Home Discord Chat
Go Back   ChiefsPlanet > Nzoner's Game Room
Register FAQDonate Members List Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-20-2009, 04:35 AM  
T-post Tom T-post Tom is offline
Threepeat!
 
T-post Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Milk/Honey/Gazland
Casino cash: $4287293
And with the #3 pick the KC Chiefs take... B.J. Raji

Raji would make a lot of sense considering true 3-4 NTs are difficult to find.

Riser: Boston College's Raji a big man in draft class

Posted: March 19, 2009
War Room scouts
Sporting News


More than 20 teams spent quality time with Boston College defensive lineman B.J. Raji at the NFL Scouting Combine, and apparently that wasn't enough to satisfy their craving for the best nose tackle in the 2009 draft.

No wonder Raji is seen as a riser in April's draft. Offseason auditions including the Senior Bowl, Combine and on-campus workouts have yet to expose any skeletons in Raji's closet -- except those he collected while ransacking B.C. opponents.


War Room scouts join in the praise for Raji, a 6-1, 330-pound monster who would fit in the middle of many NFL defenses. That's why in their latest mock draft, scouts project Raji as the third overall pick, going to the Kansas City Chiefs.

Here's what they say about Raji: "The Chiefs debate between LB Aaron Curry and Raji. But to make the switch to a 3-4 defense, finding a nose tackle is much more important than a linebacker."

The Denver Broncos are scheduled to meet with Raji on Friday at Boston College. The Detroit Lions played host to Raji this week. And with the Broncos and quarterback Jay Cutler at odds, these meetings could add smoke to rumors of a Cutler-to-Lions deal.

War Room scouts still project Georgia quarterback Matthew Stafford as the first player taken -- by the Lions, if they keep the pick, or the Broncos if they trade Cutler to get it.

Denver's first pick for now is No. 12, so Raji will be long gone by the time the Broncos make that selection.

Lions coach Jim Schwartz told Detroit reporters his team was doing its due diligence in meeting this week with Raji and Oklahoma State's Brandon Pettigrew, the top tight end in this draft class.

Raji is viewed as a rock on the defensive line, able to hold his ground against running plays. He also has the quickness to be an effective pass rusher.

He was academically ineligible for the 2007 season but made up for that in 2008. He bolstered his stock with an outstanding week at the Senior Bowl.

It appears he put the year off to good use. Raji told Scout.com that he made some of his biggest strides in performance during his senior year because of the progress he made in understanding the mental aspects of playing his position.

"I understood the game a lot more than I did in previous years," Raji said. "I better understood how I was going to be attacked, at pre-snap I was able to get some good reads, whether it was going to be a double-team or how a player was going to block me. So that helped me choose what moves to use."

War Room Scouts' latest mock draft is available online, with two full rounds of picks and analysis. Visit SN's Pro Football War Room for information and analysis on more than 400 draft prospects. Also, pick up a copy of Sporting News' 2009 Draft Guide, available online or at retailers.

This week's Top 10 picks

1. Detroit Lions
Matt Stafford, QB, Georgia
2. St. Louis Rams
Eugene Monroe, T, Virginia
3. Kansas City Chiefs
B.J. Raji, NT, Boston College
4. Seattle Seahawks
Aaron Curry, OLB, Wake Forest
5. Cleveland Browns
Brian Orakpo, DE/OLB, Texas
6. Cincinnati Bengals
Jason Smith, T, Baylor
7. Oakland Raiders
Michael Crabtree, WR, Texas Tech
8. Jacksonville Jaguars
Darrius Heyward-Bey, WR, Maryland
9. Green Bay Packers
Everette Brown, DE/OLB, Florida State
10. San Francisco 49ers
Rey Maualuga, MLB, Southern Cal
Posts: 20,371
T-post Tom is obviously part of the inner Circle.T-post Tom is obviously part of the inner Circle.T-post Tom is obviously part of the inner Circle.T-post Tom is obviously part of the inner Circle.T-post Tom is obviously part of the inner Circle.T-post Tom is obviously part of the inner Circle.T-post Tom is obviously part of the inner Circle.T-post Tom is obviously part of the inner Circle.T-post Tom is obviously part of the inner Circle.T-post Tom is obviously part of the inner Circle.T-post Tom is obviously part of the inner Circle.
    Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2009, 03:05 PM   #106
htismaqe htismaqe is offline
'Tis my eye!
 
htismaqe's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Chiefsplanet
Casino cash: $10269900
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amnorix View Post
So you think you're more likely to get a good NG at 63 than 3.

Yeah, I can't agree. Sorry.
No, that's ok.

And for the record, a more accurate representation would be that you're more likely to get a good NT at #23 than #3.

My thoughts on defensive tackles, especially free agent ones, are pretty well-known around here. And for the most part, they've been born out on the field.
Posts: 100,022
htismaqe is obviously part of the inner Circle.htismaqe is obviously part of the inner Circle.htismaqe is obviously part of the inner Circle.htismaqe is obviously part of the inner Circle.htismaqe is obviously part of the inner Circle.htismaqe is obviously part of the inner Circle.htismaqe is obviously part of the inner Circle.htismaqe is obviously part of the inner Circle.htismaqe is obviously part of the inner Circle.htismaqe is obviously part of the inner Circle.htismaqe is obviously part of the inner Circle.
    Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2009, 03:09 PM   #107
Amnorix Amnorix is offline
In BB I trust
 
Amnorix's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2003
Location: Boston, Mass.
Casino cash: $10029808
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe View Post
No, that's ok.

And for the record, a more accurate representation would be that you're more likely to get a good NT at #23 than #3.

My thoughts on defensive tackles, especially free agent ones, are pretty well-known around here. And for the most part, they've been born out on the field.

Ok, I guess. I don't know what your thoughts are, and won't ask you to repeat them here, but your thoughts are very, very odd.

Is there a sweet spot for other positions too? Are 6th round punters better than 4th round punters? Are 3rd round ILBs better than 2nds?


Posts: 43,125
Amnorix is obviously part of the inner Circle.Amnorix is obviously part of the inner Circle.Amnorix is obviously part of the inner Circle.Amnorix is obviously part of the inner Circle.Amnorix is obviously part of the inner Circle.Amnorix is obviously part of the inner Circle.Amnorix is obviously part of the inner Circle.Amnorix is obviously part of the inner Circle.Amnorix is obviously part of the inner Circle.Amnorix is obviously part of the inner Circle.Amnorix is obviously part of the inner Circle.
    Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2009, 03:12 PM   #108
htismaqe htismaqe is offline
'Tis my eye!
 
htismaqe's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Chiefsplanet
Casino cash: $10269900
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amnorix View Post
Ok, I guess. I don't know what your thoughts are, and won't ask you to repeat them here, but your thoughts are very, very odd.

Is there a sweet spot for other positions too? Are 6th round punters better than 4th round punters? Are 3rd round ILBs better than 2nds?


I see where you're coming from, and it does sound strange.

But for what it's worth, it's FAR more about where NOT to get a DT than it is where to get them.
Posts: 100,022
htismaqe is obviously part of the inner Circle.htismaqe is obviously part of the inner Circle.htismaqe is obviously part of the inner Circle.htismaqe is obviously part of the inner Circle.htismaqe is obviously part of the inner Circle.htismaqe is obviously part of the inner Circle.htismaqe is obviously part of the inner Circle.htismaqe is obviously part of the inner Circle.htismaqe is obviously part of the inner Circle.htismaqe is obviously part of the inner Circle.htismaqe is obviously part of the inner Circle.
    Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2009, 03:18 PM   #109
Amnorix Amnorix is offline
In BB I trust
 
Amnorix's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2003
Location: Boston, Mass.
Casino cash: $10029808
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe View Post
I see where you're coming from, and it does sound strange.

But for what it's worth, it's FAR more about where NOT to get a DT than it is where to get them.
I think what you have is a statistical anomaly (lack of success of top 5 selected DTs) based on a very small sample size.

Look, Richard Seymour was selected SIXTH. One pick out of your top 5 box, and he's worked out great. He's really a 4-3 DT / 3-4 DE, but in no way is he an edge pass rusher type.

I really doubt that if we had had the #3 pick that year, and we took him with that pick, he would suck for us.
Posts: 43,125
Amnorix is obviously part of the inner Circle.Amnorix is obviously part of the inner Circle.Amnorix is obviously part of the inner Circle.Amnorix is obviously part of the inner Circle.Amnorix is obviously part of the inner Circle.Amnorix is obviously part of the inner Circle.Amnorix is obviously part of the inner Circle.Amnorix is obviously part of the inner Circle.Amnorix is obviously part of the inner Circle.Amnorix is obviously part of the inner Circle.Amnorix is obviously part of the inner Circle.
    Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2009, 03:21 PM   #110
ncCHIEFfan ncCHIEFfan is offline
Starter
 

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Winston Salem, NC
Casino cash: $8412075
I would luv to have Raji on the team but man it sucks to have to draft another D lineman on the first day. I hope our draft picks will start producing.
Posts: 568
ncCHIEFfan is the dumbass Milkman is always talking aboutncCHIEFfan is the dumbass Milkman is always talking aboutncCHIEFfan is the dumbass Milkman is always talking aboutncCHIEFfan is the dumbass Milkman is always talking aboutncCHIEFfan is the dumbass Milkman is always talking aboutncCHIEFfan is the dumbass Milkman is always talking aboutncCHIEFfan is the dumbass Milkman is always talking aboutncCHIEFfan is the dumbass Milkman is always talking aboutncCHIEFfan is the dumbass Milkman is always talking aboutncCHIEFfan is the dumbass Milkman is always talking aboutncCHIEFfan is the dumbass Milkman is always talking about
    Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2009, 03:22 PM   #111
htismaqe htismaqe is offline
'Tis my eye!
 
htismaqe's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Chiefsplanet
Casino cash: $10269900
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amnorix View Post
I think what you have is a statistical anomaly (lack of success of top 5 selected DTs) based on a very small sample size.

Look, Richard Seymour was selected SIXTH. One pick out of your top 5 box, and he's worked out great. He's really a 4-3 DT / 3-4 DE, but in no way is he an edge pass rusher type.

I really doubt that if we had had the #3 pick that year, and we took him with that pick, he would suck for us.
That would depend on his mental makeup, because I'm inclined that work ethic is the biggest part of the problem. I also think the amount of money these guys get without ever playing a down has something to do with it to.

Richard Seymour just isn't the guy I'm talking about. He's a completely different kind of player.

As for the small sample size, it isn't small at all if you include free agent defensive tackles. The two are definitely related. The guys that are EXPECTED to be premier defensive tackles almost never pan out.
Posts: 100,022
htismaqe is obviously part of the inner Circle.htismaqe is obviously part of the inner Circle.htismaqe is obviously part of the inner Circle.htismaqe is obviously part of the inner Circle.htismaqe is obviously part of the inner Circle.htismaqe is obviously part of the inner Circle.htismaqe is obviously part of the inner Circle.htismaqe is obviously part of the inner Circle.htismaqe is obviously part of the inner Circle.htismaqe is obviously part of the inner Circle.htismaqe is obviously part of the inner Circle.
    Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2009, 03:22 PM   #112
ncCHIEFfan ncCHIEFfan is offline
Starter
 

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Winston Salem, NC
Casino cash: $8412075
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amnorix View Post
I think what you have is a statistical anomaly (lack of success of top 5 selected DTs) based on a very small sample size.

Look, Richard Seymour was selected SIXTH. One pick out of your top 5 box, and he's worked out great. He's really a 4-3 DT / 3-4 DE, but in no way is he an edge pass rusher type.

I really doubt that if we had had the #3 pick that year, and we took him with that pick, he would suck for us.
Coaching makes a big difference
Posts: 568
ncCHIEFfan is the dumbass Milkman is always talking aboutncCHIEFfan is the dumbass Milkman is always talking aboutncCHIEFfan is the dumbass Milkman is always talking aboutncCHIEFfan is the dumbass Milkman is always talking aboutncCHIEFfan is the dumbass Milkman is always talking aboutncCHIEFfan is the dumbass Milkman is always talking aboutncCHIEFfan is the dumbass Milkman is always talking aboutncCHIEFfan is the dumbass Milkman is always talking aboutncCHIEFfan is the dumbass Milkman is always talking aboutncCHIEFfan is the dumbass Milkman is always talking aboutncCHIEFfan is the dumbass Milkman is always talking about
    Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2009, 12:11 PM   #113
milkman milkman is offline
Dumbass!
 
milkman's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Leading the Marty bashing
Casino cash: $10029395
Quote:
Originally Posted by wazimo View Post
How about we draft Raji and trade Dorsey to Gunther for their 20th overall and possibly their 3rd rounder? Detroit are in need of a DT after losing Rogers and that guy to GB. We could then possibly move up to take Oher as our RT, or stay at 20 for one of the many hybrid LB/DE's? I like Dorsey but not in the 3-4 (if we go to that scheme). Just a thought.
If a trade scenario with Detroit played out like that, I'd rather stay at 20 and just take Jamon Meredith.

That's probably a little high for him to most, But I like him as a RT prospect better than Eben Britton or William Beatty, but you could also stay at 20 and select either of those guys as well.

The fact is, trading up to 11 get Oher when you'd have three good prospects to pick from at 20 would be throwing away the other picks you have to give up to select at 11.
__________________
Posts: 70,769
milkman is obviously part of the inner Circle.milkman is obviously part of the inner Circle.milkman is obviously part of the inner Circle.milkman is obviously part of the inner Circle.milkman is obviously part of the inner Circle.milkman is obviously part of the inner Circle.milkman is obviously part of the inner Circle.milkman is obviously part of the inner Circle.milkman is obviously part of the inner Circle.milkman is obviously part of the inner Circle.milkman is obviously part of the inner Circle.
    Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:51 PM.


This is a test for a client's site.
Fort Worth Texas Process Servers
Covering Arlington, Fort Worth, Grand Prairie and surrounding communities.
Tarrant County, Texas and Johnson County, Texas.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.