MEDIA REACTIONS: Chiefs Early Draft Losers on NFLN

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by Messier

Every year, the teams with multiple first round picks are deemed winners. Wow. The insight is incredible.

Yep, I said it last night.

We were going to be hard pressed to "kill it" in this draft in most people's eyes when we were down picks, it's simple mathematics.

I think we did just fine with the resources we had at hand.

[dannybcaitlyn]

Espn guys gave us B-.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by dannybcaitlyn

Espn guys gave us B-.

They're delusional.

[ILChief]

I give them the grade I give every team after every draft: incomplete

[RealSNR]

LAWL SOME PEOPLE HAVE OPINIONS ON A FOOTBALL MESSAGE BOARD THAT'S FUNNY Y DONT' THEY BECOME GMS AND HEAD COACHES LAWL OH CHIEFS PLANET.

Worst part about the draft is listening to the dumb****s bash this place. The "board experts" are the reason this forum stays in place and has entertainment value. If it were up to ****faces like Deberg, all anybody would ever say is, "I like da Chiefs. Mmhmm. We'll see how good they can be this year. Maybe they'll make the playoffs."

[Easy 6]

Aw man, that's a mean swipe at DeBerg, he's a nice guy.

[RealSNR]

Originally Posted by scott free

Aw man, that's a mean swipe at DeBerg, he's a nice guy.

He's a nice guy, but he's also really really boring. And all he ever does is make shitty comments about the "board experts"

If he would get out there and actually write some football opinions in his posts and try to sell them to people, I wouldn't have a problem. But he never does. He's a more level-headed version of frazod.

[notorious]

If draft grades lead to Championships, Cleveland would have been a dynasty by now.


"Experts"? Give me a ****ing break.

[Mr. Arrowhead]

if the media is bored then why not go ahead and grade 2011 draft, there is no way no how you can grade a draft immediately after its over

[Pasta Little Brioni]

Talking Can wins the thread. Mjac still a whiny bitch.

[Marcellus]

Seattle got an F on their 2012 draft.

http://thebiglead.com/2014/02/06/mel...-gave-it-an-f/

Kiper gave them an D-

Bleacher Report an F

Prisco gave a D

SI a C

[Pasta Little Brioni]

Originally Posted by Marcellus

Seattle got an F on their 2012 draft.

http://thebiglead.com/2014/02/06/mel...-gave-it-an-f/

Kiper gave them an D-

Bleacher Report an F

Prisco gave a D

SI a C

CP baters laughed as well

[Pasta Little Brioni]

I thought Abdullah played well for being out of the league that long. Cummings who knows we can't count on anything. Abdullah has a track record of being a pretty good player.

[OnTheWarpath15]

Funny how people say draft grades don't matter, yet if all of these media outlets were giving us A's and claiming we were draft winners, y'all would be crowing about it.

There's nothing wrong with grading the draft this early - hell, we're all doing it too. Process team needs, the player taken, where he was taken and generate an opinion. It appears that most of you guys would give us an A to A-.

Pretty much everything I've seen gives the Chiefs anywhere from a B to a C-. A lot of that variance is based on the fact we didn't fill many needs, and that many of the players we picked have had serious medical question marks. You can't blame people for being concerned.

There's certainly some talent in this KC draft class, but there's a helluva lot of question marks as well. Hope they stay healthy so we can see some of that talent.

[chiefzilla1501]

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

Funny how people say draft grades don't matter, yet if all of these media outlets were giving us A's and claiming we were draft winners, y'all would be crowing about it.

There's nothing wrong with grading the draft this early - hell, we're all doing it too. Process team needs, the player taken, where he was taken and generate an opinion. It appears that most of you guys would give us an A to A-.

Pretty much everything I've seen gives the Chiefs anywhere from a B to a C-. A lot of that variance is based on the fact we didn't fill many needs, and that many of the players we picked have had serious medical question marks. You can't blame people for being concerned.

There's certainly some talent in this KC draft class, but there's a helluva lot of question marks as well. Hope they stay healthy so we can see some of that talent.

That would be right, if true. I'd give the draft a B+ because of medical concerns and because I don't 100% agree with Dorsey's board.

But that's not what people are grading on. The big critique is that we didn't draft for need. And that is a ludicrous argument. Drafting for BPA is a smart strategy, not one people should criticize. Now if people want to argue we didn't always take the BPA... that's fair. But that's not what people are saying. The critics would have been perfectly happy with a wide receiver or safety, even if that player had an average ceiling or wasn't BPA.