Next Years Draft

**AustinChief** · 10-26-2005, 01:01 PM

Ok.. never too early to talk about the draft...

What position do you think needs to be taken in the first round?

As much as I want a premier WR... I would have to say offensive line.

--Kyle

MOhillbilly · 10-26-2005, 01:04 PM

d-line just because.

**AustinChief** · 10-26-2005, 01:05 PM

And this is who I would draft ...

Jonathan Scott
http://www.mackbrown-texasfootball.c...t_jonathan.htm

**alanm** · 10-26-2005, 01:08 PM

**AustinChief** · 10-26-2005, 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alanm

Just trying to add a football thread to the BBS... keep VailPass from throwing a hissy fit.

Cormac · 10-26-2005, 01:16 PM

How about this sh** again....

I think our biggest need is D-line

. With Sims healthy we have "serviceable" DTs. Our DEs still suck. I like Hall and Allen, but they can't both play all the time. If we had somebody like Julius Peppers, we'd be made. We played well against a weak Oline last week. Overall, I still worry about our pass rush more than anything.

Having said that, we probably need youth more on offense. So, my second choice would be a LT.

HolmeZz · 10-26-2005, 01:20 PM

DL or WR. Given where I think we'll be drafting in the first round, I'd opt for WR.

**alanm** · 10-26-2005, 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief

Just trying to add a football thread to the BBS... keep VailPass from throwing a hissy fit.

Well, carry on then. Perhaps we can all start a thread about how much the Bronco's truly suck.

StcChief · 10-26-2005, 01:24 PM

DLine..first thought. However depending on injury or retirements in Oline....

Roaf said he will be back. 2-3 yrs..
Oline - Others?

Draft higher - 24-32. Means we get in playoffs may endup with yet another WR project that may not pan out.

Mr. Laz · 10-26-2005, 01:32 PM

1. defensive line is still weak ... a stud DE would do wonders.

2. offensive line is old

3. wide receiver

better coaching would help everything

GoTrav · 10-26-2005, 01:50 PM

we could use help pretty much everywhere. We need a pass rusher in a serious way but also need to grab some help for the o-line. IMO Take the best available of either of those positions. We also need to start thinking about doing something as a replacement to Trent...either develop a QB or grab something in the free agent market. A legitimate #1 WR would be nice too, we've pretty much struck out in drafting that postion...forever.

Simplex3 · 10-26-2005, 01:51 PM

I think you have to figure out what you're going to do with Green. Sadly the Chiefs will blow the pick *cough*Blackledge*cough* as long as CP is around. I think they've spent plenty of picks on OL and DL in the past few years, it's time for those guys to step up and play. They haven't spent a real pick at QB in a long, long time have they?

MOhillbilly · 10-26-2005, 01:55 PM

On D the talent level while much improved(compared to years past) still could use a huge talent swing on the d-line. An undertackle who can stunt and play NT is what i would go for either in FA or the draft(i dont watch college football so i dont have any prospects)

**HemiEd** · 10-26-2005, 02:01 PM

O-Line
D-Line
QB

Chiefnj · 10-26-2005, 02:05 PM

RD 1 best available athlete at a position of need (LT, WR, DE, DT, FS).

RD 2 - trade for a high quality position of need not addressed in the draft.

Rd 3 - best available athlete.

By best available athlete I don't mean workout numbers. College productivity with potential.

View Poll Results: What position should we draft first in 2006?
Offensive Line	33	47.14%
Wide Receiver	11	15.71%
Defensive Line	14	20.00%
Quarterback	8	11.43%
Gazman	4	5.71%
Voters: 70. You may not vote on this poll

10-26-2005, 01:01 PM
AustinChief Administrator Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Austin Casino cash: $2659112	Next Years Draft Ok.. never too early to talk about the draft... What position do you think needs to be taken in the first round? As much as I want a premier WR... I would have to say offensive line. --Kyle
Posts: 19,511

10-26-2005, 01:04 PM	#2
MOhillbilly Mama Tried Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Missouri Casino cash: $9949903	d-line just because. __________________ True Son of Liberty
Posts: 23,371

10-26-2005, 01:05 PM	#3
AustinChief Administrator Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Austin Casino cash: $2659112	And this is who I would draft ... Jonathan Scott http://www.mackbrown-texasfootball.c...t_jonathan.htm
Posts: 19,511

10-26-2005, 01:08 PM	#4
alanm Feeling Victorian Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Nebraska/Wyoming/Colorado Casino cash: $1826436	Attached Thumbnails __________________ It bears repeating, ** Herm, Pioli, Haley, and Crennel for ing up my franchise for a goddamn decade. Buehler 445**
Posts: 33,619

10-26-2005, 01:16 PM	#6
Cormac Haley sceptic.... Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: waiting it out....... Casino cash: $10004900	How about this sh** again.... I think our biggest need is D-line . With Sims healthy we have "serviceable" DTs. Our DEs still suck. I like Hall and Allen, but they can't both play all the time. If we had somebody like Julius Peppers, we'd be made. We played well against a weak Oline last week. Overall, I still worry about our pass rush more than anything. Having said that, we probably need youth more on offense. So, my second choice would be a LT.
Posts: 2,406

10-26-2005, 01:20 PM	#7
HolmeZz i guess its bittersweet poetry Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: NeW HaVeN, CT Casino cash: $10004900	DL or WR. Given where I think we'll be drafting in the first round, I'd opt for WR.
Posts: 16,520

10-26-2005, 01:24 PM	#9
StcChief Playing for #1 Draft Pick Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Just West of Lambs land Casino cash: $10004900	DLine..first thought. However depending on injury or retirements in Oline.... Roaf said he will be back. 2-3 yrs.. Oline - Others? Draft higher - 24-32. Means we get in playoffs may endup with yet another WR project that may not pan out. __________________ sig test for this screwy schema
Posts: 25,901

10-26-2005, 01:32 PM	#10
Mr. Laz Don't Tease Me Join Date: Dec 2000 Location: KS Casino cash: $11047037	1. defensive line is still weak ... a stud DE would do wonders. 2. offensive line is old 3. wide receiver better coaching would help everything __________________
Posts: 95,626

10-26-2005, 01:50 PM	#11
GoTrav Veteran Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Lee's Summit, MO Casino cash: $10004900	we could use help pretty much everywhere. We need a pass rusher in a serious way but also need to grab some help for the o-line. IMO Take the best available of either of those positions. We also need to start thinking about doing something as a replacement to Trent...either develop a QB or grab something in the free agent market. A legitimate #1 WR would be nice too, we've pretty much struck out in drafting that postion...forever.
Posts: 1,018

10-26-2005, 01:51 PM	#12
Simplex3 MVP Join Date: Sep 2003 Casino cash: $10004900	I think you have to figure out what you're going to do with Green. Sadly the Chiefs will blow the pick coughBlackledgecough as long as CP is around. I think they've spent plenty of picks on OL and DL in the past few years, it's time for those guys to step up and play. They haven't spent a real pick at QB in a long, long time have they?
Posts: 28,527

10-26-2005, 01:55 PM	#13
MOhillbilly Mama Tried Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Missouri Casino cash: $9949903	On D the talent level while much improved(compared to years past) still could use a huge talent swing on the d-line. An undertackle who can stunt and play NT is what i would go for either in FA or the draft(i dont watch college football so i dont have any prospects) __________________ True Son of Liberty
Posts: 23,371

10-26-2005, 02:01 PM	#14
HemiEd Supporter Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Ozarks Casino cash: $3270564	O-Line D-Line QB
Posts: 33,425

10-26-2005, 02:05 PM	#15
Chiefnj MVP Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Willis, Harris and Davis. Casino cash: $10004900	RD 1 best available athlete at a position of need (LT, WR, DE, DT, FS). RD 2 - trade for a high quality position of need not addressed in the draft. Rd 3 - best available athlete. By best available athlete I don't mean workout numbers. College productivity with potential.
Posts: 6,811