Danna back on a 3 year deal

[ShowtimeSBMVP]

The #Chiefs have agreed to terms with DE Mike Danna on a three-year deal, source says. Another piece of Kansas City’s defensive front stays put. pic.twitter.com/smpBBx7RG5

— Mike Garafolo (@MikeGarafolo) April 5, 2024

[scho63]

Not bad, not bad at all.

[ThyKingdomCome15]

Strange to see Danna go for this much this late in free agency. I figured his market was half that by now.

[ChiefsFanatic]

Originally Posted by staylor26

Not upset but I do remember a lot of people not being fans.

Last year, several players, and Spags, called Danna the unsung hero of the defense.

[Pablo]

This is nice. He's a very solid piece on that DL.

[BWillie]

I like him but what is the bro getting paid?

[Chiefshrink]

Originally Posted by -King-

Nice. Wasn't expecting a 3 year deal.

Just tells you how important he is to Spags and the defense. Danna is an unsung hero in my opinion.

[-King-]

Originally Posted by ThaVirus

Agreed. I mentioned that he was an “overachiever” in a debate with Staylor during the season.

He’s sneaky good and has developed well, but he’s the type I think I’d have preferred we let get his second contract elsewhere.

A certain someone probably didn't develop how they'd hoped up to this point so they brought Danna back to start.

[phisherman]

Just for kicks, I compared Danna's stats last year to any of Frank Clark's years in KC and I'd be interested to see anyone try to say, after the same comparison, that this isn't a pretty darn good deal in relation.

[phisherman]

5 years and 63 million guaranteed versus 3 years and 13 million guaranteed? Jesus, folks, seek help if you think the Chiefs overpaid.

[MahomesMagic]

Originally Posted by phisherman

Danna was very solid last year and Omenihu isn't going to play much if at all this year. Good signing. He gets no love but really has done some nice work for the Chiefs.

He gives Frank Clark results for a discount.

Why would you measure against a contract that was flat out horrible?

[Easy 6]

Originally Posted by -King-

A certain someone probably didn't develop how they'd hoped up to this point so they brought Danna back to start.

You talking smack on FAU?

He's just now a sophomore, I'm good if the braintrust wants to ensure stability there

[-King-]

Originally Posted by Easy 6

You talking smack on FAU?

He's just now a sophomore, I'm good if the braintrust wants to ensure stability there

Yeah but they're not giving this contract to Danna just to be depth. And I'm pretty sure they expected FAU to develop faster than he did. No one drafts a player in the 1st round expecting them to be a healthy scratch in the playoffs.

[ForeverChiefs58]

#Chiefs DE Mike Danna has 17 career sacks in the regular season. Nine of them have come against AFC West opponents.
Chargers: 5
Broncos: 2
Raiders: 2 pic.twitter.com/YUc7stua2U

— Charles Goldman (@goldmctNFL) April 5, 2024

[ForeverChiefs58]

I wrote this last week. This is what it means for the Chiefs to retain Mike Danna’s services. pic.twitter.com/6qcLoVGm8A

— Nate Taylor (@ByNateTaylor) April 5, 2024

[RealSNR]

Originally Posted by -King-

A certain someone probably didn't develop how they'd hoped up to this point so they brought Danna back to start.

He's made some flash plays nearly every time he's been on the field, as little as it's been.

I'm not saying he's God's gift to football or anything, only that I find it a bit ridiculous that one of the first reactions people are having to being 3-deep at DE is, "Well, one of them must be sucking ass..."