Chiefs LT Eugene Monroe in round 1? Pioli-Haley-Groh-Albert-Monroe - Page 9

T-post Tom · 01:16 AM

Holy six degrees of separation Batman. So Charlie Casserly thinks the Chiefs are going with E. Monroe out of Virgina. I know some of you despise that idea, but I'm just repeating what he said. His theory on why Monroe makes sense:

1) Monroe has value at #3. Stud player. (Awesome Pro Day & Combine.)
2) Continuity as Albert/Monroe played together at UVA.
3) Albert/Monroe = bookends to to protect Cassel (& big $$ investment).
4) Pioli, Haley & Groh (HC at Virgina) all coached at Jets together. Groh loves Monroe. Pioli/Haley respect Groh's opinion & will listen.
5) Chiefs might be able to trade down a position or so and still get Monroe while picking up an extra pick(s).

My apologies in advance if this is a repost.

**DaneMcCloud** · 04-10-2009, 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree

Alberts-Waters-Niswanger-Goff-Andre Smith(330 + Lbs)

PhilFree

Hey, Dumbshit.

It's ALBERT.

Not Alberts.

Titty Meat · 04-10-2009, 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Bullshit.

Bullshit, bullshit, bullshit.

Do you EVER know what the **** you're talking about?

I'm guessing NO.

You must not be getting enough at the bath houses in Cali. Are you saying Groh moved Albert from LT to Guard cause Monroe sucked and he wanted to play him at left tackle for shits and giggles?

aturnis · 04-10-2009, 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

It does when someone is stupid enough to make that claim, and support moving him to bring in a guy that isn't appreciably better at the position.

No doubt, Clady was the best rookie last year.

Albert was easily the 2nd best, IMO.

Baker 3rd.

Bottom line: You don't waste the highest pick you've had in recent memory to move a kid with All-Pro potential, just to replace him with someone who isn't significantly better.

You, my friend, are the ****ing idiot. You should hurry up and shut your ****ing mouth. Quick. I said it. I never did though, support drafting a LT this year. Only playing devils advocate, if it were up to me, we would trade down, even for slightly less than fair value. If you want to call me stupid for that, go ahead.

Fact is, Clady proved to be the best ROOKIE LT. Will he be better than Albert next year? I personally don't think so, but that's not what we're talking about here, is it? After that, it all comes down to whether or not Albert was better than Long and Baker. Long? Probably, he seemed to get a lot of help, so I'd say he can't really be considered better than Albert.

Baker though, played half a season and only gave up one sack. Whether or not he was better than Albert last season is based solely on opinion. So I can't say that Albert was the 2nd best LT and neither can you.

**DaneMcCloud** · 04-10-2009, 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay

You must not be getting enough at the bath houses in Cali. Are you saying Groh moved Albert from LT to Guard cause Monroe sucked and he wanted to play him at left tackle for shits and giggles?

God, you're a dumb****. For someone who pretends to know what he's talking about, you don't know jackshit.

Albert was moved because he could move to guard; Monroe couldn't. Albert is more athletic and has better footwork than Monroe and Groh was wise to put his best offensive lineman on the field.

It would be absolutely ****ing moronic for the Chiefs to draft Monroe when they can draft a right tackle in round three or later.

**OnTheWarpath15** · 04-10-2009, 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

God, you're a dumb****. For someone who pretends to know what he's talking about, you don't know jackshit.

Albert was moved because he could move to guard; Monroe couldn't. Albert is more athletic and has better footwork than Monroe and Groh was wise to put his best offensive lineman on the field.

It would be absolutely ****ing moronic for the Chiefs to draft Monroe when they can draft a right tackle in round three or later.

I'm sure he's just playing devil's advocate.

aturnis · 04-10-2009, 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay

In College Monroe was a better LT than Albert. 2 stud tackles for a 14.5 million dollar QB would be good. Better then drafting Orakapo.

Who said Monroe was a better LT in college? Everything I've heard is to the contrary. Only reason Monroe played LT over Albert is b/c Albert could play other positions better than Monroe.

**DaneMcCloud** · 04-10-2009, 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis

You, my friend, are the ****ing idiot.

JFC.

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis

Baker though, played half a season and only gave up one sack. Whether or not he was better than Albert last season is based solely on opinion. So I can't say that Albert was the 2nd best LT and neither can you.

Baker was part of a very good offensive line that had a 1,500 yard rusher and a QB with a quick release. If I had a choice, I'd take Albert any day of the week over Baker.

aturnis · 04-10-2009, 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan

Bullshit. If we could get Raji and Brown in rd 1, they BOTH have the potential to be impact players.

How do you suggest we get BOTH those players?

Titty Meat · 04-10-2009, 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

God, you're a dumb****. For someone who pretends to know what he's talking about, you don't know jackshit.

Albert was moved because he could move to guard; Monroe couldn't. Albert is more athletic and has better footwork than Monroe and Groh was wise to put his best offensive lineman on the field.

It would be absolutely ****ing moronic for the Chiefs to draft Monroe when they can draft a right tackle in round three or later.

That's bullshit if Albert was better you'd play Albert at LT and Monroe at RT you ****wit. Instead of pretending to be a scout you should stick to what you do best and thats sucking cawk for money.

aturnis · 04-10-2009, 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

Drafting a guy and paying him LT money is ****ing reeruned when we already have someone on the roster who is, for all intents and purposes, the same age, and who has proven he can play the position at a very high level when the other hasn't.

This is the best argument made so far.

aturnis · 04-10-2009, 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan

This is the best argument so far (not surprising considering the source

).

I still don't like it. We need defense. Trade down.

Funny, I thought the best we could get for one of them is compensatory picks?

**OnTheWarpath15** · 04-10-2009, 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis

This is the best argument made so far.

It's the same argument that has been made by no less than 10 of us every time this dumbass suggestion of moving Albert comes up.

This isn't anything new.

aturnis · 04-10-2009, 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Baker was part of a very good offensive line that had a 1,500 yard rusher and a QB with a quick release. If I had a choice, I'd take Albert any day of the week over Baker.

Again, opinion.

**DaneMcCloud** · 04-10-2009, 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay

That's bullshit if Albert was better you'd play Albert at LT and Monroe at RT you ****wit. Instead of pretending to be a scout you should stick to what you do best and thats sucking cawk for money.

Go **** yourself yourself, you stupid ****ing ****.

Titty Meat · 04-10-2009, 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

It's the same argument that has been made by no less than 10 of us every time this dumbass suggestion of moving Albert comes up.

This isn't anything new.

What does Mrs.Warparth think about you sucking off guys on a message board? Wait nobody is stupid enough to marry your dumbass.

04-10-2009, 01:11 AM
T-post Tom Threepeat! Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Milk/Honey/Gazland Casino cash: $3547293	LT Eugene Monroe in round 1? Pioli-Haley-Groh-Albert-Monroe Holy six degrees of separation Batman. So Charlie Casserly thinks the Chiefs are going with E. Monroe out of Virgina. I know some of you despise that idea, but I'm just repeating what he said. His theory on why Monroe makes sense: 1) Monroe has value at #3. Stud player. (Awesome Pro Day & Combine.) 2) Continuity as Albert/Monroe played together at UVA. 3) Albert/Monroe = bookends to to protect Cassel (& big $$ investment). 4) Pioli, Haley & Groh (HC at Virgina) all coached at Jets together. Groh loves Monroe. Pioli/Haley respect Groh's opinion & will listen. 5) Chiefs might be able to trade down a position or so and still get Monroe while picking up an extra pick(s). My apologies in advance if this is a repost. Last edited by T-post Tom; 04-10-2009 at 01:16 AM..
Posts: 20,876