Gosselin 2011 Mock 2.0 AND 3.0 JUST ADDED - Post #38

[Fumblerooski]

Based on Team Needs.




Gosselin's 2nd Mock Draft:

1. Carolina: Cam Newton, QB, Auburn
2. Denver: Nick Fairley, DT, Auburn
3. Buffalo: Marcel Dareus, DT, Alabama
4. Cincinnati: Von Miller, OLB, Texas A
5. Arizona : A.J. Green, WR, Georgia
6. Cleveland : Julio Jones, WR, Alabama
7. San Francisco: Patrick Peterson, CB, LSU
8. Tennessee: Robert Quinn, DE, North Carolina
9. Cowboys: J.J. Watt, DE, Wisconsin
10. Washington: Prince Amukamara, CB, Nebraska
11. Houston: Cameron Jordan, DE, Cal
12. Minnesota: Blaine Gabbert, QB, Missouri
13. Detroit: Tyron Smith, OT, Southern Cal
14. St. Louis: Ryan Kerrigan, OLB, Purdue
15. Miami: Mike Pouncey, C, Florida
16. Jacksonville: Da’Quan Bowers, DE, Clemson
17. New England: Mark Ingram, HB, Alabama
18. San Diego : Anthony Castonzo, OT, Boston College
19. New York Giants: Nate Solder, OT, Colorado
20. Tampa Bay: Corey Liuget, DT, Illinois
21. Kansas City: Phil Taylor, NT, Baylor
22. Indianapolis: Aldon Smith, DE, Missouri
23. Philadelphia: Gabe Carimi, OT, Wisconsin
24. New Orleans: Marvin Austin, DT, North Carolina
25. Seattle : Derrick Sherrod, OT, Mississippi State
26. Baltimore: Cameron Heyward, DE, Ohio State
27. Atlanta: Kenrick Ellis, DT, Hampton
28. New England: Danny Watkins, G, Baylor
29. Chicago: Muhammad Wilkerson, DT, Temple
30. New York Jets: Brooks Reed, OLB, Arizona
31. Pittsburgh : Aaron Williams, CB, Texas
32. Green Bay: James Carpenter, OT, Alabama

[salame]

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724

He is one of the guys I would want Denver to draft in the second round if we end up picking a DT in the first.

I really really think it will be von miller or peterson
Elway seems like he wants to bring some zaz in
he is a zazzy guy
ZAZ

[BossChief]

Watch Baltimore draft either Clayborn or Ballard in the first and then Sash in the second.

[salame]

sash?

[salame]

dont you mean

[BossChief]

Pairing Sash with Reed would really help that secondary.

If the real draft falls like this mock, one would have to think they would be trying to move up to draft Prince, though after he gets into the late teens and then into the early 20s. Even if thats not normally their drafting strategy.
Their front seven is good enough to go another year and their defense would be well served to add a couple difference makers back there.

Add Prince and Sash to Baltimores existing defense....damn.

[keg in kc]

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724

Plus this draft doesn't have a whole lot of quality 4-3 LB's to choose from. I think Martez Wilson is one of the only 4-3 LB's who has a second round grade.

That's not a real good justification for taking one at 2. LB is more of a middle-round position, value wise.

I still say Fairley makes more sense. Nothing is more disruptive on an every-down basis than a tackle who can penetrate.

Which is no slam on Miller. As I've said, I just don't get the logic.

[BossChief]

you cant take a premier pass rushing prospect high enough or too high.

[salame]

Originally Posted by keg in kc

That's not a real good justification for taking one at 2. LB is more of a middle-round position, value wise.

I still say Fairley makes more sense. Nothing is more disruptive on an every-down basis than a tackle who can penetrate.

Which is no slam on Miller. As I've said, I just don't get the logic.

zazzy logic

[keg in kc]

Originally Posted by BossChief

you cant take a premier pass rushing prospect high enough or too high.

Which is to me another mark for Fairley. Who's more valueable to a 4-3, a player like Warren Sapp, or a player like any of the interchangeable outside rushers that 4-3 teams all have? I'd say the best and rarest pass rusher of all is the 4-3 undertackle.

Although maybe Denver's system will feature larger tackles who just hold blocks. Or maybe they think they have somebody there already to handle the undertackle. I won't pretend to know their roster.

I will say this much: I don't like seeing Von Miller there. But I'm much more glad (should this turn out to be the case) that I won't be seeing Fairley.

[Chiefs=Champions]

Originally Posted by Saccopoo

**** you. Watkins would be a substantially better NFL RT than Carimi, especially in this system. You people are idiots for falling in line after Rick "Nostradamus" Gosselin puts up his third mock.

I mean, Amukamara falling to #25? Eat more shrooms Rick.

Mm yer. A 27 year old projected guard is a better option to play RT. Arnt you the guy who wanted Brian Bulaga instead of Berry? Eat a dick you Idiot.

[MagicHef]

Originally Posted by keg in kc

That's not a real good justification for taking one at 2. LB is more of a middle-round position, value wise.

I still say Fairley makes more sense. Nothing is more disruptive on an every-down basis than a tackle who can penetrate.

Which is no slam on Miller. As I've said, I just don't get the logic.

Fairley just isn't as good of a player. You may disagree, but that is the consensus. Reaching for need is a very bad idea at the top of the first round, that's how you end up drafting Tyson Jackson.

[the Talking Can]

meh, oh well...still hope we trade down

the only positive is that saccofbats hates him (he's worse than knowmo now), which means he must be pretty good...


if we end up with some combo of hankerson/little/ellis/powe in the next 2 rounds I'd feel better...

[salame]

I'm sure they have some ****ing bargain basement receiver in mind

[MoreLemonPledge]

Originally Posted by salame

I'm sure they have some ****ing bargain basement receiver in mind

WE ALREADY HAVE KEVIN CURTIS THE ONE TESTICLED WONDER

[Crush]

Gunther will start looking like a competent DC if that happens.