Evaluate Keyaron Fox

elvomito · 04:01 AM

So, does he replace Bell when DJ comes back?

Performance:

vs Mia (road)
Fox - 6 tackles 3 assists
Bell - 0 tackles 1 assist

vs Oak: (home)
Fox - 8 tackles
Bell - 2 tackles

edit:

vs denver (home)
Fox - 6 tackles 1 assist
Bell - 4 tackles 0 assist

vs cleveland (road)
Fox - 8 tackles 4 assists 1 sack
Bell - 2 tackles 1 assist

KurtCobain · 11-20-2006, 04:07 AM

yes.

he should

CupidStunt · 11-20-2006, 04:34 AM

Bell stinks so probably but those tackle stats are misleading. Fox didn't seem very good to me in yesterdays game.

donkhater · 11-20-2006, 06:19 AM

they are playing two different positions, technically. Besides, just because he's made more tackles, doesn't mean the offense isn't having success against him. Hell, they may be game-planning to his side of the field and as a result, he gets more opportunities to tackle.

boogblaster · 11-20-2006, 08:34 AM

Bell sucks...Fox is lost....

dj56dt58 · 11-20-2006, 09:07 AM

Fox can and will improve..Bell will continue to suck

MOhillbilly · 11-20-2006, 09:10 AM

i think next year for sure, after he has had time to digest the speed of the game and watch tape.

he seems to be outta position alot.

carlos3652 · 11-20-2006, 09:57 AM

In practice Fox sucks, he doesnt tackle very well either...

I think Fox will get better, but for now Bell is the better option.

I think the reason we do not see Bell often in the game is because the ball usually moves to DJ's side. These D stats can be misleading...

BigChiefFan · 11-20-2006, 10:02 AM

The Bell bashing is ridiculous-he was ****ing injured last year, but don't let the truth get in the way of a good witch hunt. He also has knocked some players dead in their tracks this year, but again ignore that, as well.

jspchief · 11-20-2006, 10:12 AM

Perfect example of how misleading stats can be.

Fox is around the ball a lot, but his tackling sucks. I'm not sure he's a huge upgrade over Bell. Maybe he deserves a look, but I've seen very little to convince me so far.

JBucc · 11-20-2006, 10:14 AM

For getting 8 tackles I hardly even noticed he played yesterday. Him and Bell will probably rotate a lot.

**Lzen** · 11-20-2006, 10:18 AM

I still remember that late missed tackle on 3rd down against Miami. I like Fox but I also think there's a good reason that the coaches aren't starting him over Bell.

shaneo69 · 11-20-2006, 10:29 AM

Never thought I'd be saying this, but Bell has looked better to me than Fox.

jspchief · 11-20-2006, 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shaneo69

Never thought I'd be saying this, but Bell has looked better to me than Fox.

There isn't a glaring difference to me in either direction.

Bell has played well lately. I'm still not convinced he's athletic enough to be a Cover 2 LB, but his lack of stats has more to do with his assigments than his play.

Fox gets around a lot of plays, but it's pretty evident that his tackling is sub-par. He's going to need to add strength or improve technique before I start clamoring for him to get on the field.

**Bowser** · 11-20-2006, 11:00 AM

Wasn't it floated around by the coaching staff that they might try Bell as a rush end on obvious passing downs? I think I've yet to see that.

11-20-2006, 03:54 AM
elvomito ☻☺ Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: ♠█♠ Casino cash: $10004900	Evaluate Keyaron Fox So, does he replace Bell when DJ comes back? Performance: vs Mia (road) Fox - 6 tackles 3 assists Bell - 0 tackles 1 assist vs Oak: (home) Fox - 8 tackles Bell - 2 tackles edit: vs denver (home) Fox - 6 tackles 1 assist Bell - 4 tackles 0 assist vs cleveland (road) Fox - 8 tackles 4 assists 1 sack Bell - 2 tackles 1 assist Last edited by elvomito; 12-04-2006 at 04:01 AM..
Posts: 2,362

11-20-2006, 04:07 AM	#2
KurtCobain legend Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Independence, MO Casino cash: $-1577903	yes. he should
Posts: 28,373

11-20-2006, 04:34 AM	#3
CupidStunt offense > defense Join Date: Jul 2005 Casino cash: $2513332	Bell stinks so probably but those tackle stats are misleading. Fox didn't seem very good to me in yesterdays game.
Posts: 8,918

11-20-2006, 06:19 AM	#4
donkhater Brilliant!! Join Date: Sep 2000 Location: Indiana, USA Casino cash: $10014051	they are playing two different positions, technically. Besides, just because he's made more tackles, doesn't mean the offense isn't having success against him. Hell, they may be game-planning to his side of the field and as a result, he gets more opportunities to tackle. __________________ The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants
Posts: 3,994

11-20-2006, 08:34 AM	#5
boogblaster MVP Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Verdigris Valley Campsite Casino cash: $10004900	Bell sucks...Fox is lost....
Posts: 10,305

11-20-2006, 09:07 AM	#6
dj56dt58 Banned Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Missouri Casino cash: $9960055	Fox can and will improve..Bell will continue to suck
Posts: 6,361

11-20-2006, 09:10 AM	#7
MOhillbilly Mama Tried Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Missouri Casino cash: $9949903	i think next year for sure, after he has had time to digest the speed of the game and watch tape. he seems to be outta position alot. __________________ True Son of Liberty
Posts: 23,371

11-20-2006, 09:57 AM	#8
carlos3652 El Diablo Join Date: Dec 2004 Casino cash: $4076679	In practice Fox sucks, he doesnt tackle very well either... I think Fox will get better, but for now Bell is the better option. I think the reason we do not see Bell often in the game is because the ball usually moves to DJ's side. These D stats can be misleading... __________________
Posts: 6,066

11-20-2006, 10:02 AM	#9
BigChiefFan MVP Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: In the Top 10 Casino cash: $9924205	The Bell bashing is ridiculous-he was ****ing injured last year, but don't let the truth get in the way of a good witch hunt. He also has knocked some players dead in their tracks this year, but again ignore that, as well. __________________ A 35 year drought can make you thirsty.
Posts: 15,777

11-20-2006, 10:12 AM	#10
jspchief BAMF Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Your Face Casino cash: $9998710	Perfect example of how misleading stats can be. Fox is around the ball a lot, but his tackling sucks. I'm not sure he's a huge upgrade over Bell. Maybe he deserves a look, but I've seen very little to convince me so far. __________________ Courage is not the absence of fear but rather the judgment that something is more important than fear. The brave may not live forever but the cautious do not live at all.
Posts: 27,207

11-20-2006, 10:14 AM	#11
JBucc MVP Join Date: Oct 2005 Casino cash: $10004952	For getting 8 tackles I hardly even noticed he played yesterday. Him and Bell will probably rotate a lot.
Posts: 12,016

11-20-2006, 10:18 AM	#12
Lzen Supporter Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Jan Quadrant Vincent 16 Casino cash: $2220692	I still remember that late missed tackle on 3rd down against Miami. I like Fox but I also think there's a good reason that the coaches aren't starting him over Bell. __________________ If at first you don't succeed ...skydiving is not for you.
Posts: 41,346

11-20-2006, 10:29 AM	#13
shaneo69 Smug Weasel Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Bleachers at Busch Casino cash: $10004900	Never thought I'd be saying this, but Bell has looked better to me than Fox. __________________ "I like Chiefs president Carl Peterson. I respect his business savvy. I envy his management skills and his penchant never to be driven by the whims of popularity. I admire his willingness to take responsibility for decisions that don’t work out the way he would have wanted." - Rufus, from KCChiefs.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Posts: 4,910

11-20-2006, 11:00 AM	#15
Bowser sorta mod-ish Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: KC North Casino cash: $3431616	Wasn't it floated around by the coaching staff that they might try Bell as a rush end on obvious passing downs? I think I've yet to see that.
Posts: 100,684