18 guys in the box.

Hammock Parties · 09-17-2006, 07:59 PM

Also, for all his haters, Kendrell Bell played OK today. Six tackles and made some plays in the running game.

But PLEASE don't let him cover anyone.

JBucc · 09-17-2006, 07:59 PM

I wonder what Bill Nye thinks about all this

Oh well that settles this.

ROYC75 · 09-17-2006, 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs

Told you he was a gamer!

Really, Rich Gannon made a career out of dink and dunk offense and some runs thrown in there.

Hootie · 09-17-2006, 08:00 PM

you know what!? I was wrong...wrong all along. We should've went out and acquired Joey Harrington this offseason. THAT WAY, when Trent goes down, we could've had a big armed QB that throws 4 picks a game...but at least he "throws the ball downfield!" HELL YES!

Hootie · 09-17-2006, 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs

Also, for all his haters, Kendrell Bell played OK today. Six tackles and made some plays in the running game.

But PLEASE don't let him cover anyone.

I saw him on the ground an awful lot. Doesn't shed blockers very well, that's for sure.

jspchief · 09-17-2006, 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie

you know what!? I was wrong...wrong all along. We should've went out and acquired Joey Harrington this offseason. THAT WAY, when Trent goes down, we could've had a big armed QB that throws 4 picks a game...but at least he "throws the ball downfield!" HELL YES!

Much better to complete 80% of your 4 yard passes, score 6 points, and lose.

Chiefnj · 09-17-2006, 08:04 PM

**** Huard and the ultraconservative playcalling. He's god-damned veteran QB who has been with the team a few years. He's supposed to be able to throw the ball downfield to receivers. He's not a damn rookie. He wasn't brought onto the team last week. People excuse him because he's a backup, but it's just an excuse. Decent backup QB's with a weeks preparation can throw the ball better than Huard and not restrict the playbook as much as with him.

htismaqe · 09-17-2006, 08:07 PM

The debacle right before halftime was 100% Huard's fault.

Inexcusable, especially for a 10-year vet.

milkman · 09-17-2006, 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs

Also, for all his haters, Kendrell Bell played OK today. Six tackles and made some plays in the running game.

But PLEASE don't let him cover anyone.

Kendrell Bell needs to find a spot on the bench and make it his own, so that we can get a guy with some speed who might actually make a real play on the field.

**dirk digler** · 09-17-2006, 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe

The debacle right before halftime was 100% Huard's fault.

Inexcusable, especially for a 10-year vet.

I agree. The problems with the time outs for this game is inexcusable but with Trent in as QB I think that will resolve itself. Trent is the leader when he is on the field and he is pretty good at taking care of that stuff.

09-17-2006, 05:17 PM
Hammock Parties I'll be back. Join Date: Nov 2002 Casino cash: $4140478	I believe all you Huard haters have some crow to eat Told you he was a gamer!
Posts: 279,790

09-17-2006, 07:59 PM	#111
Hammock Parties I'll be back. Join Date: Nov 2002 Casino cash: $4140478	Also, for all his haters, Kendrell Bell played OK today. Six tackles and made some plays in the running game. But PLEASE don't let him cover anyone. __________________ Chiefs game films
Posts: 279,790

09-17-2006, 07:59 PM	#112
JBucc MVP Join Date: Oct 2005 Casino cash: $10004952	I wonder what Bill Nye thinks about all this Oh well that settles this.
Posts: 12,016

09-17-2006, 08:00 PM	#114
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	you know what!? I was wrong...wrong all along. We should've went out and acquired Joey Harrington this offseason. THAT WAY, when Trent goes down, we could've had a big armed QB that throws 4 picks a game...but at least he "throws the ball downfield!" HELL YES!
Posts: 56,356

09-17-2006, 08:04 PM	#117
Chiefnj MVP Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Willis, Harris and Davis. Casino cash: $10004900	**** Huard and the ultraconservative playcalling. He's god-damned veteran QB who has been with the team a few years. He's supposed to be able to throw the ball downfield to receivers. He's not a damn rookie. He wasn't brought onto the team last week. People excuse him because he's a backup, but it's just an excuse. Decent backup QB's with a weeks preparation can throw the ball better than Huard and not restrict the playbook as much as with him. __________________ "I always tell (the assistant coaches), 'Make it simple, 'cause I'm stupid,'" Edwards said. "This ain't computer football." Herm Edwards, 3-20-07 Q: Herm, back on December 25th you were asked if Trent Green was your starter going into next season and you said, ‘yeah, why wouldn’t he be?’ Have you changed your mind on that? EDWARDS: No, I have not.” (1-11-07)
Posts: 6,811

09-17-2006, 08:07 PM	#118
htismaqe 'Tis my eye! Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Chiefsplanet Casino cash: $10269900	The debacle right before halftime was 100% Huard's fault. Inexcusable, especially for a 10-year vet.
Posts: 100,022