Chiefs I think it's gonna be Barkley. - Page 4

ModSocks · 11-13-2012, 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck

All that being said, I'm not saying I think he's better than Smith or Wilson, just that I think he'll be the pick for a gunshy franchise.

Very well could be. Barkley has "safe" written all over him.

Chiefs Pantalones · 11-13-2012, 01:43 PM

Just me, but I prefer Barkley. Four year starter, has improved every year, pro style offense, etc. I'd be fine with any of the top three though.

RustShack · 11-13-2012, 01:43 PM

Barkley isn't even good enough to have a great season with a team stacked with talent. I want a QB that makes a team better than it is.

ModSocks · 11-13-2012, 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack

Barkley isn't even good enough to have a great season with a team stacked with talent. I want a QB that makes a team better than it is.

Is the team stacked with talent, or is Barkley making the talent around him better?

suds79 · 11-13-2012, 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack

Barkley isn't even good enough to have a great season with a team stacked with talent. I want a QB that makes a team better than it is.

2011 wasn't a great year for him?

Pasta Little Brioni · 11-13-2012, 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack

Barkley isn't even good enough to have a great season with a team stacked with talent. I want a QB that makes a team better than it is.

They should just draft Steele Jantz

lucifer · 11-13-2012, 02:00 PM

Bray will without a doubt be the best QB out of this class when they all retire from the nfl in 15-20 years.

suds79 · 11-13-2012, 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lucifer

Bray will without a doubt be the best QB out of this class when they all retire from the nfl in 15-20 years.

Maybe best physical tools but we don't even know if he'll end up declaring or not.

I think he could use another year so at this point he's dead to me. I don't think he's NFL ready.

Simply Red · 11-13-2012, 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lucifer

Bray will without a doubt be the best QB out of this class when they all retire from the nfl in 15-20 years.

completely reeruned.

Woodchuck · 11-13-2012, 03:07 PM

The Lane Kiffen connection is scary. When he was USC's WR coach, all of their WRs busted in the pros. When he was the OC, the QBs, WRs, and RBs busted.

Whatever he touches seems to go bad imo.

1. Wilson
2. Smith
3. Barkley

**RealSNR** · 11-13-2012, 03:12 PM

Also, when he started sucking, fans would call him Matt Broccoli.

Toadkiller · 11-13-2012, 03:16 PM

I was all for Barkley until USC got busted for deflating the footballs because he likes a flat ball to grip. This makes me worried that he has small hands and can't grip a fully inflated football that well. I dont know, just something I worry about now and would rather go Geno.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/gameon...balls/1691303/

keg in kc · 11-13-2012, 03:21 PM

Lee's the player you want from USC. Barkley's just kind of there.

**alnorth** · 11-13-2012, 03:30 PM

Barkley: 64.8 CMP%, 33 TD, 13 INT

Geno: 71.3 CMP%, 31 TD, 3 INT

Barkley's OL and surrounding cast is much better, he receives more protection and has more time to throw, and the teams he faced are about as tough or maybe slightly easier than the teams Geno faced. Geno is out-performing him. Geno also looks better. He has to make a decision quicker, and he makes fewer mistakes. The only concern is if Geno can adapt to an NFL offense.

Other than that, it really doesn't look like a tough decision to me. I wouldn't be pissed with Barkley, but I'm not picking him over Geno.

Chiefs Pantalones · 11-13-2012, 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alnorth

Barkley: 64.8 CMP%, 33 TD, 13 INT

Geno: 71.3 CMP%, 31 TD, 3 INT

Barkley's OL and surrounding cast is much better, he receives more protection and has more time to throw, and the teams he faced are about as tough or maybe slightly easier than the teams Geno faced. Geno is out-performing him. Geno also looks better. He has to make a decision quicker, and he makes fewer mistakes. The only concern is if Geno can adapt to an NFL offense.

Other than that, it really doesn't look like a tough decision to me. I wouldn't be pissed with Barkley, but I'm not picking him over Geno.

I like Geno but he's just really raw. Barkley is the more polished prospect at this point, with Geno having a higher ceiling and potential. The only thing is potential gets you fired in this league.

11-13-2012, 01:43 PM	#2
Chiefs Pantalones GO CHIEFS!!!!!! Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Kansas City Casino cash: $7888717	Just me, but I prefer Barkley. Four year starter, has improved every year, pro style offense, etc. I'd be fine with any of the top three though. __________________ Don't be fooled by my username, I'm white.
Posts: 26,630

11-13-2012, 01:43 PM	#3
RustShack **** That Noise Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Jack Trice Casino cash: $4606954	Barkley isn't even good enough to have a great season with a team stacked with talent. I want a QB that makes a team better than it is. __________________
Posts: 15,049

11-13-2012, 02:00 PM	#7
lucifer Banned Join Date: Nov 2012 Casino cash: $10004900	Bray will without a doubt be the best QB out of this class when they all retire from the nfl in 15-20 years.
Posts: 7

11-13-2012, 03:07 PM	#10
Woodchuck Banned Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: Pineapple Under the Sea Casino cash: $10004900	The Lane Kiffen connection is scary. When he was USC's WR coach, all of their WRs busted in the pros. When he was the OC, the QBs, WRs, and RBs busted. Whatever he touches seems to go bad imo. 1. Wilson 2. Smith 3. Barkley
Posts: 1,216

11-13-2012, 03:16 PM	#12
Toadkiller Garlic make my feet stank! Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Washougal, WA Casino cash: $5804921	I was all for Barkley until USC got busted for deflating the footballs because he likes a flat ball to grip. This makes me worried that he has small hands and can't grip a fully inflated football that well. I dont know, just something I worry about now and would rather go Geno. http://www.usatoday.com/story/gameon...balls/1691303/ Last edited by Toadkiller; 11-13-2012 at 03:23 PM..
Posts: 2,048

11-13-2012, 03:21 PM	#13
keg in kc oxymoron Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: OP/KC/Whatever Casino cash: $9556299	Lee's the player you want from USC. Barkley's just kind of there.
Posts: 58,682

11-13-2012, 03:30 PM	#14
alnorth . Join Date: Dec 2002 Casino cash: $57166239	Barkley: 64.8 CMP%, 33 TD, 13 INT Geno: 71.3 CMP%, 31 TD, 3 INT Barkley's OL and surrounding cast is much better, he receives more protection and has more time to throw, and the teams he faced are about as tough or maybe slightly easier than the teams Geno faced. Geno is out-performing him. Geno also looks better. He has to make a decision quicker, and he makes fewer mistakes. The only concern is if Geno can adapt to an NFL offense. Other than that, it really doesn't look like a tough decision to me. I wouldn't be pissed with Barkley, but I'm not picking him over Geno. __________________ how many emo kids does it take to change a lightbulb? HOW MANY?! none they just sit in the dark and cry
Posts: 36,130