Hypersonic Cruise Missile: America's New Global Strike Weapon

[Lzen]

Hypersonic Cruise Missile: America's New Global Strike Weapon
The mission: Attack anywhere in the world in less than an hour. But is the Pentagon's bold program a critical new weapon for hitting elusive targets, or a good way to set off a nuclear war?

By Noah Shachtman
Diagrams by Kakofonia
Published in the January, 2007 issue.

A tip sets the plan in motion — a whispered warning of a North Korean nuclear launch, or of a shipment of biotoxins bound for a Hezbollah stronghold in Lebanon. Word races through the American intelligence network until it reaches U.S. Strategic Command headquarters, the Pentagon and, eventually, the White House. In the Pacific, a nuclear-powered Ohio class submarine surfaces, ready for the president's command to launch.

When the order comes, the sub shoots a 65-ton Trident II ballistic missile into the sky. Within 2 minutes, the missile is traveling at more than 20,000 ft. per second. Up and over the oceans and out of the atmosphere it soars for thousands of miles. At the top of its parabola, hanging in space, the Trident's four warheads separate and begin their screaming descent down toward the planet. Traveling as fast as 13,000 mph, the warheads are filled with scored tungsten rods with twice the strength of steel. Just above the target, the warheads detonate, showering the area with thousands of rods-each one up to 12 times as destructive as a .50-caliber bullet. Anything within 3000 sq. ft. of this whirling, metallic storm is obliterated.

If Pentagon strategists get their way, there will be no place on the planet to hide from such an assault. The plan is part of a program — in slow development since the 1990s, and now quickly coalescing in military circles — called Prompt Global Strike. It will begin with modified Tridents. But eventually, Prompt Global Strike could encompass new generations of aircraft and armaments five times faster than anything in the current American arsenal. One candidate: the X-51 hypersonic cruise missile, which is designed to hit Mach 5 — roughly 3600 mph. The goal, according to the U.S. Strategic Command's deputy commander Lt. Gen. C. Robert Kehler, is "to strike virtually anywhere on the face of the Earth within 60 minutes."

The question is whether such an attack can be deployed without triggering World War III: Those tungsten-armed Tridents look, and fly, exactly like the deadliest weapons in the American nuclear arsenal.

Continued here: http://www.popularmechanics.com/tech...w/4203874.html

[Donger]

Originally Posted by Lzen

The question is whether such an attack can be deployed without triggering World War III: Those tungsten-armed Tridents look, and fly, exactly like the deadliest weapons in the American nuclear arsenal.

There's the rub.

[Lzen]

Originally Posted by Donger

There's the rub.

Yeah, I'm a little nervous about using the Trident missiles with conventional explosives for this. Perhaps the X-51 is a better solution.

[Donger]

Originally Posted by Lzen

Yeah, I'm a little nervous about using the Trident missiles with conventional explosives for this. Perhaps the X-51 is a better solution.

If they ever get it to work, yes. But even Mach 7 isn't really very fast. Our ICBMs can hit anywhere in the world in ~30 minutes.

[Donger]

I love this picture...

.

[listopencil]

I like it. Make it so.

[Chiefs_Fan]

Originally Posted by Donger

I love this picture...

.

Cool, but what is that a picture of?

[ptlyon]

Cool. I need one. Or 5.

Hail Cobra!

[Donger]

Originally Posted by Chiefs_Fan

Cool, but what is that a picture of?

God.

Actually, those are re-entry vehicles.

[patteeu]

Originally Posted by listopencil

I like it. Make it so.

Ditto

[Kylo Ren]

In the Pacific, a nuclear-powered Ohio class submarine surfaces, ready for the president's command to launch.

Why does the sub have to surface? Our subs don't have to surface to fire their missles.

[FAX]

Air, Mr. Gunther_Fan.

FAX

[jiveturkey]

There was a PopSci article recently that talked about firing tungsten rods from satellites. They would reach approximately 36,000 feet/second and would ruin a lot of people's day.

Those people wouldn't have a lot of time to run away either.

[Radar Chief]

Originally Posted by FAX

Air, Mr. Gunther_Fan.

FAX

[Adept Havelock]

I remember a concept similar to this that was kicked around back in the 70's. I believe it was called "Thor" but may be thinking of another system.

It was similar to this, but instead of launching them from an ICBM (which could be horribly misinterpreted as Donger pointed out) they drop from Satellites, which of course presents it's own problems.

Hell of a kinetic energy weapon, either way.