|
|
01-31-2013, 02:03 PM | #1 | |
PermaBanned
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Jouissance
Casino cash: $10011570
|
Quote:
He'll have to show something in year one, but it doesn't have to be game one of year one. |
|
Posts: 47,521
|
01-31-2013, 02:05 PM | #2 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
Quote:
If you're taking a QB #1 overall and he needs "years to develop", you're making a dumb decision and you're reaching. |
|
Posts: 88,960
|
01-31-2013, 02:09 PM | #3 |
Caralho
Join Date: Sep 2011
Casino cash: $9631474
|
With the level of inept QB play we've seen this year, I don't see why Geno, Wilson, Barkley, and Glennon couldn't or shouldn't start if drafted by a team needing a QB.
__________________
Perhaps we can fly. All of us. How will we ever know unless we leap from some tall tower? No man ever truly knows what he can do unless he dares to leap. |
Posts: 18,453
|
01-31-2013, 02:11 PM | #4 | |
PermaBanned
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Jouissance
Casino cash: $10011570
|
Quote:
Doesn't mean it will be "years" until the QB sees the field. But a development process of years is a certainty, just as it is for Luck and RGIII. |
|
Posts: 47,521
|
01-31-2013, 02:12 PM | #5 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
Quote:
But in today's climate, there is absolutely no reason for a guy taken at #1 overall to sit on the bench. |
|
Posts: 88,960
|
01-31-2013, 02:13 PM | #6 | |
First Overall
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: kcmo
Casino cash: $10007271
|
Quote:
I am beginning to think the unthinkable too, with regard to the QB position in KC.
__________________
The Greatest |
|
Posts: 10,580
|
|
|