Croyle deserves the Roethlisberger treatment - Page 8

'Hamas' Jenkins · 09-30-2007, 10:09 PM

And no, I don't mean breaking his face on someone's bumper.

I still think that this team will do more to help itself in the long run if Brodie is our starter.

I think that most of us are willing to admit that our two weak links on offense today were Kyle Turley and Huard. Huard made ok decisions for the most part, but he still checked down too much, IMO, and he made some really poor throws. Turley got his bitch ass yanked, and for the future of the franchise, hopefully Huard's time is soon.

Croyle will make mistakes, but Huard isn't exactly giving us Montana-like precision either. We have two options in the passing game, which is perfect for a young QB. If he can't find D-Bowe or Tony, he can check down, and his arm and legs allow us to do things we can't with Huard.

If we can let Brodie be a game-managing QB this year (which is essentially what Huard is), then we might be able to be competitive for several years.

**BigMeatballDave** · 10-01-2007, 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GOATSE

I don't believe we'd be 2-2 with Brodie.

I agree. I say 3-1.

**DaneMcCloud** · 10-01-2007, 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefDave

Did you really mean to type this shit? You're a tool...

You're an asswipe.

Thanks for picking and choosing the quotes.

Moron.

**DaneMcCloud** · 10-01-2007, 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry

You honsetly think Damon Friggin Huard could have led us to a Super Bowl.

Did I state that?

NO.

What the fuck is wrong with you people?

Stating that Croyle was clearly not ready to lead the Chiefs into the 2007 season due to his poor preseason performance is NOT the same as saying that Damon Huard is anything near a Pro-Bowl, Super Bowl Quarterback.

Got it?

ChiefsCountry · 10-01-2007, 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Did I state that?

NO.

What the fuck is wrong with you people?

Stating that Croyle was clearly not ready to lead the Chiefs into the 2007 season due to his poor preseason performance is NOT the same as saying that Damon Huard is anything near a Pro-Bowl, Super Bowl Quarterback.

Got it?

I wasnt talking about Croyle, go look at the post that I quoted that from.

headsnap · 10-01-2007, 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Did I state that?

NO.

What the fuck is wrong with you people?

yup, you pretty much implied that:

Quote:

In 2006, they had a SHOT at winning. The head coach started the wrong QB (similar to the head coach in 1997). The defense played extremely well.

**DaneMcCloud** · 10-01-2007, 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry

I wasnt talking about Croyle, go look at the post that I quoted that from.

Cool. But still, the question remains:

Why is it that by stating Croyle wasn't ready to start the 2007 season is automatically to be interpreted as Damon Huard is a great QB?

Is that those people can't read? Won't read? Or that they're just plain fucking stupid?

**DaneMcCloud** · 10-01-2007, 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by headsnap

yup, you pretty much implied that:

Really? Then you're just friggin' DUMB.

'Hamas' Jenkins · 10-01-2007, 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Really? Then you're just friggin' DUMB.

The only dumb one, is the sonofabitch who thinks that having a SHOT equates to being competitive for a title.

I have a shot to fuck Scarlett Johannsen. It's probably 1 in 500 or so million, but it doesn't mean that I'm in a competition to be her next bedmate.

**DaneMcCloud** · 10-01-2007, 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

The only dumb one, is the sonofabitch who thinks that having a SHOT equates to being competitive for a title.

I have a shot to fuck Scarlett Johannsen. It's probably 1 in 500 or so million, but it doesn't mean that I'm in a competition to be her next bedmate.

Give me a break. Friggin' A, Hamas. I thought you were smarter than this.

I don't think there was ANYONE on this forum last September that thought the Chiefs would even be competitive after the loss of Willie Roaf on opening day and Trent Green in game one.

But guess what? THAT'S WHY THEY PLAY THE GAME.

If you're so damn certain this team is going nowhere and won't amount to anything, why bother watching or attending the games? Why waste your time as a fan?

THAT to me is a dumb sonofabitch.

PS - I think you're over-estimating your chances with Scarlett Jo

Chiefnj2 · 10-01-2007, 02:45 PM

Croyle doesn't "deserve" anything. If he didn't melt down in preseason he'd "deserve" a shot. Right now, Herm needs to make up his mind.

headsnap · 10-01-2007, 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Really? Then you're just friggin' DUMB.

that was YOUR quote dumbass!!!!

I'm going to go DL some new music...

'Hamas' Jenkins · 10-01-2007, 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Give me a break. Friggin' A, Hamas. I thought you were smarter than this.

I don't think there was ANYONE on this forum last September that thought the Chiefs would even be competitive after the loss of Willie Roaf on opening day and Trent Green in game one.

But guess what? THAT'S WHY THEY PLAY THE GAME.

If you're so damn certain this team is going nowhere and won't amount to anything, why bother watching or attending the games? Why waste your time as a fan?

THAT to me is a dumb sonofabitch.

PS - I think you're over-estimating your chances with Scarlett Jo

So I should just be a fairweather fan and only watch whenever we are winning...

Is your Colts Starter jacket restricted airflow to your brain??

**DaneMcCloud** · 10-01-2007, 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by headsnap

that was YOUR quote dumbass!!!!

I'm going to go DL some new music...

Explain to me how stating that the Chiefs would have had a better shot at winning in Indy circa 2006 with Damon Huard at quarterback is the same as saying "The Chiefs would have won the Super Bowl with Huard at QB"?

I guess you're a reerun. That *might* explain your reading comprehension.

But maybe not.

**DaneMcCloud** · 10-01-2007, 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

So I should just be a fairweather fan and only watch whenever we are winning...

Is your Colts Starter jacket restricted airflow to your brain??

I never thought I'd say this to Mr. Hamas Jenkins, the self-proclaimed genius of Chiefsplanet.

Your and idiot.

Thanks for playing.

headsnap · 10-01-2007, 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Explain to me how stating that the Chiefs would have had a better shot at winning in Indy circa 2006 with Damon Huard at quarterback is the same as saying "The Chiefs would have won the Super Bowl with Huard at QB"?

I guess you're a reerun. That *might* explain your reading comprehension.

But maybe not.

Retart, nobody said ANYTHING on this thread about the Chiefs winning the 06 SB with Huard...

why don't YOU try a little reading comprehension.

09-30-2007, 10:09 PM
'Hamas' Jenkins Now you've pissed me off! Join Date: Jan 2006 Casino cash: $7279572	Croyle deserves the Roethlisberger treatment And no, I don't mean breaking his face on someone's bumper. I still think that this team will do more to help itself in the long run if Brodie is our starter. I think that most of us are willing to admit that our two weak links on offense today were Kyle Turley and Huard. Huard made ok decisions for the most part, but he still checked down too much, IMO, and he made some really poor throws. Turley got his bitch ass yanked, and for the future of the franchise, hopefully Huard's time is soon. Croyle will make mistakes, but Huard isn't exactly giving us Montana-like precision either. We have two options in the passing game, which is perfect for a young QB. If he can't find D-Bowe or Tony, he can check down, and his arm and legs allow us to do things we can't with Huard. If we can let Brodie be a game-managing QB this year (which is essentially what Huard is), then we might be able to be competitive for several years.
Posts: 75,077

10-01-2007, 02:45 PM	#115
Chiefnj2 In Search of a Life Join Date: Mar 2007 Casino cash: $6674388	Croyle doesn't "deserve" anything. If he didn't melt down in preseason he'd "deserve" a shot. Right now, Herm needs to make up his mind. __________________ Mismanaging the clock.
Posts: 22,540