Hear ye, hear ye! The great treason trial has begun! - Page 8

**Rain Man** · 11-01-2006, 04:49 PM

The Defendant: Mecca

The Judicial Team

Presiding Judge: Rain Man
Chief Legal Clerk: trndobrd
Assistant Legal Clerk: banyon
Chief Bailiff: frazod
Assistant Bailiff: slag02
Court reporter and commentator: Greg63
Court reporter and commentator: SPChief
Courtroom artist: stevieray

Prosecution Team:

Donger - Lead Prosecutor
Hootie - Assistant Prosecutor
GoChiefs - Prosecuting Paralegal

Defense Team:

Redrum_69 - Lead Defender
JBucc, Logical, SNR, JohnnyV13 - Dream Team Legal Defense Team

The jury:

Adept Havelock
JimNasium
Delano
scott free
On the Warpath58
PastorMikH
Chieficus
AZChiefFan
NJChieffan
Metrolike
mmaddog
unlurking

The charges:

Charge 1. Treason in the first degree for predicting a poor season for the Chiefs.

Charge 2. Treason in the first degree for citing that the Geathers hit on Trent Green was innocent and non-fineworthy.

Charge 3. Treason in the first degree for citing that the Rolle face mask was not an act of evil visited upon a Chief by an opposing player.

Charge 4. (Remanded to lower court - no longer applicable.)

Charge 5. General mayhem.

Here is the process. In order to grant the defendant the right to a speedy trial, we will employ a shortened nine-step process.

Step 1. The prosecution and defense will make their opening statements. We will hear from the lead prosecutor and defender and any assistant prosecutors or defenders who wish to speak as well.

Step 2. The prosecution will make its case. They may call any witnesses needed and present any evidence. At this time, the jury may ask questions for clarification purposes only. (This is an enlightened courtroom.)

Step 3. The defense will make its case, and may cross-examine any prosecution witnesses. At this time, the jury may ask questions for clarification purposes only.

Step 4. The prosecution may make a rebuttal, and may cross-examine any defense witnesses. At this time, the jury may ask questions for clarification purposes only.

Step 5. The prosecution will make their closing statement.

Step 6. The defense will make their closing statement.

Step 7. Jury deliberations.

Step 8. The reading of the verdict.

Step 9. If the defendant is guilty of any charges, the court will provide the sentencing.

The trial begins now, with opening statements by legal counsel.

(Banging gavel)

Mecca · 11-01-2006, 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs

OBJECTION!!! My witness is NOT ON TRIAL! Accusing him of perjury is most upsetting!

Ron Jaworki's own personal statements and medical records prove it to be a lie......maybe he should watch what he says before saying it.

11-01-2006, 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

You are paid by ESPN to be an anaylst correct?

Correct.

Quote:

To basically just give your opinion about things, but you are one of the bottom rung guys seeing as you never make it to sportscenter or sunday countdown......you get stuck on matchup and ESPNEWS is this correct?

That's also correct, but it's by choice. Michael Irvin's brain has been eaten by cocaine.

Hammock Parties · 11-01-2006, 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

Ron Jaworki's own personal statements and medical records prove it to be a lie......maybe he should watch what he says before saying it.

OBJECTION! This is hearsay! Ron Jaworski is not here today!

Frazod · 11-01-2006, 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs

OBJECTION!!! My witness is NOT ON TRIAL! Accusing him of perjury is most upsetting!

Mecca · 11-01-2006, 08:29 PM

Uh huh be it as it may you are on the lower rungs of the totem pole up in Bristol. So let us take a look ESPN doesn't feel the need to make you a top guy....for whatever reason it may be. And you've already made the statement that you felt the play was a cheapshot.

The question is, did the play/offending player deserved to be fined....a simple yes or no will suffice.

**Rain Man** · 11-01-2006, 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

Ron Jaworki's own personal statements and medical records prove it to be a lie......maybe he should watch what he says before saying it.

The court requests that the defense and/or prosecution provide a link regarding Mr. Jaworski's medical concussion history.

11-01-2006, 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

The question is, did the play/offending player deserved to be fined....a simple yes or no will suffice.

Yes.

**Rain Man** · 11-01-2006, 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

Uh huh be it as it may you are on the lower rungs of the totem pole up in Bristol. So let us take a look ESPN doesn't feel the need to make you a top guy....for whatever reason it may be. And you've already made the statement that you felt the play was a cheapshot.

The question is, did the play/offending player deserved to be fined....a simple yes or no will suffice.

Just to clarify, is the defense speaking of the Green/Geathers incident, or an event pertaining to Mr. Jaworski or Mr. Hoge?

Mecca · 11-01-2006, 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man

Just to clarify, is the defense speaking of the Green/Geathers incident, or an event pertaining to Mr. Jaworski or Mr. Hoge?

Speaking of Green/Geathers.....

So you feel that Geathers deserved to be fined.....Did not the NFL governing body rule that it was a legal play and not impose a fine?

OldTownChief · 11-01-2006, 08:35 PM

Hoge has been a strong witness for the prosecution, I've made up my mind.

**Rain Man** · 11-01-2006, 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

Speaking of Green/Geathers.....

So you feel that Geathers deserved to be fined.....Did not the NFL governing body rule that it was a legal play and not impose a fine?

The answer, Mr. Hoge?

PinkFloyd · 11-01-2006, 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man

Just to clarify, is the defense speaking of the Green/Geathers incident, or an event pertaining to Mr. Jaworski or Mr. Hoge?

I must be in the wrong court room... I was looking for the OJ trial...

11-01-2006, 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

So you feel that Geathers deserved to be fined.....Did not the NFL governing body rule that it was a legal play and not impose a fine?

Sure, but they've been wrong before.

**Rain Man** · 11-01-2006, 08:38 PM

The question must be answered by Mr. Hoge, not by the prosecution team.

**Rain Man** · 11-01-2006, 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pinkfloyd

I must be in the wrong court room... I was looking for the OJ trial...

Three courtrooms down, and 12 years back.

11-01-2006, 04:49 PM
Rain Man Seize life. Be an ermine. Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: My house Casino cash: $-462449 VARSITY	Hear ye, hear ye! The great treason trial has begun! The Defendant: Mecca The Judicial Team Presiding Judge: Rain Man Chief Legal Clerk: trndobrd Assistant Legal Clerk: banyon Chief Bailiff: frazod Assistant Bailiff: slag02 Court reporter and commentator: Greg63 Court reporter and commentator: SPChief Courtroom artist: stevieray Prosecution Team: Donger - Lead Prosecutor Hootie - Assistant Prosecutor GoChiefs - Prosecuting Paralegal Defense Team: Redrum_69 - Lead Defender JBucc, Logical, SNR, JohnnyV13 - Dream Team Legal Defense Team The jury: Adept Havelock JimNasium Delano scott free On the Warpath58 PastorMikH Chieficus AZChiefFan NJChieffan Metrolike mmaddog unlurking The charges: Charge 1. Treason in the first degree for predicting a poor season for the Chiefs. Charge 2. Treason in the first degree for citing that the Geathers hit on Trent Green was innocent and non-fineworthy. Charge 3. Treason in the first degree for citing that the Rolle face mask was not an act of evil visited upon a Chief by an opposing player. Charge 4. (Remanded to lower court - no longer applicable.) Charge 5. General mayhem. Here is the process. In order to grant the defendant the right to a speedy trial, we will employ a shortened nine-step process. Step 1. The prosecution and defense will make their opening statements. We will hear from the lead prosecutor and defender and any assistant prosecutors or defenders who wish to speak as well. Step 2. The prosecution will make its case. They may call any witnesses needed and present any evidence. At this time, the jury may ask questions for clarification purposes only. (This is an enlightened courtroom.) Step 3. The defense will make its case, and may cross-examine any prosecution witnesses. At this time, the jury may ask questions for clarification purposes only. Step 4. The prosecution may make a rebuttal, and may cross-examine any defense witnesses. At this time, the jury may ask questions for clarification purposes only. Step 5. The prosecution will make their closing statement. Step 6. The defense will make their closing statement. Step 7. Jury deliberations. Step 8. The reading of the verdict. Step 9. If the defendant is guilty of any charges, the court will provide the sentencing. The trial begins now, with opening statements by legal counsel. (Banging gavel)
Posts: 145,256

11-01-2006, 08:29 PM	#110
Mecca Hockey Town Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Kansas City, Missouri Casino cash: $-502950	Uh huh be it as it may you are on the lower rungs of the totem pole up in Bristol. So let us take a look ESPN doesn't feel the need to make you a top guy....for whatever reason it may be. And you've already made the statement that you felt the play was a cheapshot. The question is, did the play/offending player deserved to be fined....a simple yes or no will suffice.
Posts: 115,252

11-01-2006, 08:35 PM	#115
OldTownChief Bobble Taco Join Date: May 2004 Casino cash: $10004900	Hoge has been a strong witness for the prosecution, I've made up my mind.
Posts: 5,362

11-01-2006, 08:38 PM	#119
Rain Man Seize life. Be an ermine. Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: My house Casino cash: $-462449 VARSITY	The question must be answered by Mr. Hoge, not by the prosecution team. __________________ Active fan of the greatest team in NFL history.
Posts: 145,256