|
|
05-29-2010, 12:55 PM | #1 |
Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NJ
Casino cash: $1612207
|
Yeah, when we replaced (let's call it) the wife's TV and went from 60 to 120 I noticed a big difference, now that we are in the market to replace "my" TV where I watch a lot of sports I was wondering if the same held true for 120 to 240 to justify the price increase or if it was just hyped science tech where you will never notice.
|
Posts: 528
|
05-29-2010, 01:32 PM | #2 | |
C.H.I.E.F.S
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: **** your face
Casino cash: $10005055
|
Quote:
I have 2 55" lcds.One is a 120 and one is a 240 (bought them 2 years apart just FYI) and I honestly can't see the big deal.Maybe my eyes are old,or I'm just not watching the right stuff to make the difference clear cut. |
|
Posts: 12,621
|
05-29-2010, 01:34 PM | #3 |
Time Keeps On Slipping
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Overland Park
Casino cash: $5639900
|
Get plasma.
__________________
"Turn the channel to 26!" |
Posts: 27,294
|
05-29-2010, 04:22 PM | #4 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
Quote:
Well, that and holographic TV. |
|
Posts: 88,960
|
05-29-2010, 05:35 PM | #5 |
C.H.I.E.F.S
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: **** your face
Casino cash: $10005055
|
Maybe,but I'm thinking the human eye would never see the difference between being refreshed 120 vs 240 a second.I'm not even sure the brain could process the difference in real time,but I'm always up for seeing something I don't fully undertand.
|
Posts: 12,621
|
05-29-2010, 06:48 PM | #6 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
Quote:
If you to watching a baseball game, probably not. But with something like Avatar (and what they have planned for the future of cinema), probably so. But it sounds like you're set, either way. |
|
Posts: 88,960
|
|
|