Anderson, Bell > Holmes, Johnson....????

Deberg_1990 · 10-23-2005, 04:38 PM

You would think so, considering how much Simms is slobbering all over their knobs.....

|Zach| · 10-23-2005, 04:39 PM

Wow, another thread based on what someone in the media thinks.

HolmeZz · 10-23-2005, 04:40 PM

Well the Broncos are playing, dumbass. He's not going to be talking about Priest and LJ.

Deberg_1990 · 10-23-2005, 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZachKC

Wow, another thread based on what someone in the media thinks.

Dont you realize everything on TV and radio is true??

**Rausch** · 10-23-2005, 04:43 PM

Honestly...

kcxiv · 10-23-2005, 04:45 PM

Both great running teams, its a pick em.

|Zach| · 10-23-2005, 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990

Dont you realize everything on TV and radio is true??

So you are in agreement its a silly thread.

Deberg_1990 · 10-23-2005, 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZachKC

So you are in agreement its a silly thread.

Its meant to be a sarcastic thread..yes.

penchief · 10-23-2005, 05:07 PM

One has to look at this analytically.

Let's take all four backs together. Stylewise it could be said that Johnson is closer to Anderson and Bell is Closer to Holmes. Anyone who would take Anderson over Johnson is foolish. Anyone who would take Bell over Holmes would do so only because of age.

Bell has more speed than Holmes but Holmes has proven himself playing within two different systems. Anderson has not shown anything special to separate himself from what appears to be special talents in Johnson; speed, power, and vision. All of which he has more of than Anderson. Include his youth and low-wear and you have a no brainer on that count. Bronc fans would trade Anderson for Johnson in a heartbeat.

On the other hand, if you want to compare Holmes with Anderson and Bell with Johnson then there is absolutely no comparison. Holmes is hands down superior to Anderson. Johnson is a specical all-around talent while Bell would have to prove himself in a system that did not accentuate his skills.

JMHO.

Deberg_1990 · 10-23-2005, 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penchief

One has to look at this analytically.

Let's take all four backs together. Stylewise it could be said that Johnson is closer to Anderson and Bell is Closer to Holmes. Anyone who would take Anderson over Johnson is foolish. Anyone who would take Bell over Holmes would do so only because of age.

Bell has more speed than Holmes but Holmes has proven himself playing within two different systems. Anderson has not shown anything special to separate himself from what appears to be special talents in Johnson; speed, power, and vision. All of which he has more of than Anderson. Include his youth and low-wear and you have a no brainer on that count.

On the other hand, if you want to compare Holmes with Anderson and Bell with Johnson then there is absolutely no comparison. Holmes is hands down superior to Anderson. Johnson is a specical all-around talent while Bell would have to prove himself in a system that did not accentuate his skills.

JMHO.

Nice writeup....my thoughts exactly.

10-23-2005, 04:38 PM
Deberg_1990 In Search of a Life Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: San Antonio Tx. Casino cash: $3914454	Anderson, Bell > Holmes, Johnson....???? You would think so, considering how much Simms is slobbering all over their knobs.....
Posts: 66,914

10-23-2005, 04:39 PM	#2
\|Zach\| For The Glory Of The City Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Kansas City Casino cash: $5296768	Wow, another thread based on what someone in the media thinks.
Posts: 53,442

10-23-2005, 04:40 PM	#3
HolmeZz i guess its bittersweet poetry Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: NeW HaVeN, CT Casino cash: $10004900	Well the Broncos are playing, dumbass. He's not going to be talking about Priest and LJ.
Posts: 16,520

10-23-2005, 04:45 PM	#6
kcxiv In Search of a Life Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Central Valley, Cali Casino cash: $8807996	Both great running teams, its a pick em.
Posts: 29,110

10-23-2005, 05:07 PM	#9
penchief MVP Join Date: Feb 2003 Casino cash: $6325286	One has to look at this analytically. Let's take all four backs together. Stylewise it could be said that Johnson is closer to Anderson and Bell is Closer to Holmes. Anyone who would take Anderson over Johnson is foolish. Anyone who would take Bell over Holmes would do so only because of age. Bell has more speed than Holmes but Holmes has proven himself playing within two different systems. Anderson has not shown anything special to separate himself from what appears to be special talents in Johnson; speed, power, and vision. All of which he has more of than Anderson. Include his youth and low-wear and you have a no brainer on that count. Bronc fans would trade Anderson for Johnson in a heartbeat. On the other hand, if you want to compare Holmes with Anderson and Bell with Johnson then there is absolutely no comparison. Holmes is hands down superior to Anderson. Johnson is a specical all-around talent while Bell would have to prove himself in a system that did not accentuate his skills. JMHO.
Posts: 17,030