@nfldraftscout (Matt Miller) will be on 610 from 1-2

[Rambozo]

Originally Posted by O.city

Did you watch ANY of his other playoff games? or do those not count?

The one where Flacco lead the Ravens back in the 4th? It's important man and it seems to come down to the end 50% of the time. We need a guy who can carry the team when the game is on the line. We need a guy who can make the play when it must be made. For me, that is the difference between Wilson and Geno. Wilson has done it much more often that Geno.

[O.city]

Originally Posted by Rambozo

The one where Flacco lead the Ravens back in the 4th? It's important man and it seems to come down to the end 50% of the time.

Matt Ryan's other performances you ****ing dip shit. You know, the ones where he scored a whopping 2 points against the Giants?

[Rambozo]

Originally Posted by O.city

Matt Ryan's other performances you ****ing dip shit.

Yes, I did. I watched the loss in Arizona and the loss in NY. He has shown he can do it in college and in the pros. It was no suprise when he finally led the comeback last week.

You know what Tom Brady and Russell Wilson did great in college? They led 4th quarter comebacks. It shows up in the NFL.

[O.city]

Originally Posted by Rambozo

Yes, I did. I watched the loss in Arizona and the loss in NY. He has shown he can do it in college and in the pros. It was no suprise when he finally led the comeback last week.

You know what Tom Brady and Russell Wilson did great in college? They led 4th quarter comebacks. It shows up in the NFL.

So did Tim Tebow

[Fansy the Famous Bard]

Originally Posted by Rambozo

The one where Flacco lead the Ravens back in the 4th? It's important man and it seems to come down to the end 50% of the time. We need a guy who can carry the team when the game is on the line. We need a guy who can make the play when it must be made. For me, that is the difference between Wilson and Geno. Wilson has done it much more often that Geno.

So let me get this straight.. You're saying draft Wilson because he's more flacco, Not Smith because he's more Rodgers?

You would rather have Joe Flacco as your QB than Aaron Rodgers?

And you're saying this with a straight face?

[Rambozo]

Originally Posted by Zeke

So let me get this straight.. You're saying draft Wilson because he's more flacco, Not Smith because he's more Rodgers?

You would rather have Joe Flacco as your QB than Aaron Rodgers?

And you're saying this with a straight face?

That's not what I am saying at all. I am saying draft a QB that has the skillset and has won the close ones and come through when it counted. Draft a QB that looks like he can develop into someone as good as Joe Flacco is NOW.

I'm saying if Reid and Dorsey think they can get one of the two (Geno or Wilson) in 20s on up in the first, then wait and do it. If that's the case, I think they will.

Our second and third round picks are good ones and most of those teams in the 20's have QBs. Someone like the Saints who lost draft picks might be willing to trade.

[O.city]

Originally Posted by Rambozo

That's not what I am saying at all. I am saying draft a QB that has the skillset and has won the close ones and come through when it counted. Draft a QB that looks like he can develop into someone as good as Joe Flacco is NOW.

I'm saying if Reid and Dorsey think they can get one of the two (Geno or Wilson) in 20s on up in the first, then wait and do it. If that's the case, I think they will.

Wait and do what? How do they wait and take a pick with which they don't have?

[Rambozo]

Originally Posted by O.city

Wait and do what? How do they wait and take a pick with which they don't have?

It's called trading. there were more first round trades in last year's draft than there ever have been because of the new rookie cap. We can use our second and third and still have the comp pick for Carr.

Again, if they don't feel the QBs are worth taking at #1, they will gamble. It's a real possibility guys.

[O.city]

Originally Posted by Rambozo

It's called trading. there were more first round trades in last year's draft than there ever have been because of the new rookie cap. We can use our second and third and still have the comp pick for Carr.

So trade the second pick int he 2nd round, the 1st pick in the 3rd round to trade back up and get a guy you could have just taken first overall?

Sounds right.

[Chiefnj2]

Originally Posted by O.city

So trade the second pick int he 2nd round, the 1st pick in the 3rd round to trade back up and get a guy you could have just taken first overall?

Sounds right.

Except you are not including the original guy you draft. Assuming Albert isn't extended, people would really be upset walking out of the first three rounds of the draft with the best LT and Wilson?

[O.city]

Originally Posted by Rambozo

It's called trading. there were more first round trades in last year's draft than there ever have been because of the new rookie cap. We can use our second and third and still have the comp pick for Carr.

Again, if they don't feel the QBs are worth taking at #1, they will gamble. It's a real possibility guys.

Dorsey, the new GM we have, comes from the Packers. He's stated that they will be sticking closely to the Packers philosophy, one which doesn't gamble on draft day.

[Rambozo]

Originally Posted by O.city

Dorsey, the new GM we have, comes from the Packers. He's stated that they will be sticking closely to the Packers philosophy, one which doesn't gamble on draft day.

Reid has traded in seven of his last ten drafts. He moved up and got the guy he wanted five of the seven times.

If we trade the 2nd and 3rd we get a really good first round player and a good QB. Again, they have to be sure one of the two will drop.