The 49ers have expressed to others that a deal for QB Alex Smith is effectively DONE

[ShowtimeSBMVP]

Jason La Canfora ‏@JasonLaCanfora

The 49ers have expressed to others that a deal for QB Alex Smith is effectively complete. Can't be finalized til league year begins 3/12


Jason La Canfora ‏@JasonLaCanfora

so it's not official, both clubs view it at as it's effectively done. I do not know the other team. KC and JAX are 2 teams that make sense

[The Franchise]

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP

Tell us... what position and player wouldn't be a reach at #1 overall in this year's draft?

He already said that KC needs to take a LT.


That's when I told him to leave and never come back.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by Frankie

I agree with you there. It's very frustrating. I would actually petition the NFL to allow us transfer our top draft pick to next year, if it were possible.

Methinks you failed to understand what I said.

[NJChiefsFan]

Originally Posted by Marvin49

LOL.

Wow.

I never professed to be an expert on the Chiefs. I'm speaking from the perspective of a guy who thinks its foolish to reach at any position.

Wow....I thought Seattle had an angry fanbase. This place takes the cake...LOL.

Dude you don't need to be an expert. Post opinions, overall I don't mind you. But if you are going to come here and say "take a LT" or "Take a LT and I heard move Albert to RT" at least realize that you are going to get shit since we don't need either position. How can you not understand how it would piss us off for someone to come here and say "oh don't take this guy, take this guy" when the guy you are suggesting is not a position we need.

Damn right we are pissed. Our team has sucked forever and people come in here pretending like they "get it". You don't get it. You don't at all and its not your fault. You can't get it as a 9ers fan. You think your mini stretch of failure makes you understand but it doesn't.

This franchise has been a failure. People cherry pick times to come in and suggest what KC should do. But you know what happens when we follow the suggestions, you all leave and forget to watch how it DOESN'T work. On top of that, half our fan base and all our media are a bunch of mouth breathing idiots.

[RyFo18]

Originally Posted by Marvin49

Jeez...

What's with all the venom man? I'm just a fellow football fan giving my opinion. I got nothing against the Chiefs...in fact I have a special hatred in my heart for all things Silver and Black so I really kinda root for KC every year.

I'm not your opponent here.

I'm just saying that I don't think you should reach for a QB. I think most people who fallow the draft would tell you the exact same thing.

It's all deaf ears in here. It's not you, it's us.

Everything you say makes sense. We want Geno to be that guy though.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by Frankie

No. I'm frustrated that there are not much alternative. If the Chiefs take Geno at the top I'll accept it. But I don't have to like it.

With my belief that the Chiefs will eventually evolve into a 43D I was warming up to a 34-DE/43-DT type (and a QB in the 2nd round). And the only one who seemed to be close to the top pick value there was Star Lotilelei. But of course he may never get even drafted now.

[DaKCMan AP]

Originally Posted by Pestilence

He already said that KC needs to take a LT.


That's when I told him to leave and never come back.

Then he's a certified moron. Several people have already pointed out that Geno is a better QB prospect than Joeckel is an OT prospect - AND - that a very good QB prospect >> a great OT prospect.

[Frankie]

Originally Posted by Pestilence

Why. He has a heart condition. And I know a thing or two about Ejection Fraction. When it comes to the heart, of course.

[The Franchise]

Originally Posted by Frankie

Why. He has a heart condition. And I know a thing or two about Ejection Fraction. When it comes to the heart, of course.

He's not going to go undrafted.

[NJChiefsFan]

Originally Posted by Marvin49

Jeez...

What's with all the venom man? I'm just a fellow football fan giving my opinion. I got nothing against the Chiefs...in fact I have a special hatred in my heart for all things Silver and Black so I really kinda root for KC every year.

I'm not your opponent here.

I'm just saying that I don't think you should reach for a QB. I think most people who fallow the draft would tell you the exact same thing.

So you don't think we should reach for QB but we should draft a LT when we already have a guy to be LT and have a RT? We aren't supposed to be annoyed by that. By you and the experts all ignoring the fact that we don't need a LT?

[hometeam]

Originally Posted by Marvin49

Jeez...

What's with all the venom man? I'm just a fellow football fan giving my opinion. I got nothing against the Chiefs...in fact I have a special hatred in my heart for all things Silver and Black so I really kinda root for KC every year.

I'm not your opponent here.

I'm just saying that I don't think you should reach for a QB. I think most people who fallow the draft would tell you the exact same thing.

The problem is, your talking out of your ass, and don't know shit, except you keep pretending you do.

Why do other teams fans keep coming to this forum, talking dumb shit about something they know NOTHING about, and then wonder why they are viewed as ****ing dumbasses?

Go back and read through the ten thousand post original draft geno thread, and then this one. Clear your mind and focus on the posts directly related to Geno. The accuracy breakdowns, the throw breakdowns, hell, do like all of us have and watch EVERY THROW geno has ever made in college. Then come back and tell me hes not worth 1.1

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by Frankie

This argument is only valid if there were Geno, a lot of daylight, and the next best QB. IMO there's not that much daylight between him and the next guy. I bet Reid and Dorsey think so too.

There isn't a lot of daylight between Geno and Barkley. There's a metric ton of distance between them and everybody else.

In that sense, it's a lot like last year.

[ModSocks]

Originally Posted by Marvin49

LOL.

Wow.

I never professed to be an expert on the Chiefs. I'm speaking from the perspective of a guy who thinks its foolish to reach at any position.

Wow....I thought Seattle had an angry fanbase. This place takes the cake...LOL.

Please explain to me how taking yet another LT (when we already have a LT & RT as well as young depth at the position) will make the team better?

How "valuable" is a pick that doesn't make your team any better?

Is a LT going to magically make the Chiefs score more points? How about an OLB? Are we going to score more points with a pass rusher? Is that what you consider "value"? Taking a player that will have little to no impact on our roster?

Imo, that's not value....that's wasting a draft pick.

[NJChiefsFan]

Originally Posted by RyFo18

It's all deaf ears in here. It's not you, it's us.

Everything you say makes sense. We want Geno to be that guy though.

Suggesting we take a LT when there is Albert or suggesting we take a LT and move Albert to RT when we have Winston isn't falling on deaf ears, it's falling on ears that hear it and realize it doesn't make sense.

[Old Dog]

I've got to say that this is one of the absolute best trolling efforts in a LONG, LONG time

[Frankie]

Originally Posted by Detoxing

???

Do you remember anything about that draft at all?

Aaron Rodgers was suppose to have been a top 5 pick. Thanks to the system he played in, teams viewed him as "risky".

So what turned out to be more risky? Passing on or taking Aaron Rodgers?

This isn't hard.

Yeah. You are arguing that Rodgers and Smith were a toss up. The 9ers reached for one and the other dropped. At the time, taking either one at the top was considered a reach. So what?